Skip to main content

Adoption of Software Engineering Process Innovations: The Case of Agile Software Development Methodologies

  • Conference paper
Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming (XP 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 48))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Though agile methodologies have gained widespread acceptance in the past decade, there are still a number of potential adopters who are yet to join the critical mass. Some of these adopters need assurance of whether agile software methodologies will continue to be the dominant software process technology of the 2010s and beyond. This study applies the Software Engineering Process Technologies Adoption Grid proposed by Fichman & Kemerer [3] to evaluate the adoption trajectory of agile software development (ASD) methodologies. The study concludes that ASD methodologies will continue to be the dominant software process technology of the 2010’s, and adopted by more business organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bahli, B., Zeid, E.S.A.: The role of knowledge creation in adopting extreme programming model: an empirical study. In: ITI 3rd international Conference on Information and Communiations Technologies for the New Knowledge Society (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dyba, T., Dingsoyr, T.: Empirical studies of Agile Software Development: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology 50, 833–859 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fichman, R.G., Kemerer, C.F.: Adoption of Software Engineering Process Innovations: The Case of Object Orientation. Sloan Management Review 34(2), 7–22 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Highsmith, J.: Agile Software Development Ecosystems. In: Cockburn, A., Highsmith, J. (eds.) The Agile Software Development Series, Addison-Wesley, Boston (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ilieva, S., Ivanov, P., Stefanova, E.: Analyses of an agile methodology implementation. In: Proceedings 30th Euromicro Conference, pp. 326–333. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson, R.: Object-Oriented Systems Development: A review of empirical research. Communications of the ACM 8, 65–81 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Layman, L., Williams, L., Cunningham, L.: Exploring extreme programming in context: An industrial case study Agile Development Conference. In: ADC (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lindstrom, L., Jeffries, R.: Extreme Programming and Agile Software Development Methodologies. Information Systems Management 21(3), 41–52 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lindvall, M., Basili, V.R., Boehm, B.: Empirical Findings in Agile Methods. In: Proceedings of XP Agile Universe (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. SA09. Scrum Guide, Scrum Alliance (2009), http://www.scrumalliance.org/resources

  12. Sridhar, N., Radhakanta, M.: Challenges of Migrating to Agile Methodologies. Communications of the ACM 48(5), 73–78 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vijayasarathy, L.R., Turk, D.: Agile Software Development: A survey of early adopters. Journal of Information Technology Management 19(2) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tessem: Experiences in learning XP practices: a qualitative study. In: Marchesi, M., Succi, G. (eds.) XP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2675, pp. 131–137. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Wellington, C.A., Briggs, T., Girard, C.D.: Comparison of student experiences with plan-driven and agile methodologies. In: Proceedings of the 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moore, G.A.: Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling High-Tech products to Mainstream customers, New York, Harper-Collins (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Senapathi, M. (2010). Adoption of Software Engineering Process Innovations: The Case of Agile Software Development Methodologies. In: Sillitti, A., Martin, A., Wang, X., Whitworth, E. (eds) Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming. XP 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 48. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13054-0_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13054-0_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13053-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13054-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics