Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dokumentation, Messung und Qualitätsmanagement

  • Chapter
NeuroRehabilitation

Zusammenfassung

Ist Qualität in der Medizin überhaupt messbar, wenn mehr als rein naturwissenschaftliche Fragestellungen vorliegen? Die Medizin und vor allem die Rehabilitation hat sich vielen Problemen zu stellen, die den naturwissenschaftlichen Rahmen sprengen. Die Frage, welche Relationen zwischen Quantität und Qualität bestehen, beschäftigt die Naturwissenschaft und Philosophie bis heute. Das Exaktheitsideal, das in der Naturwissenschaft herrscht, geht von der Funktionsfähigkeit und Aussagekraft zählbarer Kriterien aus. Was aber tun, wenn das Persönlichkeitsmerkmal, das Störungsbild oder die Qualität in der rehabilitativen Arbeit nicht einfach zähl- und messbar sind? Dann wird gerne als wissenschaftlich irrelevant erklärt, was sich durch Messinstrumente nicht erfassen lässt. Die Rehabilitation bewegt sich im Spannungsfeld zwischen dem naturwissenschaftlichen Exaktheitsideal einerseits und unzureichend erfassbaren Wertvorstellungen wie Lebensqualität, Befindlichkeit und Gesundheit andererseits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • The ALS CNTF treatment stuy (ACTS) phase I-II Study Group. The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale. Assessment of activities of daily living in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Arch Neurol 1996;53:141–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASIA. International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Patients. Revision. Chicago: American Spinal Injury Association; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams J et al. Measuring balance in the elderly preliminary development of an instrument. Physiother Can 1989;41:304–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 1987;67:206–207.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bollschweiler E. Leitlinien-Entwicklung. In: Lauterbach K, Schrappe M (Hrsg). Gesundheitsökonomie, Qualitätsmanagement und Evidence- based Medicine. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Medical Research Council. Aids to the investigation of peripheral nerve injuries. London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office; 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucher PO, Dommen-Nyffeler D, Rentsch HP. Die Umsetzung der ICF im Spannungsfeld von Kontext und neurorehabilitativer Intervention. Neurol Rehabil 2005;11:196–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger M. Erfassung der gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität mit dem SF-36 Health Survey. Rehabilitation 1996;35:XVII–XXX.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell WI, Lewis S. Visual analogue measurement of pain. Ulster Med J 1990;59:149–154.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Catz A, Itzkovich M, Tesio L et al. A multicenter international study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III: Rasch psychometric validation. Spinal Cord 2007;45:275–291.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cieza A, Ewert T, Ustun TB et al. Development of ICF Core Sets for patients with chronic conditions. J Rehabil Med 2004;44:9–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF et al. The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Int Disabil Stud 1991;13:50–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collin C, Wade D. Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990;53:576–579.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper P, Osborn M, Gath D et al. Evaluation of a modified self-report measure of social adjustment. Br J Psychiatry 1982;141:68–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsches Institut für Normung. Qualitätsmanagement und Statistik. Berlin: Beuth Verlag; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald CA, Ware JEJ. The measurement of social support. Res Communiy Ment Health 1984;4:325–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnabedian A. Exploration in Quality Assessment and Monitoring, Vol 1. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to its Assessment. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Health Administration Press; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorman PJ, Waddell F, Slattery J et al. Is the EuroQol a valid measure of health-related quality of life after stroke? Stroke 1997;28:1876–1882.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ewert T, Fuessl M, Cieza A et al. Identification of the most common patient problems in patients with chronic conditions using the ICF checklist. J Rehabil Med 2004;44:22–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fahn S, Elton R. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. In: Fahn S, Marsden CD, Calne DB (Hrsg), Parkinson's disease Vol 2. Florham Park, NJ: Macmillan Health Care Information; 1987. S. 153–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field M, Lohr K. Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines, directions of a new Programm. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frommelt P, Grötzbach H. Einführung der ICF in die Neurorehabilitation. Neurol Rehabil 2005;11:171–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fugl-Meyer A, Jaasko L, Leyman I et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient.1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975;7:13–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gill TM, Feinstein AR. A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-oflife measurements. Jama 1994;272:619–626.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein LB, Bertels C, Davis JN. Interrater reliability of the NIH stroke scale. Arch Neurol 1989;6:660–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke 1993;24:58–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Granger CV, Brownscheidle CM. Outcome measurement in medical rehabilitation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1995;11:262–268.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty M, Cummins R, Ferris L et al. Quality of life indexes for National Policy: Review and agende for research. Social Indicators Research 2001;55:1–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hantson L, de Weerdt W, de Keyser J et al. The European Stroke Scale. Stroke 1994;25:2215–2219.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heck G, Schönenberger JL. Early Functional Abilities (EFA) – eine Skala für die Evaluation von klinischem Zustandsbild und Verlauf bei Patienten mit schweren cerebralen Schädigungen. Neurol Rehabil 1996;Supplement:4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR. Gait assessment for neurologically impaired patients. Standards for outcome assessment. Phys Ther 1986;66:1530–1539.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huber W, Poeck K, Weniger D et al. Der Achener Aphasie-Test. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J et al. The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med 1981;15:221–229.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hutter BO, Wurtemberger G. Quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive lung diseases: psychometric criteria of the German version of the Sickness Impact Profile and initial results of its application]. Pneumologie 1997;51:108–114.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guidelines for stroke. London. Royal College of Physicians; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joos D, Chen Q, Jirjis J et al. An electronic medical record in primary care: impact on satisfaction, work efficiency and clinic processes. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006;394–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung T, Thom N. Grundlagen des Managements im Gesundheitswesen und Qualitätsmanagement. In: Zenger C, Jung T (Hrsg). Management im Gesundheitswesen und in der Gesundheitspolitik. Bern: Hans Huber; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiresuk TJ, Lund SH, Larsen NE. Measurement of goal attainment in clinical and health care programs. Drug Intell Clin Pharm 1982;16:145–153.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983;33:1444–1452.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lew HL, Lee E, Date ES et al. Influence of medical comorbidities and complications on FIM change and length of stay during inpatient rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002;81:830–837.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindeboom R, Vermeulen M, Holman R et al. Activities of daily living instruments:optimizing scales for neurologic assessments. Neurology 2003;60:738–742.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional Evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965;14:61–65.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masur H. Skalen und Scores in der Neurologie. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathew NT, Rivera VM, Meyer JS et al. Double-blind evaluation of glycerol therapy in acute cerebral infarction. Lancet 1972;2:1327–1329.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathias S, Nayak US, Isaacs B. Balance in elderly patients: the »get-up and go« test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986;67:387–389.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N et al. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 1985;39:386–391.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson KM, Pentland B, Cudmore SF et al. An inter-rater reliability study of the Functional Assessment Measure (FIM+FAM). Disabil Rehabil 1996;18:341–347.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975;1:277–299.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Msall ME, DiGaudio K, Rogers BT et al. The Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM). Conceptual basis and pilot use in children with developmental disabilities. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1994;33:421–430.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Overall JE, Gorham DR. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychol Rep 1962;10:799–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto AN, Melo TP, Lourenco ME et al. Can a clinical classification of stroke predict complications and treatments during hospitalization? Cerebrovasc Dis 1998;8:204–209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prosiegel M, Boettger S, Schenk T et al. Der Erweiterte Barthel-Index (EBI) – eine neue Skala zur Erfassung von Fähigkeitsstörungen bei neurologischen Patienten. Neurol Rehabil 1996;1:7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rentsch H. Grundlagen für die Erarbeitung von Qualitätsstandards in der Rehabilitation. Schweizerische Ärztezeitung 1995;76:2068–2071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossier P, Wade DT. Validity and reliability comparison of 4 mobility measures in patients presenting with neurologic impairment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:9–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rust KL, Smith RO. Assistive technology in the measurement of rehabilitation and health outcomes: a review and analysis of instruments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005;84:780–793.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sacket D, Richardson W, Rosenberg W et al. Evidence-based Medicine – How to practice & teach EBM. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaedler S, Kool J, Luethi H et al. Assessments in der Neurorehabilitation. Bern: Hans Huber Verlag; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönle P. Frühe Phasen der neurologischen Rehabilitation: Differentielle Schweregradbeurteilung bei Patienten in der Phase B (Frührehabilitation) und in der Phase C (Frühmobilisation/ Postprimäre Rehabilitation) mit Hilfe des Frühreha-Barthel-Index FRB. Neurol Rehabil 1996;1:21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrappe G. Zertifizierung nach DIN EN ISO 9000 ff. In: Lauterbach K, Schrappe M (Hrsg). Gesundheitsökonomie, Qualitätsmanagement und Evidence-based Medicine. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 2001. S. 425–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuntermann MF. Einführung in die ICF. Landsberg/Lech: ecomed Medizin; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddall PJ, Taylor DA, Cousins MJ. Classification of pain following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1997;35:69–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart G, Kidd D, Thompson AJ. The assessment of handicap: an evaluation of the Environmental Status Scale. Disabil Rehabil 1995;17:312–316.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stolov WC. Evaluation of the patient. In: Kottke L (Hrsg). Krusen›s Handbook of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stucki G, Cieza A, Ewert T et al. Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:281–282.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tarlov AR. Shattuck lecture-the increasing supply of physicians, the changing structure of the health-services system, and the future practice of medicine. J Miss State Med Assoc 1983;24:229–240.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974;2:81–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tesio L, Simone A, Bernardinello M. Rehabilitation and outcome measurement: where is Rasch analysis-going? Eura Medicophys 2007;43:417–426.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tinetti ME. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1986;34:119–126.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van der Lee JH, de Groot V, Beckerman H et al. The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:14–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll T, Wesiack W. Integrierte Medizin als Gesamtkonzept der Heilkunde: ein bio-psycho-soziales Modell. In: Adler R, Herrman J, Köhle K et al. (Hrsg). Psychosomatische Medizin – Modelle ärztlichen Denkens und Handelns. München: Urban & Fischer; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wild K, Janzik H. Neurologische Frührehabilitation. München: Zuckschwerdt Verlag; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade DT. Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publication; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster D. Critical analysis of the disability in Parkinson›s disease. Mod Treat 1968;5:257–282.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weed LJ. The problem oriented record as a basic tool in medical education, patient care and clinical research. Ann Clin Res 1971;3:323–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weed LL. Medical records that guide and teach. N Engl J Med 1968;278:652–657.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHOQOL-Group. The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health rganization. Soc Sci Med 1995;41:1403–1409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood-Dauphinee SL, Opzoomer MA, Williams JI et al. Assessment of global function: The Reintegration to Normal Living Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69:583–590.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. ICD-10 International Classification of Diseases. Geneva: WHO; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. ICF – International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. ICIDH – International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. Geneva: WHO; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright RE, Rao N, Smith RM et al. Risk factors for death and emergency transfer in acute and subacute inpatient rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1049–1055.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter REHAB Basel, 4025, Burgfelderhof 40, Basel

    MPH. Hansjörg Lüthi (Qualitätsbeauftragter)

  2. Neuro-/ Muskuloskelettales Leistungszentrum, 8639, Faltigberg

    Dr. med Javier Blanco (Chefarzt)

  3. REHAB Basel, 4025, Basel

    Dr. med. Mark Mäder (Chefarzt)

Authors
  1. MPH. Hansjörg Lüthi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. med Javier Blanco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dr. med. Mark Mäder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lüthi, H., Blanco, J., Mäder, M. (2010). Dokumentation, Messung und Qualitätsmanagement. In: NeuroRehabilitation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12915-5_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12915-5_43

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12914-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12915-5

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation