Skip to main content

Maintaining Cultural and Natural Biodiversity in the Carpathian Mountain Ecoregion: Need for an Integrated Landscape Approach

Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ENVSCIENCE)

Abstract

Landscapes located in the periphery of economic development, such as in parts of the Carpathian ecoregion, host remnants of both near-natural ecosystems and traditional agricultural land use systems. Such landscapes are important both for in situ conservation of natural and cultural biodiversity, and as references for biodiversity restoration elsewhere in Europe. This paper first reviews the contemporary understanding of benchmarks for biodiversity conservation in terms of ecosystems with natural disturbance regimes and pre-industrial cultural landscapes. Second, after providing a historical background, we review the challenges to natural and cultural biodiversity conservation and discuss current development trajectories. Third, we provide concrete examples from six Carpathian areas with different proportions of natural and cultural biodiversity. Fourth, we discuss the need for a diversity of management systems toward protection, management and restoration, spatial planning, and multi-sector governance for conservation of natural and cultural landscapes’ biodiversity. Finally, we stress the need to encourage integration of management, planning and governance of social and ecological systems to maintain natural and cultural biodiversity. The natural vegetation of the Carpathian Mountains is mostly forests and woodlands. Natural disturbances as wind, snow, frost, fire and flooding as well as insects and fungi resulted in forests characterized by old and large trees, diverse horizontal and vertical structures, and large amounts of dead wood in various stages of decay. While some near-natural forests remain, in most of the Carpathian ecoregion pre-industrial cultural landscapes evolved. Human use created traditional village system with infield houses, gardens, fields, meadows and outfield meadows and pastures, and woodlands which not only provide ecosystem services but also represent cultural heritage. The maintenance of natural and cultural biodiversity may require active management of species, habitats and processes. However, designing management systems that emulate natural and cultural landscape’s disturbance regimes is a major challenge requiring collaboration of private, public and civic sector stakeholders, and integration of social and ecological systems. Maintaining and restoring the traditional village system’s social capital as well as functional networks of protected areas and implementing sustainable forest management in managed forests are thus crucial. The Carpathian ecoregion forms a quasi-experiment with new country borders that have created stark contrasts among regions regarding natural and cultural biodiversity. This ecoregion can therefore be seen as a landscape-scale laboratory for systematic studies of interactions between ecological and social systems to support the development of an integrated landscape approach to biodiversity conservation and cultural heritage.

Keywords

  • Biodiversity Conservation
  • Dead Wood
  • Cultural Landscape
  • Carpathian Mountain
  • Landscape History

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12725-0_28
  • Chapter length: 32 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-642-12725-0
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Abrudan I, Turnock D (1999) A rural development strategy for the Apuseni Mountains, Romania. Geo J 46:319–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnoletti M (2000) Introduction: the development of forest history research. In: Agnoletti M, Anderson S (eds) Methods and approaches in forest history. CABI Publishing, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P (1997) Landscape analysis as a tool for the scientific management of biodiversity. Ecol Bull 46:140–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P (2003) Reconciling the linkages of land management with natural disturbance regimes to maintain forest biodiversity in Europe. In: Bissonette JA, Storch I (eds) Landscape ecology and resource management: linking theory with practice. Island Press, Covelo and Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P (2004) Habitat thresholds and effects of forest landscape change on the distribution and abundance of black grouse and capercaillie. Ecol Bull 5:173–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P (2006) Maintaining cultural and natural biodiversity in Europe’s economic centre and periphery. In: Agnoletti M (ed) The conservation of cultural landscapes. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P, Andersson L (2001) Estimates of the needs for forest reserves in Sweden. Scand J For Res Suppl 3:38–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P, Andersson K, Axelsson K, Elbakidze M, Jonsson BG, Roberge JM (2011) Protecting forest areas for biodiversity in Sweden 1991–2010: the policy implementation process and outcomes on the ground. Silva Fenn 45(5):1111–1133

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P, Boresjö-Bronge L, Mikusinski G, Sporrong U, Wästfelt A (2003a) Assessing village authenticity with satellite images—a method to identify intact cultural landscapes in Europe. Ambio 33(8):594–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P, Bütler R, Lazdinis M, Mikusinski G, Roberge JM (2003b) Habitat thresholds for focal species at multiple scales and forest biodiversity conservation—dead wood as an example. Ann Zool Fenn 40:473–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P, Dönz-Breuss M (2004) Measuring forest biodiversity at the stand scale—an evaluation of indicators in European forest history gradients. Ecol Bull 51:305–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P, Dönz-Breuss M, Roberge J-M (2004a) Targets and tools for the maintenance of forest biodiversity. Ecol Bull 51:1–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P, Edman T, Dönz-Breuss M, Wallis deVries M (2004b) Land management data and terrestrial vertebrates as indicators of forest biodiversity at the landscape scale. Ecol Bull 51:333–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P, Elbakidze M, Axelsson R, Törnblom J (2009) Sustainable forest management from policy to practice, and back again: landscapes as laboratories for knowledge production and learning in the Carpathian Mountains. In: Soloviy IP, Keeton WS (eds) Ecological economics and sustainable forest management: developing a trans-disciplinary approach for the Carpathian Mountains. Ukrainian National Forestry University Press, Lviv

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P, Kuuluvainen T (2004) Boreal forest disturbance regimes, successional dynamics and landscape structures—a European perspective. Ecol Bull 51:117–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P, Kopylova E, Korn H, Lazdinis M, Sayer JA, Teplyakov V, Törnblom J (2005) Changing forest values in Europe. In: Sayer JA, Maginnis S (eds) Forests in landscapes. Ecosystem approaches to sustainability. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P, Mikusiński G, Rönnbäck B et al (2003c) Two-dimensional gap analysis: a tool for efficient conservation planning and biodiversity policy implementation. Ambio 33:527–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P, Persson R, Schlaepfer R (2004c) The sustainable forest management vision and biodiversity—barriers and bridges for implementation in actual landscapes. Ecol Bull 51:29–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P, Roberge JM, Lõhmus A et al (2004d) Habitat modelling as a tool for landscape-scale conservation—a review of parameters for focal forest birds. Ecol Bull 51:427–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (2000) European landscape convention. European treaty series No. 176, Council of Europe

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (2004) New perspectives for EU rural development. The European Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (2007) Handbook on the Carpathian convention. The Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe, Szentendre

    Google Scholar 

  • Antrop M (1997) The concept of traditional landscapes as a base for landscape evaluation and planning. The example of the Flanders region. Landsc Urban Plan 38:105–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Antrop M (2005) Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landsc Urban Plan 70:21–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustyn M (2004) Anthropogenic changes in the environmental parameters of Bieszczady Mountains. Biosph Conserv 6:43–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustyn M (2006) Monografia rozwoju przemysłu drzewnego, jako podstawowego czynnika przekształceń środowiska leśnego Bieszczadów Zachodnich w XIX i pierwszej połowie XX wieku. PAN MiIZ, Ustrzyki Dolne

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustyn M, Kozak I (1997) The trends of anthropogenic pressure in Polish and Ukrainian Carpathians. In: Perzanowski K, Augustyn M (eds) Proceedings of 2nd annual meeting of ICE PAS, Bieszczady

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelsson R (2010) Integrative research and transdisciplinary knowledge production: a review of barriers and bridges. J Landsc Ecol 4(2):14–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelsson R, Angelstam P (2006) Biosphere reserve and model forest: a study of two concepts for integrated natural resource management. In: Proceedings from the 1st VHU conference on Science for sustainable development: starting points and critical reflections, Uppsala, VHU

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelsson R, Angelstam P, Elbakidze M (2008) Landscape approaches to sustainability. In: Frostell B et al (eds) Science for sustainable development—the social challenge with emphasis on the conditions for change. Uppsala, VHU

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelsson R, Angelstam P, Elbakidze M, Stryamets N, Johansson K-E (2011) Landscape approach for sustainable development and sustainability: a practical interpretation. J Landsc Ecol 4(3):5–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Babai D, Zs Molnár (2009) Népi növényzetismeret Gyimesben II.: termőhely- és élőhelyismeret. Bot Közl 96:145–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Bache I, Flinders M (eds) (2004) Multi-level governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker S (2006) Sustainable development. Routledge, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker S, Jehlicka P (eds) (1998) Dilemmas of transition. The environment, democracy and economic reform in east central Europe. Frank Cass, London and Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Baranyi B, G-Fekete E, Koncz G (2003) A roma-szegregáció kutatásának területi szempontjai a halmozottan hátrányos helyzetű encsi és a sellyei–siklósi kistérségekben. Kisebbs Kut 2:344–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudry J, Bunce RGH, Burel F (2000) Hedgerows: an international perspective on their origin, function and management. J Environ Manag 60:7–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Baur B, Cremene C, Groza G, Rakosy L, Schileyko A, Bau A, Stoll P, Erhardt A (2006) Effects of abandonment of subalpine hay meadows on plant and invertebrate diversity in Transylvania, Romania. Biol Conserv 132:261–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender O, Boehmer HJ, Jens D, Schumacher KP (2005) Using GIS to analyse long-term cultural landscape change in southern Germany. Landsc Urban Plan 70:111–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson J, Nilsson SG, Franc A, Menozzi P (2003) Biodiversity disturbances, ecosystem function and management of European forests. For Ecol Manag 132:39–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) (2003) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Besseau P, Dansou K, Johnson F (2002) The international model forest network (IMFN): elements of success. The For Chronic 78:648–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezák P, Halada L (2010) Sustainable management recommendations to reduce the loss of agricultural biodiversity in the Mountain Regions of NE Slovakia. Mt Res Dev 30:192–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Blicharska M, Angelstam P, Antonson H, Elbakidze M, Axelsson R (2011) Road, forestry and regional planners’ work for biodiversity conservation and public participation: a case study in Poland’s hotspots regions. J Environ Plan Manag 54(10):1373–1395

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodnariuc A, Bouchette A, Dedoubat JJ, Otto T, Fontugue M, Jalut G (2002) Holocene vegetational history of the Apuseni Mountains, central Romania. Quat Sci Rev 21:1465–1488

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohn U, Neuhäusl R (2000/2003) Karte der naturlichen Vegetation Europas. Maßstab 1:2,500,000. Teil 1: Erlauterungstext mit CD-ROM; Teil 2: Legende; Teil 3: Karten. Landwirtschaftsverlag, Munster

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrini-Feyerabend G, Pimbert M, Farvar MT, Kothari A, Renard Y (2004) Sharing power. Learning by doing in co-management of natural resources throughout the World. IIED and IUCN/CEESP/CMWG, Cenesta, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsa M, Chifelea C, Egerer H et al (2009) Visions and strategies. In: The Carpathian Area (VASICA). Protection and sustainable spatial development of the Carpathians in a transnational framework. The Carpathian project, Druckwerker, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutin S et al. (2002) The active adaptive management experimental team: a collaborative approach to sustainable forest management. In: Veeman TS et al. (eds) Advances in forest management: from knowledge to practice. Proceedings from the 2002 sustainable forest management network conference, University of Alberta, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  • Brang P (2005) Virgin forests as a knowledge source for central European silviculture: reality or myth? For Snow Landsc Res 79(1/2):19–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitenmoser U (1998) Large predators in the Alps: the fall and rise of Man’s competitors. Biol Conserv 83:279–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann K, Reif A (2006) Vegetation, landuse and landscape in the Apuseni Mountains, Romania. Bull Univ Agric Sci Vet Med 62:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch DE, Trexler JC (2003) The importance of monitoring in regional ecosystem initiatives. In: Busch DE, Trexler JC (eds) Monitoring ecosystems. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Buza M, Dimen L, Pop G, Turnock D (2001) Environmental protection in the Apuseni Mountains: the role of environmental non-governmental organisations (ENGOs). Geo J 54:631–653

    Google Scholar 

  • Buza M, Turnock D (2004) A research note: planning for the Carpathians. Geo J 60:135–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Bütler R, Angelstam P, Ekelund P, Schlaepfer R (2004) Dead wood threshold values for the three-toed woodpecker in boreal and sub-alpine forest. Biol Conserv 119:305–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpathian Convention (2003) Framework convention on the protection and sustainable development of the Carpathians. Kyiv

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark TW (2002) The policy process. A practical guide for natural resource professionals. Yale University Press, New Haven and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels SE, Walker GB (2001) Working through environmental conflict- the collaborative learning approach. Praeger, Westport and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Darby HC (1956) The clearing of woodlands in Europe. In: Thomas WL (ed) Man’s role in changing the face of the Earth. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Deodatus FD, Protsenko L (eds) (2010) Creation of ecological corridors in Ukraine. State agency for protected areas of the Ministry of environmental protection of Ukraine, Altenburg & Wymenga Ecological Consultants, Interecocentre, Kyiv

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogaru D, Zobrist J, Balteanu D, Popescu C, Sima M, Amini M, Yang H (2009) Community perception of water quality in a mining-affected area: a case study for the Certej catchment in the Apuseni Mountains in Romania. Environ Manag 43:1131–1145

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley N, Schlaepfer R, Jackson W, Jeanrenaud JP, Stolton S (2006) Forest quality. Assessing forests at a landscape scale. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyakonov KN, Kasimov NS, Khoroshev AV, Kushlin AV (2007) Landscape analysis for sustainable development: theory and application of landscape science in Russia. Alex Publishers, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Edman T, Angelstam P, Mikusiński G, Roberge J-M, Sikora A (2011) Spatial planning for biodiversity conservation: assessment of forest landscapes’ conservation value using umbrella species requirements in Poland. Landsc Urban Plan 102:16–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan D, Howell EA (2001) The historical ecology handbook. Island Press, Covelo

