Skip to main content

Auswahl einer Handlung

  • Chapter
  • 5343 Accesses

Part of the Springer-Lehrbuch book series (SLB)

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12858-5_5
  • Chapter length: 18 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-642-12858-5
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Weiterführende Literatur

  • Bargh, J. A. & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1998). Descartes' Irrtum: Fühlen, Denken und das menschliche Gehirn.München: dtv.

    Google Scholar 

Literatur

  • Ach, N. (1910). Über den Willensakt und das Temperament. Leipzig: Quelle & Meyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (eds.), Unintended thought(pp. 3–51). London: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D. & Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275,1293–1295.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bekkering, H. & Neggers, S. F. W. (2002). Visual search is modulated by action intentions. Psychological Science, 13, 370– 374.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bertelson, P. (1961). Sequential redundancy and speed in a serial two-choice responding task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 90–102.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bertelson, P. (1963). S-R relationships and reaction times to new versus repeated signals in a serial task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 478–484.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bertelson, P. (1965). Serial choice reaction-time as a function of response versus signal-and-response repetition. Nature, 206, 217–218.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brebner, J. (1973): S-R compatibility and changes in RT with practice. Acta Psychologica, 37, 93–106.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1998). Descartes' Irrtum: Fühlen, Denken und das menschliche Gehirn.München: dtv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donders, F. C. (1868/1969). On the speed of mental processes (original work published 1868). Acta Psychologica, 30,412– 431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, D., Kreuzig, H. W., Reither, F. & Stäudel, T. (eds.). (1983). Lohhausen. Vom Umgang mit Unbestimmtheit und Komplexität. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exner, S. (1879). Physiologie der Grosshirnrinde. In L. Hermann (ed.), Handbuch der Physiologie, vol. 2(S. 189–350). Leipzig: Vogel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagioli, S., Hommel, B. & Schubotz, R. I. (2007). Intentional control of attention: Action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions. Psychological Research, 71, 22–29.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Falmagne, J. C., Cohen, S. P. & Dwivedi, A. (1975). Two-choice reactions as an ordered memory scanning process. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (eds.), Attention and performance, vol. V(pp. 296–344). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381–391.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4,11–26.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280– 290.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (1998a). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368–1384.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (1998b). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5,183–216.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (2000). The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance, vol. XVIII(pp. 247–273). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, R. (1953). Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45,188– 196.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 9, 188–205

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Keren, G. & Wagenaar, W. A. (1985) On the psychology of playing Blackjack: Normative and descriptive considerations with implications for decision theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 133–158.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, N. H. (1980). Sequential effects in choice reaction time. In A. T. Welford (ed.), Reaction times(pp 129–172). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornblum, S. (1973). Sequential effects in choice reaction time: A tutorial review. In S. Kornblum (ed.), Attention and performance, vol. IV(pp. 259–288). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T. & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253– 270.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, J. A. (1959). Tactual choice reaction times. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 76–83.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lhermitte, F. (1983). «Utilization behaviour” and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain, 106, 237–255.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. & Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1072–1090.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Longstreth, L. E., el-Zahhar, N. & Alcorn, M. B. (1985). Exceptions to Hick's law: Explorations with a response duration measure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114,417–434.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, J. (1885). Die Zeitlichen Verhältnisse der Wiellensthätigkeit. Philosophische Studien, 2, 73–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. E. & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowbray, G. H. & Rhoades, M. U. (1959). On the reduction of choice reaction times with practice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1,16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, P. & Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 133–162.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, J. (1980). What can be learned from human error reports? In K. D. Duncan, M. M. Gruenberg & D. Wallis (eds.), Changes in working life(pp. 97–113). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhinehart, L. (1971). Der Würfler.Berlin: Ullstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S. I. (1999). Types of thinking. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolls, E. T. (1999). The brain and emotion.Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (1998b). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5,183–216.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (2000). The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance, vol. XVIII(pp. 247–273). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, R. (1953). Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45,188– 196.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 9, 188–205.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Keren, G. & Wagenaar, W. A. (1985) On the psychology of playing Blackjack: Normative and descriptive considerations with implications for decision theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 133–158.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, N. H. (1980). Sequential effects in choice reaction time. In A. T. Welford (ed.), Reaction times(pp 129–172). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornblum, S. (1973). Sequential effects in choice reaction time: A tutorial review. In S. Kornblum (ed.), Attention and performance, vol. IV(pp. 259–288). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T. & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253– 270.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, J. A. (1959). Tactual choice reaction times. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 76–83.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lhermitte, F. (1983). «Utilization behaviour” and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain, 106, 237–255.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. & Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1072–1090.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Longstreth, L. E., el-Zahhar, N. & Alcorn, M. B. (1985). Exceptions to Hick's law: Explorations with a response duration measure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114,417–434.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, J. (1885). Die Zeitlichen Verhältnisse der Wiellensthätigkeit. Philosophische Studien, 2, 73–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. E. & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowbray, G. H. & Rhoades, M. U. (1959). On the reduction of choice reaction times with practice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1,16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, P. & Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 133–162.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, J. (1980). What can be learned from human error reports? In K. D. Duncan, M. M. Gruenberg & D. Wallis (eds.), Changes in working life(pp. 97–113). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhinehart, L. (1971). Der Würfler.Berlin: Ullstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S. I. (1999). Types of thinking. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolls, E. T. (1999). The brain and emotion.Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hommel, B., Nattkemper, D. (2011). Auswahl einer Handlung. In: Handlungspsychologie. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12858-5_5

Download citation