Skip to main content

Enhancing a Tabu Algorithm for Approximate Graph Matching by Using Similarity Measures

  • Conference paper
Evolutionary Computation in Combinatorial Optimization (EvoCOP 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6022))

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate heuristics in order to solve the Approximated Matching Problem (AGM). We propose a tabu search algorithm which exploits a simple neighborhood but is initialized by a greedy procedure which uses a measure of similarity between the vertices of the two graphs. The algorithm is tested on a large collection of graphs of various sizes (from 300 vertices and up to 3000 vertices) and densities. Computing times range from less than 1 second up to a few minutes. The algorithm obtains consistently very good results, especially on labeled graphs. The results obtained by the tabu algorithm alone (without the greedy procedure) were very poor, illustrating the importance of using vertex similarity during the early steps of the search process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abi-Antoun, M., Aldrich, J., Nahas, B., Schmerl, N., Garlan, D.: Differencing and merging of architectural views. Automated Software Engineering 15(1), 35–74 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barecke, T., Detyniecki, M.: Memetic algorithms for inexact graph matching. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2007, pp. 4238–4245 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benchmark for AGM, http://web.soccerlab.polymtl.ca/~sekpo/

  4. Bunke, H.: Error-tolerant graph matching: a formal framework and algorithms. In: Proc. Advances in Pattern Recognition, pp. 1–14 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crescenzi, P., Kann, V.: Approximation on the web: a compendium of np optimization problems. In: Rolim, J.D.P. (ed.) RANDOM 1997. LNCS, vol. 1269, pp. 111–118. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eshera, A.A., Fu, K.S.: A similarity measure between attributed relational graphs for image analysis. In: Proc. 7th Intl Conf. on Pattern Recognition, pp. 75–77 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Foggia, P., Sansone, C., Vento, M.: A database of graphs for isomorphism and subgraph isomorphism benchmarking. In: Proc. 3rd IAPR TC-15 Intl Workshop Graph-Based Representations in Pattern Recognition, pp. 176–187 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glover, F.: Tabu search-part i. ORSA Journal on Computing 1(3), 190–206 (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Gold, S., Rangarajan, A.: A graduated assignment algorithm for graph matching. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 18(4), 377–388 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kpodjedo, S., Ricca, F., Galinier, P.: Recovering the evolution stable part using an ecgm algorithm: Is there a tunnel in mozilla? In: European Conf. on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, vol. 0, pp. 179–188 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miller, G.L.: Graph isomorphism, general remarks. Journal of Computer and System Science 18(2), 128–142 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Raymond, J.W., Gardiner, E.J., Willett, P.: Rascal: calculation of graph simi- larity using maximum common edge subgraphs. Computer Journal 45(6), 631–644 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Toshev, A., Jianbo, S., Daniilidis, K.: Image matching via saliency region correspondences. In: CVPR 2007, IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 33–40 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, Y., Makedon, F., Ford, J., Huang, H.: A bipartite graph matching framework for finding correspondences between structural elements in two proteins. In: Proc. Int. Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medecine and Biology Society, pp. 2972–2975 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Williams, M.L., Wilson, R.C., Hancock, E.R.: Deterministic search strategies for relational graph matching. In: Pelillo, M., Hancock, E.R. (eds.) EMMCVPR 1997. LNCS, vol. 1223, pp. 261–275. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kpodjedo, S., Galinier, P., Antoniol, G. (2010). Enhancing a Tabu Algorithm for Approximate Graph Matching by Using Similarity Measures. In: Cowling, P., Merz, P. (eds) Evolutionary Computation in Combinatorial Optimization. EvoCOP 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6022. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12139-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12139-5_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12138-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12139-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics