Skip to main content

On the Benefit of Sub-optimality within the Divide-and-Evolve Scheme

  • Conference paper
Evolutionary Computation in Combinatorial Optimization (EvoCOP 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6022))

Abstract

Divide-and-Evolve (DaE) is an original “memeticization” of Evolutionary Computation and Artificial Intelligence Planning. DaE optimizes either the number of actions, or the total cost of actions, or the total makespan, by generating ordered sequences of intermediate goals via artificial evolution, and calling an external planner to solve each subproblem in turn. DaE can theoretically use any embedded planner. However, since the introduction of this approach only one embedded planner had been used: the temporal optimal planner CPT. In this paper, we propose a new version of DaE, using time-based Atom Choice and embarking the sub-optimal planner YAHSP in order to test the robustness of the approach and to evaluate the impact of using a sub-optimal planner rather than an optimal one, depending on the type of planning problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bibai, J., Schoenauer, M., Savéant, P.: Divide-And-Evolve Facing State-of-the-Art Temporal Planners during the 6th International Planning Competition. In: Cotta, C., Cowling, P. (eds.) EvoCOP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5482, pp. 133–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bibai, J., Savéant, P., Schoenauer, M., Vidal, V.: DAE: Planning as Artificial Evolution (Deterministic part). In: At International Planning Competition, IPC (2008), http://ipc.icaps-conference.org/

  3. Bibai, J., Savéant, P., Schoenauer, M., Vidal, V.: Learning Divide-and-Evolve Parameter Configurations with Racing. In: Coles, A., et al. (eds.) ICAPS 2009, Workshop on Planning and Learning. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brié, A.H., Morignot, P.: Genetic Planning Using Variable Length Chromosomes. In: Proc. ICAPS (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fikes, R., Nilsson, N.: STRIPS: A New Approach to the Application of Theorem Proving to Problem Solving. Artificial Intelligence 1, 27–120 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fox, M., Long, D.: PDDL2.1: An Extension to PDDL for Expressing Temporal Planning Domains. JAIR 20, 61–124 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gerevini, A., Saetti, A., Serina, I.: On Managing Temporal Information for Handling Durative Actions in LPG. In: Cappelli, A., Turini, F. (eds.) AI*IA 2003. LNCS, vol. 2829, pp. 91–104. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gerevini, A., Saetti, A., Serina, I.: Planning through Stochastic Local Search and Temporal Action Graphs in LPG. JAIR 20, 239–290 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Haslum, P., Geffner, H.: Admissible Heuristics for Optimal Planning. In: Proc. AIPS 2000, pp. 70–82 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Helmert, M.: The Fast Downward Planning System. JAIR 26(1), 191–246 (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoffmann, J., Nebel, B.: The FF Planning System: Fast Plan Generation Through Heuristic Search. JAIR 14, 253–302 (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Koza, J.R.: Genetic Programming: on the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. McDermott, D.: PDDL – The Planning Domain Definition language (1998), http://ftp.cs.yale.edu/pub/mcdermott

  14. Muslea, I.: SINERGY: A Linear Planner Based on Genetic Programming. In: Steel, S. (ed.) ECP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1348, pp. 312–324. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Richter, S., Helmert, M., Westphal, M.: Landmarks Revisited. In: Proc. AAAI 2008, pp. 975–982. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schoenauer, M., Savéant, P., Vidal, V.: Divide-and-Evolve: a New Memetic Scheme for Domain-Independent Temporal Planning. In: Gottlieb, J., Raidl, G.R. (eds.) EvoCOP 2006. LNCS, vol. 3906, pp. 247–260. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Schoenauer, M., Savéant, P., Vidal, V.: Divide-and-Evolve: a Sequential Hybridization Strategy using Evolutionary Algorithms. In: Michalewicz, Z., Siarry, P. (eds.) Advances in Metaheuristics for Hard Optimization, pp. 179–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Spector, L.: Genetic Programming and AI Planning Systems. In: Proc. AAAI 1994, pp. 1329–1334. AAAI/MIT Press (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vidal, V.: A Lookahead Strategy for Heuristic Search Planning. In: 14th International Conference on Automated Planning & Scheduling - ICAPS, pp. 150–160 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vidal, V., Geffner, H.: Branching and Pruning: An Optimal Temporal POCL Planner based on Constraint Programming. In: Proc. AAAI, pp. 570–577 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vidal, V., Geffner, H.: Branching and Pruning: An Optimal Temporal POCL Planner based on Constraint Programming. Artificial Intelligence 170(3), 298–335 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Westerberg, C.H., Levine, J.: “GenPlan”: Combining Genetic Programming and Planning. In: Garagnani, M. (ed.) 19th Workshop PLANSIG 2000, The Open University (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Westerberg, C.H., Levine, J.: Investigations of Different Seeding Strategies in a Genetic Planner. In: Boers, E.J.W., Gottlieb, J., Lanzi, P.L., Smith, R.E., Cagnoni, S., Hart, E., Raidl, G.R., Tijink, H. (eds.) EvoIASP 2001, EvoWorkshops 2001, EvoFlight 2001, EvoSTIM 2001, EvoCOP 2001, and EvoLearn 2001. LNCS, vol. 2037, pp. 505–514. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Yuan, B., Gallagher, M.: Statistical Racing Techniques for Improved Empirical Evaluation of Evolutionary Algorithms. In: Yao, X., Burke, E.K., Lozano, J.A., Smith, J., Merelo-Guervós, J.J., Bullinaria, J.A., Rowe, J.E., Tiňo, P., Kabán, A., Schwefel, H.-P. (eds.) PPSN 2004. LNCS, vol. 3242, pp. 172–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yuan, B., Gallagher, M.: Combining Meta-EAs and Racing for Difficult EA Parameter Tuning Tasks. In: Parameter Setting in Evolutionary Algorithms, pp. 121–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bibai, J., Savéant, P., Schoenauer, M., Vidal, V. (2010). On the Benefit of Sub-optimality within the Divide-and-Evolve Scheme. In: Cowling, P., Merz, P. (eds) Evolutionary Computation in Combinatorial Optimization. EvoCOP 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6022. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12139-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12139-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12138-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12139-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics