Skip to main content

Tectonic Significance and Age of Doleritic Sill Near Bandhalimal in the Singhora Protobasin of Chhattisgarh Basin, Central India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dyke Swarms:Keys for Geodynamic Interpretation

Abstract

Dolerites traversing Raipur Group of Chhattisgarh Basin have been reported by various workers but their radiometric age is not determined for ascertaining the absolute age of Raipur Group. Recent works on magmatic zircon and monazite from tuffs of Raipur and Singhora Groups have added significant radiometric and authentic data to accept the age of Chhattisgarh Supergroup. Present study reports Rb/Sr whole rock age from dolerite intruded into basal Rehatikhol Formation, of Singhora Group. It is exposed over a length of ~2 km with thickness of 2.0 m near Bandhalimal (21°22'20":83°15'15") village of Chhattisgarh State. Dolerite shows chilled margin and concordant relationship with overlying and underlying shales, and induration effects on the shale of contact zones. The sill has several cavities and vugs filled with altered material. Mineralogical, textural and chemical characters with ophitic to subophitic texture and varying degree of alterations confirm doleritic composition of the sill. The lower Mg number (5.6–35.3) of these rocks suggests the evolved nature of magma and extensive crustal contamination. Major and trace elemental concentration indicate continental tholeiite, which is further supported by various other chemical diagrams such as alkaline index {A.I.= Na2O + K2O/(SiO2–43) × 0.17} against Al2O3, SiO2 vs. FeOt/MgO, and total alkali vs. silica diagram. In the TiO2-K2O-P2O5 trilinear diagram most of the samples plot in the continental field. Thus continental environment is suggested for the intrusion of dolerite. Rb-Sr whole rock estimation carried out at Geochronology Laboratory AMD, Hyderabad, on 8 representative rock samples of dolerite, provide 1,100 Ma reference line with initial ratio = 0.7095 ± 0.002. The 87Rb/86Sr and 87Sr/86Sr ratio vary from 0.11 to 0.29 and 0.71166 to 0.71583 respectively. In addition to above galena along with pyrite have also been observed in the fracture zones of Rehatikhol Formation near west of Juba and are located ~2.5 km south of Bandhalimal. The orientation of these fracture zones is sub-parallel to the sill. On this assumption hydrothermal activity in the fracture zone is considered coeval with the intrusion of sill and studied for any age relationship. Pb isotopic ratios (206Pb/204Pb = 19–20, 207Pb/204Pb = 16.4–16.7 and 208Pb/204Pb = 38.2–38.8) studied for eight galena samples indicate model ages varying from 660 to 1,100 Ma with “μ2” (238U/204Pb) values of 13.2 to 13.6 for second stage, based on two stage Pb growth model. This observation confirms the existence of igneous/hydrothermal activity in the basin and is consistent with the Rb/Sr age of sill as mentioned above. Therefore it is concluded that the rocks of Rehatikhol formation are older than 1,100 Ma considering two different sample population and methodology. A concomitant thermal event in the basin at ~1,100 Ma with related hydrothermal activity is thus proved by this communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Banerjee DM, Majumdar A (1999) On the late Neoproterozoic–early Cambrian transition events in parts of east Gondwanaland. Gondwana Res 2: 199–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu A, Patranabis-Deb S, Schieber J, Dhang PC (2008) Stratigraphic position of the ~1,000 Ma Sukhda Tuff (Chhattisgarh supergroup, India) and the 500 Ma question. Precamb Res 167: 383–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickford ME, Basu A, Patranabis-Deb S, Dhang P (2009) Depositional history of the mesoProterozoic Chhattisgarh Basin, Central India: Constraints from new shrimp zircon ages. Geol Soc of America Abs with Programs 41: 541

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborti S (1997) Elucidation of the sedimentary history of the Singhora group of rocks, Chhattisgarh supergroup, Madhya Pradesh. Geol Surv Ind Rec 130: 184–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty PP, Sarkar A, Das K, Das P (2009) Alluvial fan to storm-dominated shelf transition in the Mesoproterozoic Singhora group, Chattisgarh supergroup, Central India. Precamb Res 170: 88–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary AK, Naik A, Mukhopadhyay D, Gopalan K (1996) Rb-Sr dating of Sambalpur Granodiorite, Western Orissa. J Geol Soc Ind 47: 503–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Condie KC (1997) Plate tectonic and crustal evolution. Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY: 288

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox KG, Bell JD, Pankhrst RJ (1979) The interpretation of igneous rocks. Allen and Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Das N, Dutta DR, Das DP (2001) Proterozoic cover sediments of southeastern Chhattisgarh state and adjoiming part of orissa. Geol Surv India Spec Publ 55: 237–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Das DP, Kundu A, Das N, Dutta DR, Kumaran K, Ramamurthy S, Thangavelu C, Rajaya V (1992) Lithostratigraphy and sedimentation of Chhattisgarh Basin. Indian Mineral 46: 271–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Das K, Yokoyama K, Chakraborty PP, Sarkar A (2009) Basal tuffs and contemporaneity of the Chattisgarh and Khariar Basins based on new dates and geochemistry. Jour Geol 117: 88–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK, Sinha DK, Verma SC, Singh R (1998) Ore mineragraphy of uraniferous polymetallic sulphides at Juba, Chhattisgarh Basin, Raipur district, Central India. Expl Res Atom Min 11: 25–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale VS (1991) Constraints on the evolution of Purana Basins of Peninsular India. Jour Geol Soc India 38: 231–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruzer H, Harse W, Kursten M, Schnitzer WA, Murthy KS, Srivastava NK (1977) K/Ar dates of two glauconites from the Chandarpur series (Chhattisgarh/India): On the Stratigraphic status of the Late Precambrian basins in Central India. Geol Jb B 28: 23–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Middlemost EAK (1975) The basalt clan. Earth Planet Sci Lett 11: 337–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyashiro A (1974) Volcanic rock series in Island area and active continental margin. American Jour Sci 274: 321–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moitra AK (1990) Chronologic implications of the stromatolites, microbiota and trace fossils of the Chattisgarh basin, Madhya Pradesh: Workshop on Precambrian of central India. Geol Surv India Spec Publ 28: 384–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee A, Ray RK (2008) SHRIMP ages of Zircon in the uppermost Tuff in Chattisgarh Basin in Central India Require ~500-Ma adjustment in Indian Proterozoic Stratigraphy: A discussion. Jour Geol 116: 537–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee A, Ray RK (2010) An Alternate View on the Stratigraphic Position of the ~1-Ga Sukhda Tuff vis-à-vis Chronostratigraphy of the Precambrians of the Central Indian Craton. Jour Geol 118: 325–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murti KS (1987) Stratigraphy and sedimentation in Chattisgarh Basin. In Purana Basins of Peninsular India, Geol Soc India Mem 6: 239–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Murti KS (1996) Geology, sedimentation and economic mineral potential of the southcentral part of Chhattisgarh Basin. Geol Surv India Mem 125: 139

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey BK, Chabria T, Gupta JN (1995) Geochronological characterstic of the Proterozoic terrains of Peninsular India: Relevance to the first order target selection for uranium exploration. Expl Res Atom Min 8: 182–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Patranabis-Deb S, Bickford ME, Hill B, Chaudhuri AK, Basu A (2007) SHRIMP ages of zircon in the uppermost tuff in Chattisgarh basin in central India require ~500-Ma adjustment in Indian Proterozoic stratigraphy. Jour Geol 115: 407–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patranabis-Deb S, Bickford ME, Hill B, Chaudhuri AK, Basu A (2008) SHRIMP ages of zircon in the uppermost Tuff in Chattisgarh Basin in central India require ~500 Ma adjustment in Indian Proterozoic stratigraphy: A reply. Jour Geol 116: 540–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce TH, Gorman BE, Birkett TC (1975) The TiO2–K2O–P2O5 diagram: A method of discriminating between oceanic and non-oceanic basalts. Earth Plan Sci Let 24: 419–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha DK (1996) Chrono-stratigraphy of the Khairagarh Basin, Central India: A reappraisal. Gond Geol Mag 11: 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha DK (1997) Porcellanite from the Singhora Group – An example of valcaniclastic sedimentation in the Chhattisgarh Supergroup Central India. In abstract volume of XIV Conv Ind Ass Sediment Madras: 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha DK (2007) A new find of younger dolerite dykes with continental flood basalt affinity from the Meso-Neoproterozoic Chhattisgarh Basin, Bastar Craton, Central India. Comments Jour Geol Soc India 70: 371–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha DK, Hansoti SK (1995) U and polymetallic sulphides bearing Juba member of Singhora Protobasin of Chhatisgarh supergroup, Raipur district, Madhya Pradesh. A new horizon. Jour Atom Min Sci 3: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha DK, Jain SK (2008) uraniferous rhyolitic vein in the basement fractures of Singhora protobasin near Juba village, Raipur district, Chhattisgarh. Expl Res Atom Min 18: 119–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha DK, Jain SK, Choudhury DK, Veera Bhasker D (2002) Conophyton from Rehatikhol Formation, Chhattisgarh Basin, Central India. In: Guhey R, Thakur P, Sridhar Rao R, (eds) Proceedings volume on Recent Researches on the Proterozoic Basins of India, Pub by Govt Sci College Raipur: 27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha DK, Raju KA, Veera Bhaskar D, Asha K (2001) Sulphur Isotopic Characteristics of pyrite and galena from the Singhora Group, Chhattisgarh supergroup, India: Genetic implications. Jour Geol Soc India 57: 171–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha DK, Tiwary A, Verma SC, Singh R (1998) Geology, sedimentary environment and geochemistry of uraniferous arenite of Singhora group, Chhattisgarh Basin, Raipur district, Central India. In: Tiwari RN, (ed) Proc Nat Symp Recent Res Sed Basin, Hindustan Pub Co Dehra-Dun: 150–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey JS, Kramers JD (1975) Approximation of terrestrial lead isotope evolution by a two- stage model. Earth Planet Sci Lett 26: 207–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subba Rao DV, Khan MWY, Sridhar DN, Naga Raju K (2007) A new find of younger dolerite dykes with continental flood basalt affinity from the Meso-Neoproterozoic Chhattisgarh Basin, Bastar Craton, Central India. Jour Geol Soc India 69: 80–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi C, Murti KS (1981) Search for source rock of alluvial diamonds in the Mahanadi valley. Symp. on Vindhyans of Central India, Geol Surv India Misc Publ 50: 205–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma RK, Samadder AK, Murti K (1977) Palaeomagnetic study of Gunderdehi shale of Raipur Group from Chhattisgarh basin in India. Indian Jour Earth Sci 4: 183–191

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to the Anjan Chaki Director, AMD, Hyderabad for granting the permission to publish this research paper in the Dyke Conference. Discussions held with P. S. Parihar Additional Director, AMD, Hyderabad and analytical support from scientists of XRF Lab, AMD, Nagpur, and Geochronology Lab AMD, Hyderabad, have provided significant inputs for this communication. Authors are thankful to all of them. The paper was reviewed by M. E. Bickford, Department of Earth Sciences, Syracuse University Syracuse, New York, USA, whose suggestions made authors to incorporate lead systematics from this area and enhance the scope of paper for meaningful interpretations. Authors are grateful to him for his constructive review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D.K. Sinha .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sinha, D., Jain, S., Naganath, K.P. (2011). Tectonic Significance and Age of Doleritic Sill Near Bandhalimal in the Singhora Protobasin of Chhattisgarh Basin, Central India. In: Dyke Swarms:Keys for Geodynamic Interpretation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12496-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics