Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Die Geburtshilfe pp 111–123Cite as

Grundlagen diagnostischer Tests und Screeningverfahren

  • Chapter

  • 7491 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Um diagnostische Verfahren sinnvoll einsetzen zu können, müssen zunächst die Testqualitäten Sensitivität und Spezifität bekannt sein. Bei der Interpretation von Testergebnissen sollte die Prätestwahrscheinlichkeit oder Prävalenz der vermuteten Erkrankung berücksichtigt werden, um den prädiktiven Wert möglichst realistisch abschätzen zu können. Die Schätzung der Prätestwahrscheinlichkeit kann auf persönlichen klinischen Erfahrungen oder auf publizierten Daten beruhen. Hierbei sind aber typische Schätzfehler zu berücksichtigen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Literatur

  • Bayes T (1763) An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philos Trans R Soc London 53: 370–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein J (1997) Test-indication curves. Med Dec Making 17: 103–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers I (1989) Evaluating the effects of care during pregnancy and childbirth. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC (eds) Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford University Press, pp 3–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers I (1993) Scientific inquiry and authoritarianism in perinatal care and education. Birth 10: 151–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC (eds) (1989) Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Choolani M, Narasinhan K, Kolla V, Hahn S (2009) Proteomic technologies for prenatal diagnostics: advances and challenges ahead. Expert Rev Proteomics 6: 87–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eddy DM (1988) Variations in physician practice: the role of uncertainty. In: Dowie J, Elstein A (eds) Professional judgment. A reader in clinical decision making. Cambridge University Press, pp 45–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy DM (1991) Common screening tests. American College of Physicians, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Enkin M (1996) The need for evidence-based obstetrics. Evidence- Based Med 1: 132–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan TJ (1975) Nomogram for Bayes’s theorem. N Engl J Med 293: 257

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Wagner EH (1988) Clinical epidemiology: the essentials, 2nd edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen RS, Gambino SR (1979) Norm und Normabweichung klinischer Daten: Der pradiktive Wert und die Effizienz von medizinischen Diagnosen. Fischer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant A (1989) Monitoring the fetus during labour. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M, and Keirse MJNC (eds) Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford University Press, vol 2, pp 846–882

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz J (1988) Why doctors don’t disclose uncertainty. In: Dowie J, Elstein A (eds) Professional judgment. A reader in clinical decision making. Cambridge University Press, pp 544–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhns LR, Thornbury JR, Fryback DG (1989) Decision making in imaging. Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzl R (1996) Effizienz der klinischen Untersuchungen in der Schwangerenvorsorge. Gynakologe 29: 541–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Last JM (1988) A dictionary of epidemiology, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Marteau TM, Cook R, Kidd J, Michie S, Johnston M, Slack J, Shaw RW (1992) The psychological effects of false-positive results in prenatal screening for fetal abnormality: a prospective study. Prenat Diagn 12: 205–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer KB, Pauker SG (1987) Screening for HIV: Can we afford the false positive rate? N Engl J Med 317: 238–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mohide P, Grant A (1989) Evaluating diagnosis and screening during pregnancy and childbirth. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC (eds) Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford University Press, vol 1, pp 66–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogino S, Wilson RB (2004) Bayesian analysis and risk assessment in genetic counseling and testing. J Mol Diagn 6: 1–9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pauker SG, Kassirer JP (1975) Therapeutic decision making: a costbenefit analysis. N Engl J Med 293: 229–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pauker SG, Kassirer JP (1980) The threshold approach to clinical decision making. N Engl J Med 302: 1109–1117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piattelli-Palmarini M (1994) Inevitable illusions. How mistakes of reason rule our minds. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson WS (1997) Evidence-based diagnosis: More is needed. Evidence- Based Med 2: 70–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P (1991) Clinical epidemiology. A basic science for clinical medicine, 2nd edn. Little & Brown, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett DL, Straus S, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB (2000) Evidence-based medicine. How to practice & teach EBM, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh. Deutsche Ausgabe: Evidenzbasierte Medizin. EBM-Umsetzung und -vermittlung. Bearb. von R. Kunz und L. Fritsche (1999) Zuckschwerdt, Germering/ Munchen

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler M (1997) Serum screening for Down’s syndrome: how much do health professionals know? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 144: 176–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider H (1996) Intensivuberwachung des Feten sub partu oder die Qualitat klinischer Forschung. Geburtsh Frauenheilkd 56: 397–400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sox HC (1986) Probability theory in the use of diagnostic tests. Application to critical study of the literature. Ann Intern Med 104: 60–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sox HC (1987) Common diagnostic tests. Use and interpretation. American College of Physicians, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Sox HC, Blatt MA, Higgins MC, Marton KI (1988) Medical decision making. Butterworth, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart-Brown S, Farmer A (1997) Screening could seriously damage your health. Decisions to screen must take account of the social and psychological costs. BMJ 314: 533–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thacker SB (1997) Lessons in technology diffusion: the electronic fetal monitoring experience. Birth 24: 58–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124–1131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein MC, Fineberg AV (1980) Clinical decision analysis. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildschut HIJ, Weiner CP, Peters TJ (1996) When to screen in obstetrics and gynecology. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Klinikum Innenstadt I, Maistraße 11, München, 80337

    Prof. Dr. med. R. Kürzl

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. med. R. Kürzl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Univ.Klinikum Bern Frauenklinik, Bern, Schweiz

    Henning Schneider

  2. Klinische Abt. Geburtshilfe und Feto-maternale Medizin, Medizinische Universität Wien Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde, Wien, Österreich

    Peter-Wolf Husslein

  3. Frauenklinik und Poliklinik Abt. Perinatalmedizin, TU München Klinikum Rechts der Isar, München, Deutschland

    Karl Theo Maria Schneider

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kürzl, R. (2011). Grundlagen diagnostischer Tests und Screeningverfahren. In: Schneider, H., Husslein, PW., Schneider, K. (eds) Die Geburtshilfe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12974-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12974-2_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40181-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12974-2

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation