Skip to main content

Noninvasive Imaging for Supporting Basic Research

  • Chapter
Small Animal Imaging

Abstract

Imaging has long been indispensable in clinical practice. Increasingly, in vivo imaging of small laboratory animals (i.e., mice and rats) has emerged as a critical component of preclinical biomedical research as well (Beckman et al. 2007; Cherry 2006; Gross and Piwnica-Worms 2006; Pomper 2005). Small-animal imaging provides a noninvasive means of assaying biological structure and function in vivo, yielding quantitative, spatially and temporally indexed information on normal and diseased tissues such as tumors. Importantly, because of its noninvasive nature, imaging allows serial (i.e., longitudinal) assay of rodent models of human cancer and cardiovascular, neurological, and other diseases over the entire natural history of the disease process, from inception to progression, and monitoring of the effectiveness of treatment or other interventions (with each animal serving as its own control and thereby reducing biological variability). This also serves to minimize the number of experimental animals required for a particular study. With the ongoing development of genetically engineered (i.e., transgenic and knock out) rodent models of cancer and other critical diseases (Malakoff 2000), such models are increasingly more realistic in recapitulating the natural history and clinical sequelae of the corresponding human disease and the ability to track these disease models long-term is therefore invaluable. Importantly, in contrast to cell or tissue culture-based experiments, studies in intact animals incorporate all of the interacting physiological factors – neuronal, hormonal, nutritional, immunological, etc. – present in the complex in vivo milieu. Intact whole-animal models also facilitate investigation of systemic aspects of disease such as cancer metastasis, which are difficult or impossible to replicate in ex vivo systems. Further, because many of the same imaging modalities – magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging (MRI and MRSI), positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), transmission computed tomography (CT), and ultrasound (US) – used in the clinic are also used in the laboratory setting, the findings of small-animal imaging are readily translatable to patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Fluorescence imaging is being pursued clinically in intraoperative, laparoscopic, and endoscopic settings, where there is no overlying tissue.

References

  • Beckman N, Kneuer R, Gremlcih HU et al (2007) In vivo mouse imaging and spectroscopy in drug discovery. NMR Biomed 20:154–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry S (2006) In-vivo whole-body imaging of the laboratory mouse. In: Fox J, Barthold S, Davisson M, Newcomer C, Quimby F, Smith A (eds) The mouse in biomedical research, vol 3 (Normative biology, husbandry, and models), 2nd edn. Elsevier Academic, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho HJ, Ackerstaff E, Carlin S et al (2009) Noninvasive multimodality imaging of the tumor microenvironment: registered dynamic MRI and PET studies of a preclinical tumor model of tumor hypoxia. Neoplasia 11:247–259

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Contag PR, Olomu IN, Stevenson DK (1998) Bioluminescent indicators in living mammals. Nat Med 4:245–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gross S, Piwnica-Worms D (2006) Molecular imaging strategies for drug discovery and development. Curr Opinion Chem Biol 10:334–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann U, Brix G, Knopp MV et al (1995) Pharmokinetic mapping of the breast: a new method for dynamic MR mammography. Magn Reson Med 33:506–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindner J (2004) Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions. Nature Rev Drug Discov 3:527–532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malakoff D (2000) Suppliers: the rise of the mouse, biomedicine’s model mammal. Science 288:248–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ntziachristos V, Tung CH, Bremer C et al (2002) Fluorescence molecular tomography resolves protease activity in vivo. Nat Med 8:757–760

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ntziachristos V, Ripoli J, Wang LV et al (2005) Looking and listening to light: the evolution of whole-body photonic imaging. Nat Biotechnol 23:313–320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pichler BJ, Wehrl HF, Kolb A et al (2008) Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging: the next generation of multi-modality imaging. Semin Nucl Med 38:199–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pomper MG (2001) Molecular imaging: an overview. Acad Radiol 8:1141–1153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pomper MG (2005) Translational molecular imaging for cancer. Cancer Imaging 5:S16–S26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland DJ, Cherry SR (2008) Small-animal nuclear medicine: Instrumentation and related considerationsin pre-clinical research. Semin Nucl Med 38:208–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Serganova I, Mayer-Kukuck HH et al (2008) Molecular imaging: reporter gene imaging. In: Semmler W, Schwaiger M (eds) Molecular imaging II. Handbook of experimental pathology 185/II. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Jones PM, Solit DB, Akhurst T et al (2004) The pharmacodynamics of HER2 degradation in response to HSP90 inhibitors can be imaged in animals with 68Ga labeled F(ab′)2 fragments of Herceptin. Nat Biotechnol 22:701–706

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wisner ER, Weichert JP, Longino M et al (2002) A surface-modified chylomicron remnant-like emulsion for percutaneous computed tomography lymphography: synthesis and preliminary imaging findings. Invest Radiol 37:232–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zanzonico P (2008) Multimodality image registration and fusion. In: Dhawan AP, Huang HK, Kim DS (eds) Principles and advanced methods in medical imaging and image analysis. World Scientific, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zanzonico, P. (2011). Noninvasive Imaging for Supporting Basic Research. In: Kiessling, F., Pichler, B. (eds) Small Animal Imaging. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12945-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12945-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12944-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12945-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics