Skip to main content

Verifiable Semantic Model for Agent Interactions Using Social Commitments

  • Conference paper
Book cover Languages, Methodologies, and Development Tools for Multi-Agent Systems (LADS 2009)

Abstract

Existing approaches about defining formal semantics of commitment usually consider operations as axioms or constrains on top of the commitment semantics, which fail to capture the meaning of interactions that are central to real-life business scenarios. Furthermore, existing semantic frameworks using different logics do not gather the full semantics of commitment operations and semantics of social commitments within the same framework. This paper develops a novel unified semantic model for social commitments and their operations. It proposes a logical model based on a new logic extending CTL * with commitments and operations to specify agent interactions. We also propose a new definition of assignment and delegation operations by considering the relationship between the original and new commitment contents. We prove that the proposed model satisfies some properties that are desirable when modeling agent interactions in MASs and introduce a NetBill protocol as a running example to clarify the automatic verification of this model. Finally, we present an implementation and report on experimental results of this protocol using the NuSMV and MCMAS symbolic model checkers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bentahar, J., Moulin, B., Meyer, J.-J.C., Chaib-draa, B.: A Logical Model for Commitment and Argument Network for Agent Communication. In: 3rd International Joint Conference on AAMAS, pp. 792–799 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bentahar, J., Moulin, B., Meyer, J.-J.C., Lespérance, Y.: A New Logical Semantics for Agent Communication. In: Inoue, K., Satoh, K., Toni, F. (eds.) CLIMA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4371, pp. 151–170. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bentahar, J., Meyer, J.-J.C., Wan, W.: Model Checking Communicative Agent-based Systems. Knowledge-Based Systems, Special Issue on Intelligent Software Design 22(3), 142–159 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boella, G., Damiano, R., Hulstijn, J., Torre, L.: Distinguishing Propositional and Action Commitment in Agent Communication. In: Workshop of Computational Modeles of Natural Argument, CMNA 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cimatti, A., Clarke, E., Giunchiglia, E., Giunchiglia, F., Pistore, M., Roveri, M., Sebastiani, R., Tacchella, A.: NuSMV 2: An Open Source Tool for Symbolic Model Checking. In: Brinksma, E., Larsen, K.G. (eds.) CAV 2002. LNCS, vol. 2404, pp. 241–268. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng, Z.: Verifying Commitment based Business Protocols and their Compositions: Model Checking using Promela and Spin. PhD. thesis, North Carolina State University (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chopra, A.K., Singh, M.P.: Constitutive Interoperability. In: 7th International Joint Conference on AAMAS, vol. 2, pp. 797–804. ACM Press, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chopra, A.K., Singh, M.P.: Multiagent Commitment Alignment. In: 8th International Joint Conference on AAMAS, vol. 2, pp. 937–944. ACM Press, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chopra, A.K., Singh, M.P.: Nonmonotonic Commitment Machines. In: Dignum, F. (ed.) ACL 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2922, pp. 183–200. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.A.: Model Checking. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Desai, N., Chopra, A.K., Singh, M.P.: Representing and Reasoning About Commitments in Business Processes. In: 22nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1328–1333 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Emerson, E.A., Halpern, J.Y.: Sometimes and Not Never, Revisited: on Branching versus Linear Time Temporal Logic. Journal of ACM 33(1), 151–178 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Huhns, M., Bridgeland, D.M.: Multi-Agent Truth Maintenance. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 21(6) (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fornara, N., Colombetti, M.: Operational Specification of a Commitment-based Agent Communication Language. In: 1st International Joint Conference on AAMAS, pp. 535–542 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fornara, N., Viganò, F., Verdicchio, M., Colombetti, M.: Artificial Institutions: A Model of Institutional Reality for Open Multiagent Systems. AI and Law 16(1), 89–105 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lomuscio, A., Raimondi, F.: MCMAS: A Model Checker for Multi-Agent Systems. In: Hermanns, H., Palsberg, J. (eds.) TACAS 2006. LNCS, vol. 3920, pp. 450–454. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Mallya, A.U., Yolum, P., Singh, M.P.: Resolving Commitments among Autonomous Agents. In: Dignum, F.P.M. (ed.) ACL 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2922, pp. 166–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mallya, A.U., Singh, M.P.: An Algebra for Commitment Protocols. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 14(2), 143–163 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. El-Menshawy, M., Bentahar, J., Dssouli, R.: A New Semantics of Social Commitments using Branching Space-Time Logic. In: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT 2009), Logics for Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 3, pp. 492–496 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shakil, M.K., Yves, L.: On the Semantics of Conditional Commitment. In: 5th International Joint Confernce on AAMAS, pp. 1337–1344 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Singh, M.P.: An Ontology for Commitments in Multi-Agent Systems: Toward a Unification of Normative Concepts. AI and Law 7, 97–113 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Singh, M.P.: A Social Semantics for Agent Communication Languages. In: Dignum, F.P.M., Greaves, M. (eds.) Issues in Agent Communication. LNCS, vol. 1916, pp. 31–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Singh, M.P.: Semantical Considerations on Dialectical and Pratical Commitments. In: 23rd AAAI Confernce on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 176–181 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Singh, M.P.: Agent Communication Languages: Rethinking the Principles. IEEE Computer 31(12), 40–47 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Telang, P.R., Singh, M.P.: Business Modeling via Commitments. In: Vo, Q.B. (ed.) SOCASE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5907, pp. 111–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Torroni, P., Chesani, F., Mello, P., Montali, M.: Social Commitments in Time: Satisfied or Compensated. In: Baldoni, M., van Riemsdijk, M.B. (eds.) DALT 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5948, pp. 232–247. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wooldridge, M.: Computationally Grounded Theories of Agency. In: 4th International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 2000). IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Venkatraman, M., Singh, M.P.: Verifying Compliance with Commitment Protocols: Enabling Open Web-Based Multiagent Systems. In: The Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 3, pp. 217–236 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Verdicchio, M., Colombetti, M.: A Logical Model of Social Commitment for Agent Communication. In: Dignum, F.P.M. (ed.) ACL 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2922, pp. 128–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yolum, P., Singh, M.P.: Flexible Protocol Specification and Execution: Applying Event Calculus Planning using Commitments. In: 2nd International Joint Confernce on AAMAS, pp. 527–534 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yolum, P.: Design Time Analysis of Multi-Agent Protocols. Journal of Data Knowladge Engineering 63(1), 137–154 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

El-Menshawy, M., Bentahar, J., Dssouli, R. (2010). Verifiable Semantic Model for Agent Interactions Using Social Commitments. In: Dastani, M., El Fallah Segrouchni, A., Leite, J., Torroni, P. (eds) Languages, Methodologies, and Development Tools for Multi-Agent Systems. LADS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6039. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13338-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13338-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13337-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13338-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics