Towards a Spatial Semantics to Analyze the Visual Dynamics of the Pedestrian Mobility in the Urban Fabric
The aim of this paper is to evaluate the impact of visual ambiences (visualscape) onto an urban pedestrian pathway. This work takes place within the interdisciplinary research project called Ambioflux, dealing with the sustainable mobility issues in the city. We add to the spatial semantic layer GDMS (Generic Datasource Management System) an innovative method based on partial isovists fields in order to compute the visibility of the pedestrian all along his pathway. This method allows “concatenating” several partial visibility polygons in order to represents the visual perception of the pedestrian.
After a brief overview of the visibility analysis context, we justify the need of a specific semantic tool to develop the type of dynamics visual analysis we focus on. The remainder of this paper is dedicated to the methodology of the mobile pedestrian pathway’s visual fingerprint characterization using the spatial formalism already described. At last, we present a use case based on a real city tour so as to identify the best rotation’s direction from the visual perception point of view.
KeywordsSpatial Data Infrastructure Aperture Angle Urban Fabric Optic Array Weighted Coverage
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The AMBIOFLUX project was funded by CNRS and the French MEEDM Ministry under PIRVE’s (Programme Interdisciplinaire de Recherche Ville et Environnement) contract #1004. Part of the GearScape developments is funded by the AMBIOFLUX project.
Special thank to Fernando GONZÁLEZ CORTÉS (Spain) for all the developments performed on the GearScape platform.
- Anguix, A. and Carrion, G. (2005). gvSIG: Open Source Solutions in spatial technologies. In GIS Planet, Estoril, Portugal.Google Scholar
- Batty M and Jiang B (1999). Multi-agent simulation : new approaches to exploring space-time dynamics in GIS. CASA Working Papers Series, London, UK, (10):25.Google Scholar
- Benedikt ML and Burnham CA (1985). Perceiving architectural space: From optic arrays to isovists. In Persistence and Change, pages 103–114. edited by WH Warren and RE Shaw. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Couclelis H (1992). People Manipulate Objects (but Cultivate Fields): Beyond the Raster-Vector Debate in GIS. In Frank AU, Campari I, and Formentini U, editors, Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space, International Conference GIS - From Space to Territory: Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 65–77, Pisa, Italy. Springer.Google Scholar
- Gibson JJ (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Hillier B and Hanson J (1984). The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University press.Google Scholar
- Leduc, T., Bocher, E., González Cortés, F., and Moreau, G. (2009a). GDMS-R: A mixed SQL to manage raster and vector data. In GIS Ostrava 2009 - Symposium on Seamless Geoinformation Technologies, Ostrava, Czech Republic. Leduc T, Woloszyn P, and Joanne P (2009b). GDMS: A spatial semantics to evaluate soundmarks effects on an urban pedestrian pathway. In 12th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science — AGILE’2009, Hanover, Germany.Google Scholar
- Lynch KA (1976). Managing the sense of a region. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Meilinger T, Franz G, and Bülthoff HH (2009). From isovists via mental representations to behaviour: first steps toward closing the causal chain. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
- Piombini A (2006). Modélisation des choix d’itinéraires pédestres en milieu urbain approche géographique et paysagère. PhD thesis, Université de Franche-Comté. Ecole Doctorale “langages, espaces, temps, sociétés”.Google Scholar
- Tandy CRV (1967). The isovist method of landscape survey. Methods of Landscape Analysis. Ed. H C Murray, Landscape Research Group, PO Box 53, Horspath, Oxford, OX33 1WX.Google Scholar
- Woloszyn, P. and Follut, D. (2000). The visualization of the urban "ambients" parameters. In 14th International symposium "Computer Science for environmental protection" of Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI), pages 173-186, Bonn, Germany. METROPOLIS Verlag.Google Scholar
- Woloszyn, P. (2002). From fractal techniques to subjective quantification: towards an urban ambient metric? In Landscape and Architectural Modeling Symposium, pages 1-6, Sousse, Tunisia.Google Scholar