Abstract
Though agile methodologies have gained widespread acceptance in the past decade, there are still a number of potential adopters who are yet to join the critical mass. Some of these adopters need assurance of whether agile software methodologies will continue to be the dominant software process technology of the 2010s and beyond. This study applies the Software Engineering Process Technologies Adoption Grid proposed by Fichman & Kemerer [3] to evaluate the adoption trajectory of agile software development (ASD) methodologies. The study concludes that ASD methodologies will continue to be the dominant software process technology of the 2010’s, and adopted by more business organizations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bahli, B., Zeid, E.S.A.: The role of knowledge creation in adopting extreme programming model: an empirical study. In: ITI 3rd international Conference on Information and Communiations Technologies for the New Knowledge Society (2005)
Dyba, T., Dingsoyr, T.: Empirical studies of Agile Software Development: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology 50, 833–859 (2008)
Fichman, R.G., Kemerer, C.F.: Adoption of Software Engineering Process Innovations: The Case of Object Orientation. Sloan Management Review 34(2), 7–22 (1993)
Highsmith, J.: Agile Software Development Ecosystems. In: Cockburn, A., Highsmith, J. (eds.) The Agile Software Development Series, Addison-Wesley, Boston (2002)
Ilieva, S., Ivanov, P., Stefanova, E.: Analyses of an agile methodology implementation. In: Proceedings 30th Euromicro Conference, pp. 326–333. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2004)
Johnson, R.: Object-Oriented Systems Development: A review of empirical research. Communications of the ACM 8, 65–81 (2002)
Layman, L., Williams, L., Cunningham, L.: Exploring extreme programming in context: An industrial case study Agile Development Conference. In: ADC (2004)
Lindstrom, L., Jeffries, R.: Extreme Programming and Agile Software Development Methodologies. Information Systems Management 21(3), 41–52 (2004)
Lindvall, M., Basili, V.R., Boehm, B.: Empirical Findings in Agile Methods. In: Proceedings of XP Agile Universe (2002)
Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York (2003)
SA09. Scrum Guide, Scrum Alliance (2009), http://www.scrumalliance.org/resources
Sridhar, N., Radhakanta, M.: Challenges of Migrating to Agile Methodologies. Communications of the ACM 48(5), 73–78 (2005)
Vijayasarathy, L.R., Turk, D.: Agile Software Development: A survey of early adopters. Journal of Information Technology Management 19(2) (2008)
Tessem: Experiences in learning XP practices: a qualitative study. In: Marchesi, M., Succi, G. (eds.) XP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2675, pp. 131–137. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Wellington, C.A., Briggs, T., Girard, C.D.: Comparison of student experiences with plan-driven and agile methodologies. In: Proceedings of the 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (2005)
Moore, G.A.: Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling High-Tech products to Mainstream customers, New York, Harper-Collins (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Senapathi, M. (2010). Adoption of Software Engineering Process Innovations: The Case of Agile Software Development Methodologies. In: Sillitti, A., Martin, A., Wang, X., Whitworth, E. (eds) Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming. XP 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 48. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13054-0_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13054-0_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13053-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13054-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)