FDI Spillovers in the Czech Republic: Takeovers Versus Greenfields

  • Juraj Stančík


This contribution analyzes the effects of foreign direct investment on the sales growth rate of domestic companies in the Czech Republic. Using firm-level panel data from 1995 to 2005, it studies both horizontal and vertical spillovers with respect to two kinds of foreign investment – takeovers and greenfields. This is the first paper applying this framework on firm level. The study allows also for the lagged nature of these spillovers. The results suggest that the sales growth rates of domestic companies mostly decrease in the presence of foreign companies, especially in upstream sectors. The impact through horizontal spillovers is mixed – positive from foreign takeovers, negative from greenfields. Positive forward spillovers are present mainly in recent years. Time sensitivity is revealed for horizontal as well as vertical spillovers.


Foreign Direct Investment Productivity Growth Total Factor Productivity Foreign Investor Spillover Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



I would like to thank Štěpán Jurajda and Peter Katuščák for valuable consultations on this research, and Jan Hanousek and Evžen Kočenda for providing data and useful comments. Financial support from GAČR grant No. 402/06/1293 is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. Aitken, B. J., & Harrison, A. E. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, 89(3), 605–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aminian, N., Campart, S., & Pfister, E. (2005). Macroeconomic determinants of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: European and Asian evidence. Paper for conference.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, J., & Javorcik, B. S. (2005). Gifted kids or pushy parents? Foreign acquisitions and plant performance in Indonesia. Policy Research Working Paper Series, 3597. The World Bank.Google Scholar
  4. Bena, J., & Hanousek, J. (2006). Rent extraction by large shareholders: Evidence using dividend policy in the Czech Republic. CERGE-EI Working Paper, 291.Google Scholar
  5. Damijan, J. P., Knell, M., Majcen, B., & Rojec, M. (2003a). The role of FDI, R&D accumulation and trade in transferring technology to transition countries: Evidence from firm panel data for eight transition countries. Economic Systems, 27(2), 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Damijan, J. P., Knell, M., Majcen, B., & Rojec, M. (2003b). Technology transfer through FDI in top-10 transition countries: How important are direct effects, horizontal and vertical spillovers? WDI Working Paper, No. 549.Google Scholar
  7. Djankov, S., & Hoekman, B. (2000). Foreign investment and productivity growth in Czech enterprises. The World Bank Economic Review, 14(1), 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Earnhart, D., & Lízal, L. (2002). Effects of ownership and financial status on corporate environmental performance. CEPR Discussion Paper, 3557.Google Scholar
  9. Evenett, S., & Voicu, A. (2003). Picking winners or creating them? Revising the benefits of FDI in the Czech Republic. Oxford University Working Paper.Google Scholar
  10. Haddad, M., & Harrison, A. (1993). Are there positive spillovers from direct foreign investment? Evidence from panel data for Morocco. Journal of Development Economics, 42, 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanousek, J., Kočenda, E., & Švejnar, J. (2007). Origin and concentration: Corporate ownership, control and performance. Economics of Transition, 15(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harzing, A.-W. (2002). Acquisitions vs. greenfield investments: International strategy and management of entry modes. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hennart, J.-F., & Park, Y.-R. (1993). Greenfield vs. acquisition: The strategy of Japanese investors in the United States. Management Science, 39(9), 1054–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jarolím, M. (2001). Foreign direct investment and productivity of Czech manufacturing firms. CERGE-EI Dissertation.Google Scholar
  15. Javorcik, B. S. (2004). Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. American Economic Review, 94(3), 605–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kinoshita, Y. (2000). R&D and technology spillovers via FDI: Innovation and absorptive capacity. WDI Working Paper, 349.Google Scholar
  17. Kosová, R. (2006). Do foreign firms crowd out domestic firms? Evidence from the Czech Republic. Working Paper, 6, School of Business and Public Management, George Washington University.Google Scholar
  18. Kosová, R., & Ayyagari, M. (2006). Does FDI facilitate domestic entrepreneurship? Evidence from the Czech Republic. School of Business, GWU Working Paper, 8.Google Scholar
  19. Stančík, J. (2007). Horizontal and vertical FDI spillovers: Recent evidence from the Czech Republic. CERGE-EI Working Paper, 340.Google Scholar
  20. Wang, M., & Wong., M. C. S. (2007). What drives economic growth? The case of cross-border M&A and greenfield FDI activities. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  21. Zejan, M. C. (1990). New ventures or acquisitions. The choice of Swedish multinational enterprises. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 38(3), 349–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Economic Research and Graduate EducationCharles UniversityPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations