Using Automated Assessment Feedback to Enhance the Quality of Student Learning in Universities: A Case Study
There are many different ways of providing university students with feedback on their assessment performance, ranging from written checklists and handwritten commentaries to individual verbal feedback. Regardless of whether the feedback is summative or formative in nature, it is widely recognized that providing consistent, meaningful written feedback to students on assessment performance is not a simple task, particularly where a module is delivered by a team of staff. Typical student complaints about such feedback include: inconsistency of comment between lecturers; illegible handwriting; difficulty in relating feedback to assessment criteria; and vague remarks. For staff themselves, there is the problem that written comments, to be of any benefit to students, are immensely time-consuming. This paper illustrates, through a case study, the enormous benefits of Automated Assessment Feedback for staff and students. A clear strategy on how to develop an automated assessment feedback system, using the simplest of technologies, is provided.
KeywordsAutomated Feedback Assessments Students Universities
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Fowler, H.W., Fowler, F.G.: The Concise Oxford Dictionary. Oxford University Press, London (1964)Google Scholar
- 4.Hewitt, P., Lentell, H., Phillips, M., Stevens, V.: How do I know I’m Doing a good job? Open Teaching Toolkit. Open University, Milton Keynes (1997)Google Scholar
- 6.Debuse, J., Lawley, M., Shibl, R.: The Implementation of an Automated Assessment Feedback and Quality Assurance System for ICT Courses. Journal of Information Systems Education (JISE) 18(4), 491–502 (2007)Google Scholar
- 7.Chirwa, L.C.: A Case Study on the Impact of Automated Assessment in Engineering Mathematics. Journal of the Higher Education Academy 3(1), 13–20 (2008)Google Scholar
- 9.Stanley, K.A.: The Role of Handwriting in ESL Written Assessment, Masters Thesis, Concordia University (1999)Google Scholar
- 12.Sutton, P.: Towards Dialogic Feedback. Critical and Reflective Practice in Education 1(1), 1–10 (2009)Google Scholar