E-Learning across Cultural Boundaries: A European Perspective on Technology Acceptance

  • Nicolae Nistor
  • Maximilian Wagner
  • Emese Istvanffy
  • Maria Dragotă
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 73)


This study starts by questioning the e-learning transfer between countries by merely translating the text into a different language. We apply and thus verify the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT, [1]), which has not yet been sufficiently empirically validated [2]. Our bi-cultural sample encompasses N = 732 undergraduate and graduate students aged under 30, from Romania and Germany. As a first result, we offer empirical evidence for UTAUT on a wider basis. Secondly, we extend the UTAUT model by the moderator geographic location; the acceptance mechanisms appear to be different in the two sub-samples. Thirdly, a cluster analysis confirms the intercultural differences in the technology acceptance variables. Finally, we conclude that the transfer of e-learning concepts and contents from the old to the more recent EU member countries requires much more than simple translation; acceptance factors are a first aspect to consider.


Technology acceptance UTAUT intercultural factors e-learning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27, 425–478 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Straub, E.T.: Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research 79, 625–649 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bandura, A.: Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Compeau, D., Higgins, C.A., Huff, S.: Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computer technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly 23, 145–158 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M.: Attitudes and the attitude-behaviour relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. European Review of Social Psychology 11, 1–33 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis, F.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Teo, T.: Is there an attitude problem? Reconsidering the role of attitude in the TAM. British Journal of Educational Technology 40, 1139–1141 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Asandului, L., Ceobanu, C.: E-Learning in Romanian higher education: a case study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 9, 162–175 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nistor, N., Banciu, D., Jalobeanu, M.: E-learning at Romanian universities: Dealing with essential changes of society and culture. In: Dittler, U., Kahler, H., Kindt, M., Schwarz, C. (eds.) E-learning in Europe - Learning Europe. How have new media contributed to the development of higher education? pp. 251–270. Waxmann, Münster (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li, N., Kirkup, G.: Gender and cultural differences in Internet use: A study of China and the UK. Computers & Education 48, 301–317 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolae Nistor
    • 1
  • Maximilian Wagner
    • 1
  • Emese Istvanffy
    • 2
  • Maria Dragotă
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Psychology and Educational SciencesLudwig-Maximilians-UniversitätMünchenGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of Psychology and Educational SciencesBabeş-Bolyai UniversityCluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations