Skip to main content

Persuasive Dialogue Based on a Narrative Theory: An ECA Implementation

  • Conference paper

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNISA,volume 6137)

Abstract

Embodied Conversational Agents (ECA) are poised to constitute a specific category within persuasive systems, in particular through their ability to support affective dialogue. One possible approach consists in using ECA as virtual coaches or personal assistants and to make persuasion part of a dialogue game implementing specific argumentation or negotiation features. In this paper, we explore an alternative framework, which emerges from the long-term development of ECA as “Companions” supporting free conversation with the user, rather than task-oriented dialogue. Our system aims at influencing user attitudes as part of free conversation, albeit on a limited set of topics. We describe the implementation of a Companion ECA to which the user reports on his working day, and which can assess the user’s emotional attitude towards daily events in the office, trying to influence such attitude using affective strategies derived from a narrative model. This discussion is illustrated through examples from a first fully-implemented prototype.

Keywords

  • Affective Dialogue Systems
  • Persuasive Dialogue
  • Embodied Conversational Agents
  • Attitude Persuasive Systems

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13226-1_25
  • Chapter length: 12 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-642-13226-1
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. André, E., Dybkjær, L., Minker, W., Heisterkamp, P. (eds.): ADS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3068. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cavalluzzi, A., Carofiglio, V., de Rosis, F.: Affective Advice Giving Dialogs. In: André, E., Dybkjær, L., Minker, W., Heisterkamp, P. (eds.) ADS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3068, pp. 77–88. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hernández, A., López, B., Pardo, D., Santos, R., Hernández, L., Relaño Gil, J., Rodríguez, M.C.: Modular definition of multimodal ECA communication acts to improve dialogue robustness and depth of intention. In: Heylen, D., Kopp, S., Marsella, S., Pelachaud, C., Vilhjálmsson, H. (eds.) AAMAS 2008 Workshop on Functional Markup Language (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heylen, D., Kopp, S., Marsella, S., Pelachaud, C., Vilhjálmsson, H.H.: The Next Step towards a Function Markup Language. In: Prendinger, H., Lester, J.C., Ishizuka, M. (eds.) IVA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5208, pp. 270–280. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Tørning, K., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Persuasive system design: state of the art and future directions. In: Proceedings of the fourth International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Persuasive 2009, New York, NY, USA, vol. 350 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cavazza, M., Santos de la Camara, R., Turunen, M., and the Companions consortium: How was your day? A Companion ECA. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2010, accepted for publication (demonstration paper), Toronto (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith, C., Cavazza, M., Charlton, D., Zhang, L., Turunen, M., Hakulinen, J.: Integrating Planning and Dialogue in a Lifestyle Agent. In: Prendinger, H., Lester, J.C., Ishizuka, M. (eds.) IVA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5208, pp. 146–153. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Bickmore, T., Sidner, C.L.: Towards Plan-based Health Behavior Change Counseling Systems. In: Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Argumentation for Consumers of Healthcare, Stanford, CA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Prochaska, J., Di Clemente, C., Norcross, H.: In search of how people change: applications to addictive behavior. Americal Psychologist 47, 1102–1114 (1992)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Grasso, F., Cawsey, A., Jones, R.: Dialectical argumentation to solve conflicts in advice giving: a case study in the promotion of healthy nutrition. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 53, 1077–1115 (2000)

    MATH  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Tørning, K.: Persuasive Technology Design – A Rhetorical Approach. In: Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Hasle, P., Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5033, pp. 83–93. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Bremond, C.: Logique du Recit. Editions du Seuil, Paris (1973) (in French)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roland, B.: Rhétorique de l’image. Communications 4, 40–51 (1964) (in French)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakasone, A., Ishizuka, M.: SRST: A Storytelling Model Using Rhetorical Relations. In: Göbel, S., Malkewitz, R., Iurgel, I. (eds.) TIDSE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4326, pp. 127–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. Marsella, G., Gratch, J.: Modeling Coping Behavior in Virtual Humans: Don’t Worry, Be Happy. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2003, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 313–320 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pizzi, D., Charles, F., Lugrin, J.-L., Cavazza, M.: Interactive Storytelling with Literary Feelings. In: Paiva, A.C.R., Prada, R., Picard, R.W. (eds.) ACII 2007. LNCS, vol. 4738, pp. 630–641. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. Appelt, D.E.: Planning English Sentences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. Nau, D., Ghallab, M., Traverso, P.: Automated Planning: Theory & Practice. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Traum, D.R., Robinson, S., Stephan, J.: Evaluation of multi-party virtual reality dialogue interaction. In: Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 1699–1702 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moilanen, K., Pulman, S.: Sentiment Composition. In: Proceedings of the Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing International Conference (RANLP 2007), Borovets, pp. 378–382 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Strapparava, C., Mihalcea, R.: SemEval-2007 Task 14: Affective Text. In: The Proceedings of the fourth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval 2007), Association for Computational Linguistics, Prague, pp. 70–74 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hu, M., Liu, B.: Mining and Summarizing Customer Reviews. In: The Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2004), Association for Computing Machinery, Seattle, pp. 168–177 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cavazza, M. et al. (2010). Persuasive Dialogue Based on a Narrative Theory: An ECA Implementation. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds) Persuasive Technology. PERSUASIVE 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6137. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13226-1_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13226-1_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13225-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13226-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)