Skip to main content

Legislative and Ethical Questions regarding DNA and Other Forensic "Biometric" Databases

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 6005))

Abstract

Forensic Science is gaining more importance in criminal justice, since the development of new sensitive and accurate scientific tools, and the construction of large computerized databases. Although very effective, these databases pose a lot of legislative and ethical concerns. In case of DNA concerns are deeper since it contains sensitive genetic information regarding its owner, not necessarily needed for his identification. This paper focuses on issues related to the collection, utilization and retention of DNA samples and profiles of legally innocent populations, illustrated by a case study where a voluntarily given DNA sample for a murder investigation successfully solved three non related rape cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Etzioni, A.: DNA Tests and Databases in Criminal Justice: Individual Rights and the Common Good. In: Lazer, D. (ed.) DNA and the Criminal Justice System: The Technology of Justice, pp. 197–223. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gill, P., Jeffries, A., Werrett, D.: Forensic Applications of DNA ’Fingerprints’. Nature 316, 76–79 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Whittall, H.: DNA profiling: Invaluable police tool or Infringement of Civil Liberties? Bioethics Forum (2007), http://www.thehastingscenter.org/Bioethicsforum/Post.aspx?id=648 (accessed at)

  4. Prainsack, B.: An Austrian Perspective. BioSocieties 3, 92–97 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rothstein, M., Tallbott, M. (The expanding Use of DNA in Law Enforcement: What Role for Privacy? J. of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34, 153–164 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zadok, E., Ben-Or, G., Fisman, G.: Forensic Utilization of Voluntarily Collected DNA Samples: Law Enforcement vs. Human Rights. In: Hindmarsh, R., Prainsack, B. (eds.) Genetic Suspects: Interrogating Forensic DNA Profiling and Databasing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (publication date spring 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harlan, L.: When Privacy Fails: Invoking a Property Paradigm to Mandate the Destruction of DNA Samples. Duke Law Journal 54, 179–219 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mepham, B.: Comments on the National DNA Database, NDNAD (2006), http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/fileLibrary/pdf/Professor_Ben_Mepham.pdf (accessed at)

  9. Williams, R., Johnson, P., Martin, P.: Genetic Information and Crime Investigation: Social, Ethical and Public Policy Aspects of the Establishment, Expansion and Police Use of the National DNA Database. Research funded by the Welcome Trust, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burton, C.: The UK NDNAD Intelligence Led DNA Screens: A Guide for Senior Investigating Officers. Presented at the 1st Interpol DNA Users Conference, Lyon (1999), http://www.interpol.int/Public/Forensic/dna/conference/DNADbBurton.ppt (accessed at)

  11. Walker, S., Harrington, M.: Police DNA ‘Sweeps’: A Proposed Model Policy on Police Request for DNA Samples. Police Professionalism Initiative, University of Nebraska, Omaha (2005), http://www.unomaha.edu/criminaljustice/PDF/dnamodelpolicyfinal.pdf (accessed at)

  12. Halbfinger, D.: Police Dragnets for DNA Tests Draw Criticism. The New-York Times, (January 4, 2003), accessed at: http://, http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/04/us/police-dragnets-for-dna-tests-draw-criticism.html (accessed at)

  13. Antoni Imiela- M25 Rapist Trapped by Crucial Forensic Evidence (2004), http://www.forensic.e-symposium.com (accessed at)

  14. Bieber, F.R.: Turning Base Hits into Earned Runs: Improving the Effectiveness of Forensic DNA Data Bank Programs. J. of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34, 222–233 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaye, D., Smith, M.: DNA Databases for Law Enforcement: The Coverage Question and the Case for a Population-Wide Database. In: Lazer, D. (ed.) DNA and the Criminal Justice System: The Technology of Justice, pp. 247–284. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nuffield Council on Bioethics: The Forensic use of Bioinformation: Ethical Issues. London (2007), http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/fileLibrary/pdf/The_forensic_use_of_bioinformation-ethical_issues.pdf (accessed at)

  17. Parry, B.: The Forensic Use of Bioinformation: A Review of Responses to the Nuffield Report. BioSocieties 3, 217–222 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dierickx, K.: A Belgian Perspective. BioSocieties 3, 97–99 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Walsh, S.: Legal Perceptions of Forensic DNA Profiling Part I: A Review of the Legal Literature. Forensic Science International 155, 51–60 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Simoncelli, T.: Dangerous Excursions: The Case against Expanding Forensic DNA Databases to Innocent Persons. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34(2), 390–397 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Privacy International. PHR2006- Privacy Topics- Genetic Privacy. London (2007), http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd%5B347%5D=x-347-559080 (accessed at)

  22. Bikker, J.: Response Submitted to the Consultation Held by the Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2007), http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/fileLibrary/pdf/Jan_Bikker (accessed at)

  23. Smith, M.: Let’s Make the DNA Identification Database as Inclusive as Possible. J. of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34, 385–389 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jones, G.: DNA Database ‘Should Include All’. The Telegraph, (October 24, 2006), http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1532210/DNA-database-should-include-all.html (accessed at)

  25. Nelkin, D., Andrews, L.: Surveillance Creep in the Genetic Age. In: Lyon, D. (ed.) Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk and Digital Discrimination, pp. 94–110. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Norton, A.: DNA Databases: The New Dragnet. The Scientist 19, 50–56 (2005)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Wadham, J.: Databasing the DNA of Innocent People- Why it offers Problems not Solutions. Liberty Organization press release, (September 13, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  28. European Court of Human Rights: Case of S. and Marper vs. the UK (2008), http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int////tkp197/viewhbkm.asp?action=open&table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649&key=74847&sessionId=skin=hudoc-en&attachment=true&16785556 (accessed at)

  29. Home Office: Keeping the Right People on the DNA Database: Science and Public Protection, London (2009), http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/cons-2009-dna-database/dna-consultation? (accessed at)

  30. Brettell, T., Butler, J., Almlrall, J.: Forensic Science. Analytical Chemistry 79, 4365–4384 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Szibor, R., Plate, I., Schmitter, H., Wittig, H., Krause, D.: Forensic Mass Screening using mtDNA. International Journal of Legal Medicine 120, 372–376 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Camp, N., Dierickx, K.: The Expansion of Forensic DNA Databases and Police Sampling Powers in the Post 9/11-Era: Ethical Considerations on Genetic Privacy. Ethical Perspectives 14(3), 237–268 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Prainsack, B., Gurwitz, D.: Private Fears in Public Places? Ethical and Regulatory Concerns Regarding Human Genomic Databases. Personalized Medicine 4, 447–452 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Asplen, C.: The Non-forensic Use of Biological Samples taken for Forensic Purposes: An International Perspective. American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics (2006), http://www.aslme.org/dna_04/spec_reports/asplen_non_forensic.pdf (accessed at)

  35. Williams, R., Johnson, P.: Inclusiveness, Effectiveness and Intrusiveness: Issues in the Developing Uses of DNA Profiling in Support of Criminal Investigations. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34, 234–247 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. McCartney, C.: Forensic DNA Sampling and the England and Wales National DNA Database: A Skeptical Approach. Critical Criminology 12, 157–178 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ansell, R., Rasmusson, B.: A Swedish Perspective. BioSocieties 3, 88–92 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Farhi vs. State of Israel: Serious Crime File 1084/06, Tel-Aviv District Court, (April 26, 2007) (in Hebrew)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yissacharov vs. Chief Military Prosecutor: CrimA 5121/98 (1998), http://elyon1.court.gov.il/files_eng/98/210/051/n21/98051210.n21.pdf (accessed at)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zadok, E.(. (2010). Legislative and Ethical Questions regarding DNA and Other Forensic "Biometric" Databases. In: Kumar, A., Zhang, D. (eds) Ethics and Policy of Biometrics. ICEB 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6005. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12595-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12595-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12594-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12595-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics