Skip to main content

Can We Get Better Assessment from a Tutoring System Compared to Traditional Paper Testing? Can We Have Our Cake (Better Assessment) and Eat It too (Student Learning during the Test)?

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6095))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Dynamic assessment (DA) has been advocated as an interactive approach to conducting assessments to students in the learning systems. Sternberg and others proposed to give students tests to see how much assistance it takes a student to learn a topic; and to use as a measure of their learning gain. To researchers in the ITS community, it comes as no surprise that measuring how much assistance a student needs to complete a task successfully is probably a good indicator of this lack of knowledge. However, a cautionary note is that conducting DA takes more time than simply administering regular test items to students. In this paper, we report a study analyzing 40-minutes data of totally 1,392 students from two school years. The result suggests that for the purpose of assessing student performance, it is more efficient for students to take DA than just having practice items.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Feng, M., Heffernan, N.T., Koedinger, K.R.: Addressing the assessment challenge in an online system that tutors as it assesses. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction: The Journal of Personalization Research 19(3), 243–266 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fuchs, L.S., Compton, D.L., Fuchs, D., Hollenbeck, K.N., Craddock, C.F., Hamlett, C.L.: Dynamic assessment of algebraic learning in predicting third graders’ development of mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology 100(4), 829–850 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Grigorenko, E.L., Sternberg, R.J.: Dynamic testing. Psychological Bulletin 124, 75–111 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sternburg, R.J., Grigorenko, E.L.: All testing is dynamic testing. Issues in Education 7, 137–170 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sternburg, R.J., Grigorenko, E.L.: Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Feng, M., Heffernan, N. (2010). Can We Get Better Assessment from a Tutoring System Compared to Traditional Paper Testing? Can We Have Our Cake (Better Assessment) and Eat It too (Student Learning during the Test)?. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6095. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13437-1_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13437-1_54

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13436-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13437-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics