Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 295))

Abstract

A common practice to capture functional requirements of a software system is to utilize use-cases, which are textual descriptions of system usage scenarios written in a natural language. Since the substantial information about the system is captured by the use-cases, it comes as a natural idea to generate from these descriptions the implementation of the system (at least partially). However, the fact that the use-cases are in a natural language makes this task extremely difficult. In this paper, we describe a model-driven tool allowing code of a system to be generated from use-cases in plain English. The tool is based on the model-driven development paradigm, which makes it modular and extensible, so as to allow for use-cases in multiple language styles and generation for different component frameworks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ambriola, V., Gervasi, V.: On the systematic analysis of natural language requirements with circe. Automated Software Engineering (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Becker, S., Koziolek, H., Reussner, R.: The Palladio component model for model-driven performance prediction. Journal of Systems and Software 82, 3–22 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Breaux, T., Anton, A.: Analyzing goal semantics for rights, permissions and obligations. In: RE 2005: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, pp. 177–188. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2005), http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/RE.2005.12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Breaux, T., Anton, A.: Deriving semantic models from privacy policies. In: POLICY 2005: Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks, pp. 67–76. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2005), http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/POLICY.2005.12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruneton, E., Coupaye, T., Stefani, J.B.: The Fractal Component Model, http://fractal.ow2.org/specification/

  6. Bures, T., Carlson, J., Crnkovic, I., Sentilles, S., Vulgarakis, A.: ProCom - the Progress Component Model Reference Manual, version 1.0. Technical Report, Mälardalen University (2008), http://www.mrtc.mdh.se/index.php?choice=publications&id=1508

  7. Bures, T., Hnetynka, P., Plasil, F.: SOFA 2.0: Balancing Advanced Features in a Hierarchical Component Model. In: Proceedings of SERA 2006, Seattle, USA, pp. 40–48 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Open SOA Collaboration: SCA Service Component Architecture: Assembly Model Specification (2007), http://www.osoa.org/download/attachments/35/SCA_AssemblyModel_V100.pdf?version=1

  9. Cregan, A., Schwitter, R., Meyer, T.: Sydney OWL syntax-towards a controlled natural language syntax for OWL 1.1. In: Proceedings of the OWLED 2007 Workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions, Innsbruck, Austria, vol. 258 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Denger, C., Berry, D., Kamsties, E.: Higher quality requirements specifications through natural language patterns. In: Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Software - Science, Technology and Engineering, pp. 80–91. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Drazan, J., Vladimir, M.: Improved processing of textual use cases: Deriving behavior specifications. In: van Leeuwen, J., Italiano, G.F., van der Hoek, W., Meinel, C., Sack, H., Plášil, F. (eds.) SOFSEM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4362, pp. 856–868. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Eclipse.org: Eclipse Modelling Framework, http://www.eclipse.org/emf

  13. Francu, J., Hnetynka, P.: Automated Code Generation from System Requirements in Natural Language. e-Informatica Software Engineering Journal 3(1), 72–88 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Object Management Group: CORBA Component Model Specification, Version 4.0 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Object Management Group: Meta Object Facility (MOF) 2.0 Query/View/Transformation Specification (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jouault, F., Allilaire, F., Bezivin, J., Kurtev, I., Valduriez, P.: ATL: a QVT-like transformation language. In: OOPSLA Companion, pp. 719–720 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kaljurand, K., Fuchs, N.E.: Verbalizing Owl in Attempto Controlled English. In: Proceedings of the OWLED 2007 Workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions, Innsbruck, Austria, vol. 258 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Konrad, S., Cheng, B.: Real-time specification patterns. In: ICSE 2005: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Software engineering, pp. 372–381. ACM, New York (2005), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1062455.1062526

    Google Scholar 

  19. Larman, C.: Applying UML and Patterns: An Introduction to Object-Oriented Analysis and Design and Iterative Development, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. MacDonell, S.G., Min, K., Connor, A.M.: Autonomous requirements specification processing using natural language processing. In: Proceedings of the ISCA 14th International Conference on Intelligent and Adaptive Systems and Software Engineering (IASSE 2005), pp. 266–270. ISCA, Toronto (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mencl, V.: Deriving behavior specifications from textual use cases. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Intelligent Technologies for Software Engineering (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mencl, V., Francu, J., Ondrusek, J., Fiedler, M., Plsek, A.: Procasor environment: Interactive environment for requirement specification (2005), http://dsrg.mff.cuni.cz/~mencl/procasor-env/

  23. Oracle (Sun Microsystems): Java Platform, Enterprise Edition (Java EE): Enterprise JavaBeans Technology, http://java.sun.com/products/ejb/

  24. Obeo: Acceleo: Open source plugin for model to text transformation based on templates, http://www.acceleo.org

  25. van Ommering, R., van der Linden, F., Kramer, J., Magee, J.: The Koala Component Model for Consumer Electronics Software. Computer 33(3), 78–85 (2000), http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/2.825699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Plasil, F., Mencl, V.: Getting ‘whole picture’ behavior in a use case model. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science 7(4), 63–79 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Plasil, F., Visnovsky, S.: Behavior protocols for software components. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28(11), 1056–1076 (2002), http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/TSE.2002.1049404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rash, J.L., Hinchey, M.G., Rouff, C.A., Gracanin, D., Erickson, J.: A requirements-based programming approach to developing a NASA autonomous ground control system. Artif. Intell. Rev. 25(4), 285–297 (2007), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10462-007-9029-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Seresh, S.M., Ormandjieva, O.: Automated assistance for use cases elicitation from user requirements text. In: Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on Requirements Engineering (WER 2008), 16, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 128–139 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Smith, R., Avrunin, G., Clarke, L., Osterweil, L.: Propel: An approach supporting property elucidation. In: 24th Intl. Conf. on Software Engineering, pp. 11–21. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stahl, T., Voelter, M., Czarnecki, K.: Model-Driven Software Development: Technology, Engineering, Management. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Szyperski, C.: Component Software: Beyond Object-Oriented Programming, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (2002) (Hardcover)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zeng, Y.: Recursive object model (ROM)-Modelling of linguistic information in engineering design. Comput. Ind. 59(6), 612–625 (2008), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2008.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Šimko, V., Hnětynka, P., Bureš, T. (2010). From Textual Use-Cases to Component-Based Applications. In: Lee, R., Ma, J., Bacon, L., Du, W., Petridis, M. (eds) Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing 2010. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 295. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13265-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13265-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13264-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13265-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics