Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications

ICCSA 2010: Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2010 pp 528–544Cite as

Geospatial Semantics: A Critical Review

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6016))

Abstract

Current approaches to semantics in the geospatial domain are mainly based on ontologies, but ontologies, since continue to build entirely on the symbolic methodology, suffers from the classical problems, e.g. the symbol grounding problem, affecting representational theories. We claim for an enactive approach to semantics, where meaning is considered to be an emergent feature arising context-dependently in action. Since representational theories are unable to deal with context and emergence, a new formalism is required toward a contextual theory of concepts. SCOP is considered a promising formalism in this sense and is briefly described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hakimpour, F., Geppert, A.: Resolving Semantic Heterogeneity in Schema Integration: an Ontology Based Approach. In: FOIS 2001, pp. 297–308 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bishr, Y.: Overcoming the semantic and other barriers in GIS interoperability. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 12(4), 299–314 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Harvey, F., Kuhn, W., Pundt, H., Bishr, Y., Riedmann, C.: Semantic Interoperability: a central issue for sharing geographic information. The Annals of Regional Science 33, 213–232 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuhn, W.: Geospatial Semantics: Why, of What, and How? In: Spaccapietra, S., Zimányi, E. (eds.) Journal on Data Semantics III. LNCS, vol. 3534, pp. 1–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gärdenfors, P.: Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson, M.L.: Embodied Cognition: a field guide. Artificial Intelligence 149, 91–130 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Froese, T.: On the Role of AI in the Ongoing Paradigm Shift within the Cognitive Sciences. In: Lungarella, M., Iida, F., Bongard, J.C., Pfeifer, R. (eds.) 50 Years of Aritficial Intelligence. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4850, pp. 63–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Steels, L.: Fifty Years of AI: From Symbols to Embodiment - and Back. In: Lungarella, M., Iida, F., Bongard, J.C., Pfeifer, R. (eds.) 50 Years of Aritficial Intelligence. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4850, pp. 18–28. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Dreyfus, H.L., Why Heideggerian, A.I.: Why Heideggerian AI failed and how fixing it would require making it more Heideggerian. Artificial Intelligence 171(18), 1137–1160 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gärdenfors, P.: Cognitive Science: from computers to anthills as models of human thought (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Licata, I.: La logica aperta della mente. Codice Edizioni (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lakoff, G.: Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson, P.W.: More Is Different. Science 177(4047), 393–396 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dennet, D.C.: Cognitive Wheels: The Frame Problem of Artificial Intelligence. In: Hookaway, C. (ed.) Minds, Machines and Evolution, Cambridge University (reprinted in Pylyshyn 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  15. McCarthy, J., Hayes, P.: Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In: Meltzer, B., Michie, D. (eds.) Machine Intelligence, vol. 4

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harnad, S.: The Symbol Grounding Problem. Physica D 42, 335–346 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Harnad, S.: Computation Is Just Interpretable Symbol Manipulation: Cognition Isn’t. Minds and Machines 4, 379–390 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Searle, J.R.: Minds, Brains, and Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3(3), 417–457 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosch, E.: Principles of categorization. In: Rosch, E., Lloyd, B.B. (eds.) Cognition and categorization. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  20. Heidegger, M.: Essere e Tempo. Longanesi (2005), Italian translation of Sein und Zeit (1927)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gibson, J.J.: The theory of affordances. In: Shaw, R., Bransford, J. (eds.) Perceiving, Acting and Knowing, pp. 127–143. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hampe, B.: Image Schemas in cognitive linguistics: Introduction. In: Dirven, R., Langacker, R., Taylor, J. (eds.) From perception to meaning: image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistic Research, vol. 29, pp. 1–12 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fauconnier, G., Turner, M.: Conceptual Projection and Middle Spaces. Report 9401 Department of Cognitive Science, University of San Diego (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gärdenfors, P., Warglien, M.: Cooperation, Conceptual Spaces and the Evolution of Semantics. In: Vogt, P., Sugita, Y., Tuci, E., Nehaniv, C.L. (eds.) EELC 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4211, pp. 16–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Steels, L.: Semiotic dynamics for embodied agents. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21(3), 32–38 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Loula, A., Gudwin, R., El-Hani, N.C., Queiroz, J.: The emergence of symbol-based communication in a complex system of artificial creatures. In: Proceedings KIMAS 2005: Modeling, Evolution and Engineering, pp. 279–284 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Puglisi, A., Baronchelli, A., Loreto, V.: Cultural route to the emergence of linguistic categories. PNAS 105(23), 7936–7940 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Di Paolo, E.A.: Organismically-inspired robotics: homeostatic adaptation and teleology beyond the closed sensorimotor loop. In: Murase, K., Asakura, T. (eds.) Dynamical Systems Approach to Embodiment and Sociality, pp. 19–42 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Di Paolo, E., Rohde, M., De Jaegher, H.: Horizons for the enactive mind: Values, social interaction and play. In: Stewart, J., Gapenne, O., Di Paolo, E. (eds.) Enaction: Towards a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science. MIT Press, MA

    Google Scholar 

  30. De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E.: Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6(4), 485–507 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Maturana, H.R., Varela, F.J.: Autopoiesi e cognizione. La realizzazione del vivente. Marsilio (2001), Italian transalation of Autopoiesis and Cognition (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Barsalou, L.W., Niedenthal, P.M., Barbey, A., Ruppert, J.: Social embodiment. In: Ross, B. (ed.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 43, pp. 43–92 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Varela, F.J., Thompson, E., Rosch, E.: The Embodied Mind: cognitive science and human experience. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Uschold, M.: Where Are the Semantics in the Semantic Web? AI Magazine 24(3), 25–36 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sheth, A.P., Ramakrishnan, C., Thomas, C.: Semantics for the Semantic Web: The implicit, the Formal and the Powerful. International Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems 1(1), 1–18 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Guarino, N.: Formal Ontology in Information Systems. In: Guarino, N. (ed.) Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Proceedings of FOIS 1998, pp. 3–15 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Agarwal, P.: Ontological considerations in GIScience. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 19, 501–536 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Guarino, N.: Formal Ontology, Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation. International Journal of Human and Computer Studies 43(5/6), 625–640 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wache, H., Vogele, T., Visser, U., Stuckenschmidt, H., Schuster, G., Neumann, H., Huber, S.: Ontology-based Integration of Information – A survey of existing approaches. In: Proceedings of IJCAI, pp. 108–117 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Goldstone, R.L., Son, J.Y.: Similarity. In: Holyoak, K.J., Morrison, R.G. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, pp. 13–36. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Visser, P.R.S., Jones, D.M., Bench-capon, T.J.M., Shave, M.J.R.: An Analysis of Ontology Mismatches; Heterogeneity versus Interoperability. In: AAAI 1997 Spring Symposium on Ontological Engineering (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Krötzsch, M., Hitzler, P., Ehrig, M., Sure, Y.: Category Theory in Ontology Research: Concrete Gain from an Abstract Approach. Technical Report, AIFB, University of Karlsruhe (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gärdenfors, P.: How to make the Semantic Web more semantic. In: Vieu, A.C., Varzi, L. (eds.) Formal Ontology in Information Systems, pp. 19–36. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Flender, C., Kitto, K., Bruza, P.: Beyond Ontology in Information Systems. QUT Technical report, FIT-TR-2008-05 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Dourish, P.: What We Talk About When We Talk About Context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 8(1), 19–30 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ouksel, A.M.: In-context peer-to-peer information filtering on the web. SIGMOD Records 32(3), 65–70 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Aberer, K., Cudré́-Mauroux, P., Ouksel, A.M., et al.: Emergent Semantics Principles and Issues. In: Lee, Y., Li, J., Whang, K.-Y., Lee, D. (eds.) DASFAA 2004. LNCS, vol. 2973, pp. 25–38. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Cattuto, C., Loreto, V., Pietronero, L.: Semiotic dynamics and Collaborative Tagging. PNAS 104(5), 1461–1464 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Schuurman, N.: Formalization matters: critical GIScience and ontology research. The Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96(4), 726–739 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Schuurman, N.: Reconciling Social Constructivism and Realism in GIS. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 1(1), 75–90 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Mark, D.M., Egenhofer, M., Hirtle, S., Smith, B.: UCGIS Emerging Research Theme: Ontological Foundations for Geographic Information Science (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Mark, D.M., Turk, A.: Landscape categories in Yindjibarndi: Ontology, environment, and language. In: Kuhn, W., Worboys, M.F., Timpf, S. (eds.) COSIT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2825, pp. 28–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Frank, A.U.: Tiers on ontology and consistency constraints in geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15(7), 667–678 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Gomes, J., Velho, L.: Abstraction Paradigms for Computer Graphics. The Visual Computer 11(5), 227–239 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Camara, G., Monteiro, A.M.V., Paiva, J.A., Gomes, J., Velho, L.: Towards a unified framework for geographical data models. In: Figueiredo, L. (ed.) Proceedings of Geolnfo 2000 Workshop Brasileiro de Geoinformatica, pp. 37–44 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Fonseca, F.T., Egenhofer, M.J.: Semantic granularity in ontology-driven geographic information systems. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence – Special issue on Spatial and Temporal granularity 36(1/2), 121–151 (2002)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  57. Kuhn, W.: Semantic Reference System. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 17, 405–409 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Klien, E., Einspanier, U., Lutz, M., Hubner, S.: An architecture for ontology-based discovery and retrieval of georgaphic information. In: Proceedings of AGILE 2004, pp. 179–188 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Fonseca, F.T., Egenhofer, M.J., Agouris, P., Camara, G.: Using ontologies for integrated geographic information systems. Transactions in GIS 6, 231–257 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Camara, G., Monteiro, A.M.V., Paiva, J.A., Souza, R.C.M.: Action-Driven Ontologies of the Geographic Space: Beyond the Field-Object Debate. In: GIScience 2000: The First International Conference on Geographic Information Science (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Mark, D.M.: Cognitive Image-Schemata for Geographic Information: relations to user views and GIS interfaces. In: Proceedings of GIS/LIS 1989, vol. 2, pp. 551–560 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Rodriguez, A., Egenhofer, M.J.: Image-Schemata-Based Spatial Inferences: The Container-Surface Algebra. In: Frank, A.U. (ed.) COSIT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1329, pp. 35–52. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  63. Frank, A.U., Raubal, M.: Formal specification of image schemata – a step towards interoperability in geographic information systems. Spatial Cognition and Computation 1, 67–101 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Raubal, M., Egenhofer, M.: Comparing the complexity of wayfinding tasks in built environments. Environment & Planning B 25(6), 895–913 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Choi, S., McDonough, L., Bowerman, M., Mandler, J.: Early sensitivity to language-specific spatial terms in English and Korean. Cognitive Development 14, 241–268 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Correa-Beningfield, M., Kristiansen, G., Navarro-Fernando, I., Candeloise, C.: Image schemas vs “Complex Promitives” in cross-cultural spatial cognition. In: Dirven, R., Langacker, R., Taylor, J. (eds.) From perception to meaning: image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistic Research, vol. 29, pp. 343–366 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Zlatev, J.: Spatial Semantics. In: Cuyckens, H., Geeraerts, D. (eds.) Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ch. 2

    Google Scholar 

  68. Rodriguez, A., Egenhofer, M.J., Rugg, R.: Assessing Semantic Similarity amont geospatial entity class definitions. In: Včkovski, A., Brassel, K.E., Schek, H.-J. (eds.) INTEROP 1999. LNCS, vol. 1580, pp. 189–202. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  69. Keßler, C., Raubal, M., Janowicz, K.: The Effect of Context on Semantic Similarity Measurement. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM-WS 2007, Part II. LNCS, vol. 4806, pp. 1274–1284. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  70. Aerts, D., Gabora, L.: A theory of concepts and their combination I; The structure of the sets of contexts and properties. Kybernetes 34(1), 167–191 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  71. Aerts, D., Gabora, L.: A theory of concepts and their combination II; A Hilbert space representation. Kybernetes 34(1), 192–221 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  72. Gabora, L., Aerts, D.: Contextualizing concepts using a mathematical generalization of the quantum formalism. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 14(4), 327–358

    Google Scholar 

  73. Gabora, L., Rosch, E., Aerts, D.: Toward an Ecological Theory of Concepts. Ecological Psychology 20(1), 84–116

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sapienza University of Rome, LABSITA, Piazza Borghese 9, 00186, Rome, Italy

    Pasquale Di Donato

Authors
  1. Pasquale Di Donato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Clayton School of Information Technology, Monash University, 3800, Clayton, VIC, Australia

    David Taniar

  2. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Perugia, Via Vanvitelli, 1, Perugia, 06123, Italy

    Osvaldo Gervasi

  3. L.I.S.U.T. - D.A.P.I.T., University of Basilicata, Viale dell’Ateneo Lucano 10, Potenza, 85100, Italy

    Beniamino Murgante

  4. Department of Computer Science and Computer Engineeering, LaTrobe University, 3086, Bundoora, VIC, Australia

    Eric Pardede

  5. Department of Intelligent Informatics, Kyushu Sangyo University, 813-8503, Fukuoka, Japan

    Bernady O. Apduhan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Di Donato, P. (2010). Geospatial Semantics: A Critical Review. In: Taniar, D., Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Pardede, E., Apduhan, B.O. (eds) Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2010. ICCSA 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6016. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12156-2_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12156-2_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12155-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12156-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation