Advertisement

Assessment of Andragogical Attributes of Distance Learners

  • Rugayah Gy Hashim
  • Hashim Ahmad
  • Nor’Aini Ahmad
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 73)

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to assess the andragogical attribute of adult students engaged in distance learning, specifically, with regards to the main construct, cognitive engagement versus academic achievement. Five hundred students were sampled and the response rate was 33.8%. From the analyses, the overall mean score for cognitive engagement is 3.75 from a scale of one to seven. The results indicated that knowledge gained through the e-distance learning is low and this evidence correlates to the average academic performance or CGPA of the respondents, which is between 2.50-2.99. The findings indicated a low level of integration and motivation in learning and consequently it is suggested that training programs and additional course revisions be integrated into the curriculum to ensure the chances of student success and reduce attrition rate.

Keywords

Andragogy adult students distance education e-learning deep learning surface learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beins, B.C.: Research Methods: A Tool for Life. Pearson, Boston (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biggs, J.B., Tang, C.: Teaching for quality learning at university. Maidenhead, Open University Press/McGraw-Hill Education (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Champagne, M.V.: Embedded assessment: An evaluation tool for the web-based learning environment. In: Duffy and Kirkley (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Corno, L., Mandinach, E.B.: The role of cognitive engagement in class room learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist 18(2), 88–108 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dahan, H.M., Baba, J.: A qualitative approach to adult learners’ understanding of a supportive learning environment: A case study. Malaysian Journal of University Education 1(1), 33–46 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Duffy, T.M., Kirkley, J.R. (eds.): Learner-centered theory and practice in distance education: Cases from higher education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Duffy, T.M., Kirkley, J.R.: Learning theory and pedagogy applied in distance learning: The case of Cardean University. In: Duffy and Kirkley (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eoyang, C.: Promises and challenges of web-based education. In: Duffy and Kirkley (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heiman, G.W.: Understanding Research Methods and Statistics: An Integrated Introduction for Psychology, 2nd edn. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jackson, S.: Research methods and statistics: A critical thinking approach. Wadsworth, Belmont (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnstone, S.M.: A policy on learning theory and practice in distance education. In: Duffy and Kirkley (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jurow, A.S.: Shifting engagements in configured worlds: Middle school mathematics students’ participation in an architectural design project. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 14(1), 35–67 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Poon, W.C., Low, K.L.-T., Yong, D.G.-F.: A Study of Web-based Learn-ing Environment in Malaysia. The International Journal of Educational Management 18(6), 374–385 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Richardson, J.C., Newby, T.: The role of students’ cognitive engagement in online learning. The American Journal of Distance Education 20(1), 23–37 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ruhleder, K.: Interaction and engagement in LEEP: Understanding “Distance” education at the graduate level. In: Duffy and Kirkley (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schierholz, R., Glissmann, S., Kolbe, L.M., Brenner, W.: Don’t call us, we’ll call you – Performance Measurement in Multi-Channel Environments. Journal of Information Science and Technology 3(2), 44–61 (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Selwyn, N., Gorard, S., Furlong, J.: Adult learning in the digital age: Information technology and the learning society. Routledge, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stangor, C.: Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd edn. Houghton Mifflin, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
    Volery, T., Lord, D.: Critical Success Factors in Online Education. The International Journal of Educational Management 14(5), 216–223Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Warburton, K.: Deep Learning and Education for Sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 4(1), 44–56 (2000/2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yorke, M., Longden, B.: Retention and student success in higher education. Open University Press, London (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rugayah Gy Hashim
    • 1
  • Hashim Ahmad
    • 1
  • Nor’Aini Ahmad
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies, Institute of Educational DevelopmentUniversiti Teknologi MARAShah Alam, SelangorMalaysia

Personalised recommendations