Visual Analytics of Urban Environments using High-Resolution Geographic Data

Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC, volume 0)


High-resolution urban data at house level are essential for understanding the relationship between objects of the urban built environment (e.g. streets, housing types, public resources and open spaces). However, it is rather difficult to analyze such data due to the huge amount of urban objects, their multidimensional character and the complex spatial relation between them. In this paper we propose a methodology for assessing the spatial relation between geo-referenced urban environmental variables, in order to identify typical or significant spatial configurations as well as to characterize their geographical distribution. Configuration in this sense refers to the unique combination of different urban environmental variables. We structure the analytic process by defining spatial configurations, multidimensional clustering of the individual configurations, and identifying emerging patterns of interesting configurations. This process is based on the tight combination of interactive visualization methods with automatic analysis techniques. We demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed methods and methodology in an application example on the relation between street network topology and distribution of land uses in a city.


Street Network Urban Environment Spatial Configuration Betweenness Centrality Closeness Centrality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anselin, L. (1995) Local Indicators of Spatial Association – LISA, Geographical Analysis 27(2), 93–115.Google Scholar
  2. Bacao, F., Lobo, V., Painho, M. (2005). The Self-Organizing Map, the Geo-SOM, and Relevant Variants for Geo-Sciences. Computers & Geosciences, 31, 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benenson, I., & Omer, I. (2003). High-Resolution Census Data: A Simple Way to Make Them Useful. Data Science Journal 2 (26), 117-127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cox, M. & Cox, M. (2001). Multidimensional Scaling. Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Deboeck, G., Kohonen, T. (1998). Visual Explorations in Finance With Self-Organizing Maps. Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Elmqvist, N., Dragicevic, P., Fekete, J.-D (2008). Rolling the Dice: Multidimensional Visual Exploration Using ScatterPlot Matrix Navigation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 14, 1141–1148.Google Scholar
  7. Everitt, B. S. & Nicholls, P. (1975). Visual Techniques for Representing Multivariate Data. The Statistician, 24(1), 37-49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fua, Y.-H., Ward, M., Rundensteiner, E. (1999). Hierarchical Parallel Coordinates for Exploration of Large Datasets. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Visualization (VIS), 43-50.Google Scholar
  9. Guo, D., Chen, J., MacEachren, A. M., Liao, K (2006). A Visualization System for Space-Time and Multivariate Patterns (VIS-STAMP). IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12(6):1461–1474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hillier, B., Penn A., Hanson J., Grajewski T. and Xu J. (1993) Natural Movement: Configuration and Attraction in Urban Pedestrian Movement, Environment and Planning B, 20, pp. 29-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Honkela, T., Kaski, S., Lagus, K., Kohonen, T. (1997). WEBSOM— Selforganizing Maps of Document Collections. Proceedings Workshop on Self-Organizing Maps, 310–315.Google Scholar
  12. Inselberg, A. & Dimsdale, B. (1990). Parallel Coordinates: A Tool for Visualizing Multi-Dimensional Geometry. Proceedings Conference on Visualization, 361–378.Google Scholar
  13. Jiang, B. (2007). A Topological Pattern of Urban Street Networks: Universality and Peculiarity. Physica A, 384, 647-655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jiang, B. & Harrie L. (2004) Selection of Streets from a Network Using Self-Organizing Maps, Transactions in GIS, 8(3): 335–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jolliffe, I. (2002). Principal Components Analysis. Springer, 3rd edition.Google Scholar
  16. Kohonen, T. (2001). Self-Organizing Maps. Springer, 3rd edition.Google Scholar
  17. Kohonen, T., Hynninen, J., Kangas, J., Laaksonen, J. (1996). SomPak: The Self-Organizing Map Program Package. Helsinki University of Technology Technical Report.Google Scholar
  18. LeBlanc, J., Ward, M.O., Wittels, N (1990). Exploring N-dimensional Databases. Proceedings Conference on Visualization, 230 - 237.Google Scholar
  19. Omer, I., & Benenson I., (2002). Investigating Fine-Scale Residential Segregation by Means of Local Spatial Statistics. Geography Research Forum 22, 41-60.Google Scholar
  20. Porta, P. Crucitti, P. & Latora V. (2006). The network analysis of urban streets: A primal approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2006, 33, 705–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ratti C, Pulselli RM, Williams S, Frenchman D (2006) Mobile Landscapes: using location data from cell phones for urban analysis. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 33: 727-748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Spielman, S. & Thill, J.-C. (2008). Social Area Analysis, Data Mining, and GIS. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 32, 110–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Talen, E. (2003). Neighborhoods as Service Providers: a Methodology for Evaluating Pedestrian Access. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, 181- 200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Talen, E., & Anselin, L. (1998). Assessing spatial equity: an evaluation of measures of accessibility to public playgrounds. Environment and Planning A, 30, 595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Van Long, T. & Linsen, L. (2009). MultiClusterTree: Interactive Visual Exploration of Hierarchical Clusters in Multidimensional Multivariate Data. Proceedings of Eurographics / IEEE Symposium on Visualization.Google Scholar
  26. Vesanto, J. (1999). SOM-based Data Visualization Methods. Intelligent Data Analysis, 3(2):111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ware, C. (2004). Information Visualization: Perception for Design. Morgan Kaufmann, 2nd Ed.Google Scholar
  28. Wilkinson, L., Anand, A., Grossman, R. (2005). Graph-Theoretic Scagnostics. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization.Google Scholar
  29. Wong D.W.S, (2003) Spatial Decomposition of Segregation Indices: A framework toward measuring segregation at multiple levels, Geographical Analysis, 35 (3), 179-184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Visual Analytics Group, Dept. of Computer and Information ScienceUniversity of KonstanzKonstanzGermany
  2. 2.Urban Space Analysis Laboratory, Dept. of Geography and Human EnvironmentTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  3. 3.Interactive Graphics Systems GroupTechnische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations