Pitfalls in Preserving Geoinformation - Lessons from the Swiss National Park

  • Stephan ImfeldEmail author
  • Rudolf Haller
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)


In the Swiss National Park (SNP) long-term research is one of the main objectives. Scientific data has been collected for almost 100 years, many of them in a geographical context within this alpine environment. The digital era started in 1992 when a geographical information system (GIS) was established. Over the years a considerable amount of analogue and digital data has been accumulated which the SNP is obliged to keep available for future research generations. As one of the few undisturbed reference areas for global change with such long-term data series, the preservation of the source data is of high importance as the value of data increases as the time series are and will be continuously updated. When preserving long-term scientific data in digital forms one inevitably faces a manifold of problems not found in traditional (non-digital) archiving. We identified a set of obstacles and pitfalls which can have catastrophic effects on both archive creation and maintenance in a small scaled organisation like the SNP.

There are three main classes of threats to digital data and their archives: hardware, software, and brainware. The rapid developments in hardware and software are well known aspects making archiving of data and especially geodata a challenge by itself. One of the biggest threats to geodata is the so called brainware, i.e. users, data maintainers, system managers and on the long-term the heirs clearing the garret of their deceased ancestors, once brilliant researchers, unaware of their data collections’ value.

The SNP has encountered multiple pitfalls in its effort to preserve geodata. The development of the GIS software with its regular updates and enhancements resulted in several losses of data due to format incompatibilities despite of sticking with the largest GIS software vendor throughout the years. In comparison, traditional media selection in non-digital archives seems to be idyllic, as paper is the most stable and endurable storage known for centuries. The mere volume of data handled at our Geo-data center amounts to several terabytes, posing considerable problems in terms of backup and archiving and especially archive maintenance.

Metadata is an accepted key requirement without which data must be considered useless. Especially in long term data collections, metadata by itself does not sufficient. Current concepts for finding metadata focus on search engines with either unstructured or highly structured search strategies, unfortunately disregarding the fact that data must be embedded in knowledge retrieval systems spanning from traditional knowledge repositories (publications, libraries) with current digital content management systems and metainformation on data lineage. Such a meta-meta database system was developed for two research hotspots in nature reserves in Switzerland, currently containing roughly 3000 items.

Further research is urgently needed for digital geodata archiving to improve technical and administrative aspects as well as to build a strong awareness in scientific disciplines that not only archiving publications but source data as well is a key component when trying to better understand our changing world.


Geographical Information System Digital Data Digital Archive Geographical Information System Software Geographical Information System Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allgöwer, B & Bitter, P (1992), ,Konzeptstudie zum Aufbau eines geographischen Informationssystems für den Schweizerischen Nationalpark (GIS-SNP)’ (Jahresbericht GIS-SNP 1992), Wissenschaftliche Nationalparkkommission, Nationalparkdirektion.Google Scholar
  2. Allgöwer, B, Stähli, M, Bur, M, Koutsias, N, Koetz, B, Morsdorf, F, Finsinger, W, Tinner, W & Haller, R (2006), ‘Long-term fire history and high-resolution remote sensing based fuel assessment: Key elements for fire and landscape management in nature conservation areas’, Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 234, pp. 212-222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baer, J (1962), ‘Un demi-siècle d`activité scientifique dans le Parc national suisse’, Actes Soc Helv Sc Nat, pp. 50-62.Google Scholar
  4. Braun-Blanquet, J (1940), ‘Vingt années de botanique au Parc National Suisse.’, Act Soc Helvet Sc Nat, pp. 82-87.Google Scholar
  5. Bundesgesetz über den Schweizerischen Nationalpark im Kanton Graubünden 1980, Bern, viewed at 09 February 2009, <>.
  6. Burger, H (1950), ‘Forstliche Versuchsflächen im schweizerischen Nationalpark’, Mitt Schweiz Anst forstl Verswes, vol. 26, pp. 583-634.Google Scholar
  7. Camenisch, M (2002), ‘Veränderungen der Gipfelflora im Bereich des Schweizerischen Nationalparks ein Vergleich über die letzten 80 Jahre’, Jber. Natf. Ges. Graubünden, vol 111, pp. 27-37.Google Scholar
  8. Doucette, M & Paresi, C (2000), ‘Quality management in GDI’, in Geospatial data infrastructure, eds. Groot, R & Mclaughlin, J, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Filli, F & Suter, W (eds) 2006, Huftierforschung im Schweizerischen Nationalpark, Nat.park-Forsch. Schweiz, vol. 83 p. 241.Google Scholar
  10. Grabherr, G, Gottfried, M & Pauli, H (1994), ‘Climate effects on mountain plants’, Nature 369, 448.Google Scholar
  11. Grobe, H, Diepenbroek, M, Dittert, N, Reinke, M & Sieger, R (2006), ‘Archiving and Distributing Earth-Science Data with the PANGAEA Information System’ in Antarctica, eds. Fütterer, DK, Damaske, D, Kleinschmidt, G, Miller, H & Tessensohn F, pp. 403-406.Google Scholar
  12. Hoebelheinrich, N & Banning, J (2008), ‘An investigation into metadata for longlived geospatial data formats’, Technical report, Stanford University Libraries.Google Scholar
  13. Hodge, GM (2000), Best practices for digital archiving: An information life cycle approach, D-Lib magazine 6(1). Viewed at 09 February 2009, <>
  14. Hunter, GJ (1988), 'Non-current data and geographical information systems. A case for data retention', Int. J. Geographical Information Systems, vol. 2(3), pp. 281-286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morris, SP, Tuttle, J, Farrell, R (2006), ‘Preservation of State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data: The North Carolina Geospatial Data Archiving Project’, Proceeding of Archiving, pp. 45-48.Google Scholar
  16. National Library of Australia Preserving Access to Digital Information (PADI) initiative, viewed 09 February 2009, <>
  17. Risch AC, Schütz M, Krüsi B, Kienast F & Bugmann, H (2003), ‘Long-term empirical data as a basis for the analysis of successional pathways in subalpine conifer forests.’,Austrian Journal of Forest Science, vol. 120, pp. 59-64.Google Scholar
  18. Risch, A, Schütz, M, Krüsi, B, Kienast, F, Wildi, O & Bugmann, H (2004), ‘Detecting successional changes in long-term empirical data from subalpine conifer forests’, Plant Ecology, vol. 172(1), pp. 95-105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Saether, BE, Engen, S, Filli, F, Aanes, R, Schröder, W & Andersen, R (2002), ‘Stochastic population dynamics of an introduced Swiss population of the ibex’, Ecology vol. 12, pp. 3457-3465.Google Scholar
  20. Schütz, M, Krüsi, BO & Edwards, JP (eds) 2000, Succession research in the Swiss National Park from Braun-Blanquet's permanent plots to models of long-termecological change, Nat.park-Forsch. Schweiz, vol. 89, p. 259.Google Scholar
  21. Schröter, C (1920), ‘Der Werdegang des schweizerischen Nationalparks als Total- Reservation und die Organisation seiner wissenschaftlichen Forschung’, Denkschriften der Schweizerischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft(1).Google Scholar
  22. Schröter, C. (1923), ‘The Swiss National Park’, Nature, vol. 112(September 29), pp. 478-481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schweizerisches Bundesarchiv 2008, SIARD Formatbeschreibung, viewed 09 February 2009, <>
  24. Schweizerisches Bundesarchiv 2008, Elektronische Geschäftsverwaltung imBund, viewed 09 February 2009, <>
  25. Technical Committee ISO/TC 211 (2003) ISO 19115 (2003), Geographic information – Metadata, Bruxelles, ISO.Google Scholar
  26. Veregin, H (1999), ‘Data quality parameters’, in Geographical Information Systems, eds. Longley, PA, Goodchild, MF, Maguire, DJ & Rhind, DW, New York, John Wiley & Sons Inc., pp. 177-189Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Zürich and Swiss National ParkZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations