Skip to main content

Evolving Artistic Styles through Visual Dialogues

  • Conference paper
  • 1574 Accesses

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNTCS,volume 6025)

Abstract

We describe an interactive art that can facilitate visual dialogues with a user and reveal the user’s compositional proclivity. The system invites the user for a visual dialogue, initially presenting two compositions in distinct styles. Then, the user “converses” with the system by responding. As the interactions continue, the user starts to experience a tendency evolving in the compositions–much the same way as in a dialogue between two people. Throughout the interactions, the evolutionary process brings out a certain sense of self-reflection to the user. The product of the dialogue is an experience in self-reflection in visual proclivity. I3 was exhibited to the public in two international art forums.

Keywords

  • Parse Tree
  • Perceptual Grouping
  • Artistic Style
  • Small Shape
  • Gestalt Theory

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12242-2_27
  • Chapter length: 10 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-642-12242-2
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Birkhoff, G.D.: Aesthetic Measure. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1933)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Boden, M.A., Edmonds, E.A.: What is generative art? Digital Creativity 20(1-2), 21–46 (2009)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Collomosse, J.P.: Supervised genetic search for parameter selection in painterly rendering. In: Rothlauf, F., et al. (eds.) EvoWorkshops 2006. LNCS, vol. 3907, pp. 599–610. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Collomosse, J.P., Hall, P.M.: Genetic paint: A search for salient paintings. In: Rothlauf, F., Branke, J., Cagnoni, S., Corne, D.W., Drechsler, R., Jin, Y., Machado, P., Marchiori, E., Romero, J., Smith, G.D., Squillero, G. (eds.) EvoWorkshops 2005. LNCS, vol. 3449, pp. 437–447. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gary, G.: On the origin of the term “computational aesthetics”. In: Neumann, L., Sbert, M., Gooch, B., Purgathofer, W. (eds.) Computational Aesthetics 2005, Eurographics Workshop on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization, and Imaging, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, May 2005, pp. 9–12. Eurographics Association (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hoenig, F.: Defining computational aesthetics. In: Neumann, L., Sbert, M., Gooch, B., Purgathofer, W. (eds.) Computational Aesthetics 2005, Eurographics Workshop on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization, and Imaging, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, May 2005, pp. 13–18. Eurographics Association (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hofstadter, D.R.: Metamagical themas: Can inspiration be mechanized? Scientific American, 18–34 (September 1985)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Holland, J.H.: Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Machado, P., Cardoso, A.: Computing aesthetics. In: de Oliveira, F.M. (ed.) SBIA 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1515, pp. 219–228. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. McCormack, J.: Open problems in evolutionary music and art. In: Rothlauf, F., Branke, J., Cagnoni, S., Corne, D.W., Drechsler, R., Jin, Y., Machado, P., Marchiori, E., Romero, J., Smith, G.D., Squillero, G. (eds.) EvoWorkshops 2005. LNCS, vol. 3449, pp. 428–436. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sims, K.: Artificial evolution for computer graphics. In: SIGGRAPH 1991: Proceedings of the 18th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pp. 319–328. ACM, New York (1991)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Thorisson, K.R.: Simulated perceptual grouping: An application to computer interaction. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 876–881 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Todd, S.C., Latham, W.: Evolutionary Art and Computers. Academic Press, London (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Jowett, B. (Translator): Plato: Meno. Digireads.com, Stilwell, KS (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wertheimer, M., King, D.: Max Wertheimer and Gestalt Theory. Transaction Publishers, Piscataway (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Oh, J.C., Zajec, E. (2010). Evolving Artistic Styles through Visual Dialogues. In: , et al. Applications of Evolutionary Computation. EvoApplications 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6025. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12242-2_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12242-2_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12241-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12242-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)