Managing and Modeling the Combination of Resources in Professional Sporting Events

Chapter

Abstract

With a view towards integrating the Business Model concept into Resource-Based thinking, this research paper questions the concept with respect to its potential for formalizing a firm’s resource arrangement and control methods. The clinical study of three cases of international sporting event organization (Roland Garros, BNP Paribas Masters and Open13) enables a comparison of Business Models which rely on the same pool of resources but which structure and manage them differently. The main result identified in the context of an unstable sports environment, is the importance of such organizations’ aptitude to deploy and control resources which have been built up with certain stakeholders. Beyond the comparison of different Business Models within a similar environment, an empirical sequential approach for building up and managing a firm’s assets is suggested. The analysis of the development of each Business Model also enables us to understand how strategies for limiting the dependence of an organization on the reputation of its main suppliers are rolled out.

Referneces

  1. Amis, J. (2003). Good things come to those wait: The strategic management of image and reputation at Guiness. European Sport Management Quarterly, 3(3), 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 493–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bingham, C. B., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2008). Position, leverage an opportunity: A typology of strategic logics linking resources with competitive advantage. Management and Decision Economics, 29, 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Black, J., & Boal, K. (1994). Strategic resources: Traits, configurations and paths to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blyler, M., & Coff, R. W. (2003). Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: Ties that split pies. Strategic Management Journal, 24(7), 677–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chesbrough, H., & Rosembloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox corporation’s Technology Spinoff Companies (Working Paper). Harvard Business School, 01-002.Google Scholar
  9. Coff, R. W. (1999). When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organization Science, 10(2), 119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Durand, R. (2006). Organizational evolution and strategic management. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.Google Scholar
  12. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
  13. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fombrun, C. J., & Van Riel, C. B. M. (2004). Fame fortune. How successful companies build winning reputations. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Freiling, J. (2008). RBV and the road to the control of external organizations. Management Revue, 19(1–2), 33–52.Google Scholar
  16. Godfrey, P. C., & Hill, C. W. L. (1995). The problem of unobservables in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 519–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grant, R. M. (1991). Resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implication for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (1998). Introduction to action research, social research for social change. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Hamel, G. (2002). Leading the revolution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  21. Haspeslagh, P. C., & Jemison, D. B. (1991). Managing acquisitions – Creating value through corporate renewal. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hayward, M. L. A., Rindova, V. P., & Pollock, T. G. (2004). Believing one’s own press: The causes and consequences of CEO celebrity. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 637–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Helfat, C. E. (1997). Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 339–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henderson, R. M., & Cockburn, I. (1994). Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holcomb, T. R., Holmes, R. M., & Connely, B. L. (2009). Making the most of what you have: Managerial ability as a source of resource value creation. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 457–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kor, Y. Y., & Mahoney, J. T. (2005). How dynamics, management, and governance of resource deployments influence firm-level performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5), 489–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Lippman, S. A., & Rumelt, R. P. (2003). A bargaining perspective on resource advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 24(11), 1069–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Magretta, J. (2002). Why business matter. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 3–8.Google Scholar
  30. Mahoney, J. T. (1995). The management of resources and the resource of management. Journal of Business Research, 33, 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller, D., & Shamsie, J. (1996). The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 519–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morgan, R. M. (2000). Relationship marketing and marketing strategy: The evolution of relationship strategy within the organization. In J. Sheth & A. Parvatiyar (Eds.), Handbook of relationship marketing (pp. 481–504). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  33. Parent, M. M., & Foreman, P. O. (2007). Organizational image and identity management in large-scale sporting events. Journal of Sport Management, 21, 15–40.Google Scholar
  34. Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  35. Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organization – A resource dependence perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003. Originally published: New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  37. Porter, M. E. (2001, March). Strategy and the internet. Harvard Business Review, 79, 63–78.Google Scholar
  38. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990, May-June). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68, 79–91.Google Scholar
  39. Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Journal, 26(1), 22–40.Google Scholar
  40. Reed, R., & DeFilippi, R. J. (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 88–102.Google Scholar
  41. Rindova, V. P., & Fombrun, C. J. (1999). Constructing competitive advantage: The role of firm-constituent interactions. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 691–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rouse, M. J., & Daellenbach, U. S. (1999). Rethinking research methods for the resource-based perspective: Isolating sources of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 487–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rouse, M. J., & Daellenbach, U. S. (2002). More thinking research methods for the resource-based perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 963–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In R. Lamb (Ed.), Competitive strategic management (pp. 556–570). Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  45. Schultz, M., Hatch, M. J., & Larsen, M. H. (2000). The expressive organization. Linking identity, reputation and the corporate brand. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Shafer, S. M., Smith, J. H., & Linder, J. C. (2005). The power of business models. Business Horizons, 48, 199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sirmon, D. J., Gove, S., & Hitt, M. A. (2009). Resource management in dyadic competitive rivalry: The effect of resources bundling and deployment. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 919–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sirmon, D. J., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Srivastava, R. K., Fahey, L., & Christensen, H. K. (2001). The resource-based view and marketing: The role of market-based assets in gaining competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 27(6), 777–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Srivastava, R. K., Shervani, T. A., & Fahey, L. (1998). Market-based assets and shareholder value: A framework for analysis. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 2–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  52. Tapscott, D. (2001). Rethinking strategy in a networked world. Strategy+Business, 24, 1–8.Google Scholar
  53. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Timmers, P. (1998). Business models for electronic markets. Electronic Market, 8(2), 2–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Venkatraman, N., & Henderson, J. C. (1998). Real strategies for virtual organizing. Sloan Management Review, 40(1), 33–48.Google Scholar
  57. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Whyte, W. F. (1991). Participatory action research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Applied social research method series: Vol. 5. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  60. Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2007). Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 18(2), 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-VerlagBerlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Paul Cezanne University, Aix-MarseilleMarseilleFrance
  2. 2.Euromed ManagementMarseilleFrance

Personalised recommendations