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbakidze M, Angelstam P (2007) Implementing sustainable forest management in Ukraine’s Carpathian Mountains: the role of traditional village systems. For Ecol Manag 249:28–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbakidze M, Angelstam P (2009) Cross-border cooperation along the eastern border of European union: a review and approach to learning for sustainable landscapes. Cent Eur J Spat Landsc Plan 20(1):33–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbakidze M, Angelstam P, Sandström C, Axelsson R (2010) Multi-stakeholder collaboration in Russian and Swedish model forest initiatives: adaptive governance towards sustainable forest management? Ecol Soc 15(2):14

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbakidze M, Angelstam P (2013) Sustainable forest management from policy to landscape, and back again: a case study in the Ukrainian Carpathian Mountains. In: Kozak J, Ostapowicz K, Bytnerowicz A, Wyżga B (eds) The Carpathians: Integrating Nature and Society Towards Sustainability, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • European Environmental Agency (2010) Europe’s ecological backbone: recognising the true value of our mountains. EEA report 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanta J (1997) Rehabilitating degraded forests in Central Europe into self–sustaining forest ecosystems. Ecol Eng 8:289–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearne A (1997) The history and development of the CAP 1945–1990. In: Ritson C, Harvey DR (eds) The common agricultural policy. CAB International, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Feurdean A (2010) Forest conservation in a changing world: natural or cultural? Example from the Western Carpathians forests, Romania. Stud Univ Babeş-Bolyai Geol 55(1):45–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Feurdean A, Willis KJ (2008) The usefulness of a longterm perspective in assessing current forest conservation management in the Apuseni Natural Park, (Romania). For Ecol Manag 256:421–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer P, Godzik B, Bicarova S, Bytnerowicz A (2005) Effects of air pollution and climate change on forests of the Tatra Mountains, Central Europe. In: Omasa K, Nouchi I, De Kok L (eds) Plant responses to air pollution and global change. Springer, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Fröhlich J (1954) Urwaldpraxis. Neumann Verlag, Radebeul and Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayer K (1886) Der gemischte Wald, seine Begründung und Pflege, insbesondere durch Horst und Gruppenwirtschaft. Verlag von Paul Parey, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Gąsienica-Byrcyn W (1992) The history and present role of the Tatra National Park. Mt Res Dev 12(9):205–210

    Google Scholar 

  • G-Fekete E (2007) Aprófalvaink átalakulóban. In: Zs Kocsis, T Csapó (eds) A kistelepülések helyzete és településföldrajza Magyarországon. Savaria University Press, Szombathely

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons M (1999) Science’s new social contract with society. Nature 402:11–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert B (2007) Collaborative synergy in resource and environmental management. Doctoral dissertation, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia

    Google Scholar 

  • Good DF (1994) The economic lag of Central and Eastern Europe: income estimates for the Habsburg successor states, 1870–1910. J Econ Hist 54:869–891

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabherr G, Koch G, Kirchmeir H, Reiter K (1998) Hemerobie österreichischer Waldökosysteme. Universitätsverlag Wagner, Innsbruck

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunst P (1989) Agrarian systems of Central and Eastern Europe. In: Chirot D (ed) The origins of backwardness in Eastern Europe: economics and politics from the middle ages until the early twentieth century. University of California Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurnell A, Surian N, Zanoni L (2009) Multi-thread river channels: a perspective on changing European alpine river systems. Aquat Sci 71:253–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutzwiller KJ (2002) Applying landscape ecology in biological conservation: principles, constraints and prospects. In: Gutzwiller KJ (ed) Applying landscape ecology in biological conservation. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • von Haaren C (2002) Landscape planning facing the challenge of the development of cultural landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 60:73–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Hais M, Jonasova M, Langhammer J, Kucera T (2009) Comparison of two types of forest disturbance using multitemporal Landsat TM/ETM plus imagery and field vegetation data. Remote Sens Environ 113:835–845

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensiruk S (1992) Lisy. Naukova dumka, Kyiv

    Google Scholar 

  • Heurich M (2009) Progress of forest regeneration after a large-scale Ips typographus outbreak in the subalpine Picea abies forests of the Bavarian Forest National Park. Silva Gabreta 15:49–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge I (2001) Beyond agri-environmental policy: towards an alternative model for rural environmental governance. Land Policy 18:99–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1995) What barriers? What bridges? In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS (eds) Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecoystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter ML (ed) (1999) Maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Imreh I (1993) A természeti környezet oltalmazása a székely rendtartásokban. In: Várkonyi R, Kósa L (eds) Európa híres kertje, Történeti ökológiai tanulmányok Magyarországról. Orpheusz, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes JL, Nitschke CR (2005) The application of forest zoning as an alternative to multiple-use forestry. In: Innes JL, Hoen HF, Hickey G (eds) Forestry and environmental change: Socioeconomic and political dimensions. Report No. 5 of the IUFRO task force on environmental change. CABI Publishing, Oxfordshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioja IC, Pătroescu M, Rozylowicz L, Popescu DV, Vergheleţ M, Zotta MI, Felciuc M (2010) The efficacy of Romania’s protected areas network in conserving biodiversity. Biol Conserv 143(11):2468–2476

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioras F (2003) Trends in Romanian biodiversity conservation policy. Biodivers Conserv 12:9–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Jędrzejewski W, Nowak S, Stachura K et al (2005) Project of ecological corridors linking Natura 2000 sites in Poland. Mammals Research Institute Polish Academy of Science, Białowieża

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonasova M, Prach K (2004) Central-European Mountain spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) forests: regeneration of tree species after a bark beetle outbreak. Ecol Eng 23:15–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonasova M, Prach K (2008) The influence of bark beetles outbreak vs. salvage logging on ground layer vegetation in Central European mountain spruce forests. Biol Conserv 141:1525–1535

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongman RHG (2002) Homogenisation and fragmentation of the European landscape: ecological consequences and solutions. Landsc Urban Plan 58:211–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson BG, Kruys N (eds) (2001) Ecology of woody debris in boreal forests. Ecol Bull 49

    Google Scholar 

  • Kann RA (1974) A history of the Habsburg Empire 1526–1918. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeton WS, Chernyavskyy M, Gratzer G, Main-Knorn M, Shpylchak M, Bihun Y (2010) Structural characteristics and aboveground biomass of old-growth spruce–fir stands in the eastern Carpathian Mountains, Ukraine. Plant Biosyst 144(1):148–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenderes K, Aszalós R, Ruff J, Barton Z, Standovár T (2007) Effects of topography and tree stand characteristics on susceptibility of forests to natural disturbances (ice and wind) in the Börzsöny Mountains (Hungary). Community Ecol 8(2):209–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenk G, Guehne S (2001) Management of transformation in central Europe. For Ecol Manag 151:107–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Konvicka M, Fric Z, Benes J (2006) Butterfly extinctions in European states: do socioeconomic conditions matter more than physical geography? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:82–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopecká M, Nováček J (2009) Forest fragmentation in the Tatra region in the period 2000–2006. Landf Anal 10:58–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubikova J (1991) Forest dieback in Czechoslovakia. Vegetatio 93:101–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuemmerle T, Hostert P, Radeloff VC, Perzanowski K, Kruhlov I (2007) Post-socialist forest disturbance in the Carpathian border region of Poland, Slovakia and Ukraine. Ecol Appl 17(5):1279–1295

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuemmerle T, Hostert P, Radeloff VC, van der Linden S, Perzanowski K, Kruhlov I (2008) Cross-border comparison of post-socialist farmland abandonment in the Carpathians. Ecosystem 11:614–628. doi:1007/s10021-008-9146-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuemmerle T, Chaskovskyy O, Knorn J, Radeloff VC, Kruhlov I, Keeton WS, Hostert P (2009a) Forest cover change and illegal logging in the Ukrainian Carpathians in the transition period from 1988 to 2007. Remote Sens Environ 113:1194–1207

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuemmerle T, Müller D, Griffiths P, Rusu M (2009b) Land use change in Southern Romania after the collapse of socialism. Reg Environ Change 9:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuemmerle T, Perzanowski K, Akcakaya HR, Beaudry F, Van Deelen TR, Parnikoza I, Khoyetskyy P, Waller DM, Radeloff VC (2011) Cost-effectiveness of strategies to establish a European bison metapopulation in the Carpathians. J Appl Ecol 48(2):317–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammerts van Buren EM, Blom EM (1997) Hierarchical framework for the formulation of sustainable forest management standards. Principles, criteria, indicators. Tropenbos Foundation, Backhuys Publishers, AH Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson A (2004) Landskapsplanering inom jordbrukspolitik. Agraria 442, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence A (2009) Forestry in transition: imperial legacy and negotiated expertise in Romania and Poland. Policy Econ 11(5–6):429–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee KN (1993) Compass and gyroscope. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Lickers HF, Story PA (1997) Partnership building for sustainable development: a first Nation’s perspective from Ontario. In: Bouman OT, Brand DG (eds) Sustainable forests: global challenges and local solutions. Food Products Press, Binghampton

    Google Scholar 

  • Liro A (1998) Strategia wdrażania Krajowej Sieci Ekologicznej—ECONET. Fundacja IUCN, Warszawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Maanen E van, Predoiu G, Klaver R, Soulé M, Popa M. Ionescu O, Jurj R, Neguş ş, Ionescu G, Altenburg W (2005) Safeguarding the Romanian Carpathian ecological network. A vision for large carnivores and biodiversity in Eastern Europe. A&W ecological consultants, Veenwouden, The Netherlands. ICAS Wildlife Unit, Brasov

    Google Scholar 

  • Magosci PR (2002) Historical atlas of Central Europe. University of Washington Press, Seattle Revised and expanded edition

    Google Scholar 

  • Main-Knorn M, Hostert P, Kozak J, Kuemmerle T (2009) How pollution legacies and land use histories shape post-communist forest cover trends in the Western Carpathians. For Ecol Manag 258(2):60–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcucci DJ (2000) Landscape history as planning tool. Landsc Urban Plan 49:67–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason WL (2003) Continuous cover forestry: developing close to nature forest management in conifer plantations in upland Britain. Scott For 57(3):141–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews JD (1989) Silvicultural systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer H (1984) Die Wälder Europas. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers J, Bass S (2004) Policy that works for forests and people. Real prospects for governance and livelihoods. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Merlo M, Croitoru L (2005) Concepts and methodology: a first attempt towards quantification. In: Merlo M, Croitoru L (eds) Valuing Mediterranean forests. Towards total economic value. CABI Publishing, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikusiński G, Angelstam P (1998) Economic geography, forest distribution and woodpecker diversity in central Europe. Conserv Biol 12:200–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikusiński G, Angelstam P (2004) Occurrence of mammals and birds with different ecological characteristics in relation to forest cover in Europe—do macroecological data make sense? Ecol Bull 51:265–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikusiński G, Angelstam P, Sporrong U (2003) Distribution of deciduous stands in villages located in coniferous forest landscapes in Sweden. Ambio 33:519–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Miya K (2000) Maramuresh. Humanitas, Bucarest

    Google Scholar 

  • Zs Molnár, Babai D (2009) Népi növényzetismeret Gyimesben I.:növénynevek, népi taxonómia, az egyéni és közösségi növényismeret. Bot Közl 96:117–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller J, Bussler H, Gossner M, Rettelbach T, Duelli P (2008) The European spruce bark beetle Ips typographus in a national park: from pest to keystone species. Biodivers Conserv 17:2979–3001

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller J, Bütler R (2010) A review of habitat thresholds for dead wood: a baseline for management recommendations in European forests. Eur J Res 129:981–992

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton BG (2005) Sustainability a philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. The University of Chicago press, Chicago and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF (1990) Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv Biol 4:355–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Opelz M (2004) Towards a Carpathian network of protected areas. Final report. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Oszlányi J, Grodzińska K, Badea O, Shparyk Y (2004) Nature conservation in Central and Eastern Europe with a special emphasis on the Carpathian Mountains. Environ Pollut 130:27–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Palang H, Printsmann A, Gyuro EK, Urbanc M, Skowronek E, Woloszyn W (2006) The forgotten rural landscapes of Central and Eastern Europe. Landsc Ecol 21:347–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrotta J, Agnoletti M, Johan E (eds) (2006) Cultural heritage and sustainable forest management: the role of traditional knowledge. MCPFE, Warsaw

    Google Scholar 

  • Patroescu M, Ioja IC, Patroescu-Klotz I, Necsuliu, R (2006) Umweltqualitat in Rumänien. In: Kahl T, Metzeltin M, Ungureanu R (eds) Rumänien. Raum und Bevölkerung. Geschichte und Geschichtsbilder. Kultur. Gesellschaft und Politik heute. Wirtschaft. Recht und Verfassung. Historische Regionen. LIT Verlag, Münster-Hamburg-Berlin-Wien-London-Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauleit S, Breuste J, Qureshi S, Sauerwein M (2010) Transformation of rural-urban cultural landscapes in Europe: Integrating approaches from ecological, socio-economic and planning perspectives. Landsc Online 20:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Perzanowski K, Olech W, Kozak I (2004) Constraints for re-establishing a meta-population of the European bison in Ukraine. Biol Conserv 120:345–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Perzanowski K, Wołoszyn-Gałęza A, Januszczak M (2008) Założenia do wyznaczenia ostoi żubra w Bieszczadach. Eur Bison Conserv Newsl 1:79–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterken G (1996) Natural woodland: ecology and conservation in northern temperate regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterken G (1999) Applying natural forestry concepts in an intensively managed landscape. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 8(5):321–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirot J-Y, Meynell PJ, Elder D (2000) Ecosystem management: lessons from around the world. A guide for development and conservation practitioners. IUCN, Gland and Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Powelson JP (1994) Centuries of economic endeavor, 4th edn. University of Michigan Press, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  • Primdahl J, Brandt J (1997) CAP, nature conservation and physical planning. In: Laurent C, Bowler I (eds) CAP and the regions: building a multidisciplinary framework for the analysis of the EU agricultural space. Institute National de la Recherche agronomique, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Puettmann KJ, Coates KD, Messier C (2009) A critique of silviculture. Island Press, Washington (Managing for complexity)

    Google Scholar 

  • Puumalainen J, Kennedy P, Folving S (2003) Monitoring of forest biodiversity: a European perspective with reference to temperate and boreal forest zone. J Environ Manag 67:5–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauschmayer F, Berghöfer A, Omann I, Zikos D (2009) Examining processe or/and outcomes? Evaluation concepts in European governance of natural resources. Environ Policy Gov 19:159–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Reif A, Rusdea E, Pacurar F, Rotar I, Brinkmann K, Auch E, Goia A, Bühler J (2008) A traditional cultural landscape in transformation the quest for sustainable development in the Apuseni Mountains, Romania. Mt Res Dev 28:18–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey V, Groza O, Ianos I, Patroescu M (2007) Atlas de la Roumanie. Reclus, Montpelier and Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberge JM, Angelstam P (2004) Usefulness of the umbrella species concept as a conservation tool. Conserv Biol 18(1):76–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberge J-M, Angelstam P (2009) Selecting species to be used as tools in the development of forest conservation targets. In: Villard M-A, Jonsson BG (eds) Setting conservation targets for managed forest landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozylowicz L, Popescu VD, Patroescu M, Chisamera G (2011) The potential of large carnivores as conservation surrogates in the Romanian Carpathians. Biodivers Conserv 20(3):561–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandström UG, Angelstam P, Khakee A (2006) Urban comprehensive planning—identifying barriers for the maintenance of functional habitat networks. Landsc Urban Plan 75:43–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauberer N, Zulka KP, Abensperg-Traun M et al (2004) Surrogate taxa for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes of eastern Austria. Biol Conserv 117(2):181–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer CO (1925) The morphology of landscape. Univ Calif Publ Geogr 2(2):19–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer JA, Campbell BM (2004) The science of sustainable development: local livelihoods and the global environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt T, Rákosy L (2007) Changes of traditional agrarian landscapes and their conservation implications: a case study of butterflies in Romania. Divers Distrib 13:855–862

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler A, Borlea F (1998) Lessons from natural forests as keys for sustainable management and improvement of naturalness in managed broadleaved forests. For Ecol Manag 109:293–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer B (2007) How useful is the landscape approach? In: Patry M, Ripley S (eds) World Heritage forests. Leveraging conservation and the landscape level. Proceedings of the 2nd World Heritage forests meeting, March 9-11, 2005, Nancy, France. UNESCO World Heritage Centre, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloviy IP, Keeton WS (eds) (2009) Ecological Economics and Sustainable Forest Management: Developing a trans-disciplinary approach for the Carpathian Mountains. Ukrainian National Forestry University Press, Lviv

    Google Scholar 

  • Soran V, Biro J, Moldovan O, Ardelean A (2000) Conservation of biodiversity in Romania. Biodivers Conserv 9:1187–1198

    Google Scholar 

  • Stancioiu PT, Abrudan IV, Dutca I (2010) The Natura 2000 ecological network and forests in Romania: implications on management and administration. Int Rev 12(1):106–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Surd V, Turnock D (2000) Romania’s Apuseni Mountains: Safeguarding a cultural heritage. GeoJ 50:285–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Svancara LK, Brannon R, Scott JM, Groves CR, Noss RF, Pressey RL (2005) Policy-driven versus evidence-based conservation: a review of political targets and biological needs. Biosci 55(11):989–995

    Google Scholar 

  • Svoboda M, Pouska V (2008) Structure of a Central-European mountain spruce old-growth forest with respect to historical development. For Ecol Manag 255:2177–2188

    Google Scholar 

  • Svoboda M, Fraver S, Janda P, Bače R, Zenáhliková J (2010) Natural development and regeneration of a Central European montane spruce forest. For Ecol Manag 260(5):707–714

    Google Scholar 

  • van Swaay CAM, Warren M (1999) Red data book of European butterflies (Rhopalocera). Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg (Nature and Environment 99)

    Google Scholar 

  • Szaro RC, Bytnerowicz A, Oszlányi J (2002) Effects of air pollution on forest health and biodiversity in forests of the Carpathian Mountains. NATO Sci Ser 1: Life Behav Sci 345

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor P, Fahrig L, Henein K, Merriam G (1993) Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68(3):571–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Tear TH, Kareiva P, Angermeier PL et al (2005) How much is enough? The recurrent problem of setting measurable objectives in conservation. Biosci 55(10):836–849

    Google Scholar 

  • von Thünen JH (1875) Der isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker GM, Heath MF (1994) Birds in Europe: their conservation status. BirdLife international, BirdLife conservation series 3, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL, Clark WC, Kates RW, Richards JF, Mathews JF, Meyer WB (1995) The earth as transformed by human action. Global and regional changes in the biosphere over the past 300 years. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnock D (2001) Railways and economic development in Romania before 1918. J Trans Geogr 9:137–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnock D (2002) Ecoregion-based conservation in the Carpathians and the land-use implications. Land Use Policy 19:47–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnock D (2007) Aspects of independent Romania’s economic history with particular reference to transition for EU accession. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Törnblom J, Angelstam P, Degerman E, Henrikson L, Edman T, Temnerud J (2011a) Catchment land cover as a proxy for macroinvertebrate assemblage structure in Carpathian Mountain streams. Hydrobiol Online. doi:10.1007/s10750-011-0769-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Törnblom J, Degerman E, Angelstam P (2011b) Forest proportion as indicator of ecological integrity in streams using Plecoptera as a proxy. Ecol Indic 11:1366–1374

    Google Scholar 

  • Törnblom J, Roberge J-M, Angelstam P (2011c) Rapid assessment of headwater stream macroinvertebrate diversity: an evaluation of surrogates across a land-use gradient. Fundam Appl Limnol 178:287–300

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2002) Biosphere reserves. Special places for people and nature. UNESCO workshops, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Villard MA, Jonsson BG (2009) Putting conservation target science to work. In: Villard MA, Jonsson BG (eds) Setting conservation targets for managed forest landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Vera FWM (2000) Grazing ecology and forest history. CABI Publishing, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos W, Meekes H (1999) Trends in European cultural landscape development: perspectives for a sustainable future. Landsc Urban Plan 46:3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Vucetich JA, Nelson MP (2010) Sustainability: virtuous or vulgar? Biosci 60(7):539–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Framework Directive (2000) 2000/60/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 23rd October 2000. Establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver PM, Jordan A (2008) What roles are there for sustainability assessment in the policy process? Int J Innov Sustain Dev 3(1/2):9–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster R, Holt S, Avis C (eds) (2001) The status of the Carpathians. WWF-The Carpathian ecoregion initiative report. WWF International, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte ID (1998) Rural Europe since 1500: areas of retardation and tradition. In: Butlin RA, Dodgshon RA (eds) An historical geography of Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • World Forestry Congress (2009) XIII World forestry congress, Buenos Aires, Argentina forest development: a vital balance, findings and strategic actions. http://foris.fao.org/meetings/download/_2009/xiii_th_world_forestry_congress/misc_documents/wfc_declaration.pdf. Accessed 2 Sep 2012

  • Young J, Richards C, Fischer A et al (2007) Conflicts between biodiversity conservation and human activities in the Central and Eastern European countries. Ambio 36(7):545–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Zechmeister HG, Tribsch A, Moser D, Peterseil J, Wrbka T (2003) Biodiversity ‘hot spots’ for bryophytes in landscapes dominated by agriculture in Austria. Agric Ecosyst Environ 94(2):159–167

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Per Angelstam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Angelstam, P. et al. (2013). Maintaining Cultural and Natural Biodiversity in the Carpathian Mountain Ecoregion: Need for an Integrated Landscape Approach. In: Kozak, J., Ostapowicz, K., Bytnerowicz, A., Wyżga, B. (eds) The Carpathians: Integrating Nature and Society Towards Sustainability. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12725-0_28

Download citation