Skip to main content

Intention und Handlungsziel

  • Chapter
  • 5367 Accesses

Part of the Springer-Lehrbuch book series (SLB)

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12858-5_3
  • Chapter length: 25 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-642-12858-5
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Weiterführende Literatur

  • Baars, B. J. (1988). A cognitive theory of consciousness.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goschke, T. (2004). Vom freien Willen zur Selbstdetermination. Kognitive und volitionale Mechanismen der intentionalen Handlungssteuerung. Psychologische Rundschau, 55, 186–197.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (2007). Consciousness and control: Not identical twins. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14, 155–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. M. (2002). The illusion of conscious will.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Literatur

  • Ach, N. (1910). Über den Willensakt und das Temperament. Leipzig: Quelle & Meyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ach, N. (1935). Analyse des Willens. In E. Abderhalden (ed.), Handbuch der biologischen Arbeitsmethoden, vol. VI.Berlin: Urban & Schwarzenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altmann, E. M. & Gray, W. D. (2002). Forgetting to remember: The functional relationship of decay and interference. Psychological Science, 13,27–33.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R. C. & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence (ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory(pp. 89–195). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars, B. J. (1988). A cognitive theory of consciousness.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A. & Barndollar, K. (1996). Automaticity in action: The unconscious as repository of chronic goals and motives. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior(pp. 457–471). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97,523–547.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesen, C., Habekost, T. & Kyllingsbaek, S. (2005). A neural theory of visual attention. Bridging cognition and neurophysiology. Psychological Review, 112, 291–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. & Rovee-Collier, C. (1989). Contextual gating of memory retrieval. Developmental Psychobiology, 22, 533–552.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, W. B. (1852). On the influence of suggestion in modifying and directing muscular movement, independently of volition. Proceedings Royal Institution of Great Britain, 54 (1),147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chugani, H. T. (1994). Development of regional brain glucose metabolism in relation to behavior and plasticity. In G. Dawson & K. Fischer (eds.), Human behavior and the developing brain(pp. 153–175). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. D. & Huston, T. A. (1994). Progress in the use of interactive models for understanding attention and performance. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (eds.), Attention and performance, vol. XV(pp. 453–456). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Bettinardi, V., Tadary, B. et al. (1994). Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography. Nature, 371, 600–602.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, R. (2000) An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance, vol. XVIII(pp. 357–376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, R., Berendsen, E. & Cools, R. (1999). Goal neglect and inhibitory limitations: dissociable causes of interference effects in conflict situations. Acta Psychologica, 101, 379– 394.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, J. M. R. (1969). Physical control of the mind: Toward a psychocivilized society.New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A. (1990). Developmental time course in human infants and infant monkeys, and the neural bases of inhibitory control of reaching. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 608, 637–676.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A. & Gilbert, J. (1989). Development as progressive inhibitory control of action: Retrieval of a contiguous object. Cognitive Development, 4, 223–249.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J. (2001). An adaptive coding model of neural function in prefrontal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 820–829.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J., Emslie, H., Williams, P., Johnson, R. & Freer, C. (1996). Intelligence and the frontal lobe: The organization of goaldirected behavior. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 257–303.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, B. & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229–240.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, B., Hommel, B., Mentschel, C., Drzezga, A., Prinz, W. et al. (2002). Linking actions and their perceivable consequences in the human brain. Neuroimage, 17, 364–372.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, M. J. & Miyake, A. (2003). The role of inner speech in task switching: A dual-task investigation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 148–168.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G. & Rizzolatti, G. (1995). Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73,2608–2611.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci, M., Benuzzi, F., Bertolani, L., Daprati, E. & Gangitano, M. (2000). Language and motor control. Experimental Brain Research, 133, 468–490.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstadt, C. L., Hong, Y. J. & Diamond, A. (1994). The relationship between cognition and action: Performance of 3.5 to 7 year olds on Stroop-like day–night test. Cognition, 53, 129–153.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S. J. & Shallice, T. (2002). Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 297–337.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Goschke, T. (2000). Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance, vol. XVIII(pp. 331–355). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideomotor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73–99.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J., Schmitz, F., Schnitzler, I., Kessler, K., Shapiro, K. et al. (2004). Long-range neural synchrony predicts temporal limitations of visual attention in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 101, 13050–13055.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, P. (2005). Conscious intention and motor cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 290–295.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Harless, E. (1861). Der Apparat des Willens. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 38,50–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I. & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301–307.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, H. & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1987). Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational vs. volitional states of mind. Motivation and Emotion, 11,101–120.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243–249.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, W. R. & Smyth, G. E. (1948). Phantom limbs. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 11,88–112.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Herbart, J. F. (1825). Psychologie als Wissenschaft neu gegründet auf Erfahrung, Metaphysik und Mathematik. Zweiter, analytischer Teil.Königsberg: Unzer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgard, E. R. (1986). Divided consciousness: Multiple controls in human thought and action.New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (2009). Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research, 73, 512–526.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. & Elsner, B. (2009). Acquisition, representation, and control of action. In E. Morsella, J. A. Bargh & P. M. Gollwitzer (eds.), Oxford handbook of human action(pp. 371–398). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G. & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology.New York: Holt. Johnson, A. & Proctor, R. W. (2004). Attention: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalnins, I. & Bruner, J. (1973). The coordination of visual observation and instrumental behavior in early infancy. Perception, 2, 307–314.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J. & Engle, R. W. (2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 637–671.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kornhuber, H. H. & Deecke, L. (1965). Hirnpotentialänderungen bei Willkürbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschaftspotential und reafferente Potentiale. Pflügers Archiv, 284, 1–17.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Koutstaal, W. (1992). Skirting the Abyss: A history of experimental explorations of automatic writing in psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 28,5–27.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1922). Das Problem der Willensmessung und das Grundgesetz der Assoziation. Psychologische Forschung, 1, 191–302.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lhermitte, F. (1983). «Utilization behaviour” and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain, 106, 237–255.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Libet, B., Gleason, C. A., Wright, E. W. & Pearl, D. K. (1983). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). Brain, 106, 623–642.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. (1996). The CODE theory of visual attention: An integration of space-based and object-based attention. Psychological Review, 103,603–649.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393–434.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lotze, R. H. (1852). Medicinische Psychologie oder Physiologie der Seele.Leipzig: Weidmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1961). The development of the regulatory role of speech. In J. Tizard (ed.), The role of speech in the regulation of normal and abnormal behavior(pp. 50–96). New York: Liverlight.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mattison, H. (1855). Spirit-rapping unveiled!New York: Derby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meggle, G. (1993). Handlung, Kommunikation, Bedeutung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melcher, T., Weidema, M., Eenshuistra, R. M., Hommel, B. & Gruber, O. (2008). The neural substrate of the ideomotor principle: An event-related fMRI analysis. NeuroImage, 39, 1274–1288.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E. K. & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24,167–202.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, B. (1963). Effects of different brain lesions on card sorting: The role of frontal lobes. Archives of Neurology, 9, 90–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, H. N. & Mischel, W. (1983). The development of children's knowledge of self-control strategies. Child Development, 54, 603–619.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., Emerson, M. J., Padilla, F. & Ahn, J. (2004). Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: The effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cuing paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 115, 123–142.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Münsterberg, H. (1888). Die Willenshandlung. Ein Beitrag zur physiologischen Psychologie. Freiburg: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, T. I. (1963) Volition: A new experimental approach. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 4, 225–230.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation(pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosofsky R. M. & Palmeri, T. J. (1997). An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104(2), 266–300.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penfield, W. & Rasmussen, T. (1950). The cerebral cortex of man: A clinical study of localization and function. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret, E. (1974). The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behavior. Neuropsychologia, 12, 323–330.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, W. (1992). Why don't we perceive our brain states? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 1–20.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rochat, P. & Striano, T. (1999). Emerging selfexploration by 2-month-old infants. Developmental Science, 2,206–218.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rovee, C. K. & Rovee, D. T. (1969). Conjugate reinforcement of infants' exploratory behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 8, 33–39.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rovee-Collier, C. & Cuevas, K. (2009). Infant memory. In J. H. Byrne (ed.), Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference(pp. 687–714). Oxford: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovee-Collier, C., Sullivan, M. W., Enright, M. K., Lucas, D. & Fagen, J. W. (1980). Reactivation of infant memory. Science, 208,1159–1161.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E. & McClelland, J. L. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man.London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, A. & Stock, C. (2004). A short history of ideo-motor action. Psychological Research, 68,176–188.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Umiltà, C. (1988). The control operations of consciousness. In A. J. Marcel & E. Bisiach (eds.), Consciousness in contemporary science(pp. 334–356). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1934/1986). Thought and language.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. M. (2002). The illusion of conscious will.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yantis, S., Meyer, D. E. & Smith, J. E. K. (1991). Analyses of multinomial mixture distributions: New tests for stochastic models of cognition and action. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 350–374.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zelazo, P. D. (1999). Self-reflection and the development of consciously controlled processing. In P. Mitchell & K. J. Riggs (eds.), Children's reasoning and the mind.Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziehen, T. (1927). Sechs Vorträge zur Willenspsychologie. Jena: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hommel, B., Nattkemper, D. (2011). Intention und Handlungsziel. In: Handlungspsychologie. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12858-5_3

Download citation