Subjective Effectiveness in Agent-to-Human Negotiation: A Frame x Personality Account
This paper presents an empirical examination on the role of framing as a persuasion technique in agent-to-human negotiations. The primary hypothesis was that when a software agent frames the same offer in different ways it will have different consequences for a human counterpart’s perceptions of the negotiation process and outcomes. A secondary hypothesis was that the subjective effectiveness of different frames will be influenced by the personality of the human counterpart. An experiment to test these hypotheses was conducted using a simulated software seller agent and a human buyer counterpart in a 4-issue negotiation task. The results demonstrated the influence of framing on human counterparts’ judgments of subjective effectiveness–an influence that was moderated by the personality variable Need for Cognition. The findings illustrate the strategic impact of framing and personality on satisfaction in negotiation, suggesting that these variables should be taken into account in designing negotiating agents.
Keywordsframe negotiation satisfaction personality Need for Cognition persuasion agent-to-human negotiation automated negotiation experiment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.Yang, Y., Singhal, S.: Designing an Intelligent Agent that Negotiates Tactfully with Human Counterparts: A Conceptual Analysis and Modeling Framework. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conferences on System Sciences (HICSS42), pp. 1–10. IEEE Publication, Big Island (2009)Google Scholar
- 16.Bazerman, M.H., Neale, M.A.: Negotiating rationally. Free Press, New York (1992)Google Scholar
- 18.Schelling, T.C.: The Strategy of Conflict. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1960)Google Scholar
- 19.Tedeschi, J.T.: Threats and Promises. In: Swingle, P.G. (ed.) The Structure of Conflict, pp. 155–191. Academic Press, New York (1970)Google Scholar
- 20.Rubin, J.Z., Brown, B.R.: The Social Psychology of Bargaining and Negotiation. Academic Press, New York (1975)Google Scholar
- 28.Lim, J., Yang, Y.P.: Enhancing Negotiators’ Performance with Computer Support for Pre-Negotiation Preparation and Negotiation: An Experimental Investigation in an East Asian Context. Journal of Global Information Management 15, 18–42 (2007)Google Scholar
- 36.Haugtvedt, C.P., Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: Need for Cognition and Advertising: Understanding the Role of Personality Variables in Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Behavior 1, 239–260 (1992)Google Scholar
- 40.Yang, Y., Singhal, S., Xu, Y.: Offer with Choices and Accept with Delay: A Win-Win Strategy Model for Agent-Based Automated Negotiation. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference in Information Systems (ICIS 2009), Phoenix, Arizona, United States (2009)Google Scholar
- 41.Jones, B.H.: Analytical Mediation: An Empirical Examination of the Effects of Computer Support for Different Levels of Conflict in Two-Party Negotiation. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University Graduate School of Business, Bloomington, Indiana (1988)Google Scholar
- 42.Raiffa, H.: The Art and Science of Negotiations. Belknap/Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1982)Google Scholar
- 43.Fisher, R., Ury, W.: Getting to Yes. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1981)Google Scholar