Skip to main content

Absorptive Capacity and Social Capital: Innovation and Environmental Regulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Energy Systems ((ENERGY))

Abstract

Norwegian paper and pulp mills are subject to strict environmental regulation. The mills conduct research and development for reducing pollution. Absorptive capacity indicates their competence. Firms are part of a social network of connections with external actors that include other paper and pulp mills, suppliers, customers, research institutes, and universities that help them in developing technologies. These relations represent their social capital. Some firms have access to more and better resources than other firms. Measuring firms’ absorptive capacity and access to social capital, we analyze their success in reducing pollution levels. There is a strong interaction effect between absorptive capacity and social capital. The effectiveness of social capital depends on absorptive capacity, and absorptive capacity is not effective without social capital.

In collaboration with Rolf Golombek, The Frisch center, The University of Oslo, and Ken Harris, Melior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahuja, G. (2000). The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 317–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, W. D. (1993). Understanding regression assumptions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET 6.79. Natick: Analytic Technologies

    Google Scholar 

  • Bougrain, F., & Haudeville, B. (2002). Innovation, collaboration and SMEs internal research capacities. Research Policy, 31, 735–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1983). Economic capital, cultural capital, social capital. (Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital). Soziale Welt, Sonderheft, 2, 183–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouty, I. (2000). Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 50–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P., & Meyer, R. D. (1986). An analysis for unreplicated fractional factorials. Technometrics, 28(1), 11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, I. M., & Henderson, R. M. (1998). Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. The Journal of Industrial Economics, XLVI, 157–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 128–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94 Supplement, S95–S120

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996). A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science, 7(5), 477–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabrizio, K. R. (2009). Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation. Research Policy, 38(2), 255–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N. J. Husted, K., & Michailova, S. (2010). Governing knowledge sharing in organisations: Levels of analysis, mechanisms, and research directions. Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 455–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, S. M., & Leenders, R. T. A. J. (1999). CSC: The structure of advantage and disadvantage. In R. T. A. J. Leenders & S. M. Gabbay (Eds.), Corporate social capital and liability (pp. 1–14). Boston: Kluwer Academic Press

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, A., & Salaff, J. W. (2001). The development of corporate social capital in complex innovation processes. In S. M. Gabbay & R. T. A. J. Leenders (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 18): Social capital of organizations (pp. 107–134). Amsterdam: JAI Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, G. R. (1984). Bayesian statistical inference. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, J., & Turrisi, R. (2003). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D.-J., & Kogut, B. (1996). Technological platforms and diversifications. Organization Science, 17, 283–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiner, K., & Schultz, M. (1993). Informal collaboration in R&D: The formation of networks across organizations. Organization Studies, 14(2), 189–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 461–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenth, R. V. (1989). Quick and easy analysis of unreplicated fractional factorials. Technometrics, 31(4), 469–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, N. S., & Asahi, M. (1995). Cross-national alliances and interorganizational learning. Organizational Dynamics, 24, 50–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. R. (1998). Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: Implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Research Policy, 27, 507–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliance and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 77–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Niosi, J. (2003). Alliances are not enough explaining rapid growth in biotechnology firms. Research Policy, 32, 737–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W. (1998). Learning from collaboration: Knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. California Management Review, 40, 228–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doer, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., Smith-Doerr, L., & Owen-Smith, J. (1999). Network position and firm performance: Organizational returns to collaboration. In S. Andrews & D. Knoke (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 16, pp. 129–159). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M., & Larsen, J. K. (1984). Silicon Valley fever: Growth of high-technology culture. New York: Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Sall, J., Creihton, L., Lehman, A., et al. (2007). JMP start statistics: A guide to statistics and data analysis using JMP and JMP-IN software. Cary, NC: SAS Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2008). Lords of the dance: Professionals as institutional agents. Organization Studies, 29(2), 219–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T. A. B. (1999). Prologue to the measurement of social capital. The Tocqueville Review, XX(1), 27–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Soekijad, M., & Andriessen, E. (2003). Conditions for knowledge sharing in competitive alliances. European Management Journal, 21, 578–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, K., & Zelen, M. (1989). Rethinking centrality: Methods and applications. Social Networks, 11(1), 1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1987). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy. In D. J. Teece (Ed.), The competitive challenge: Strategies for industrial innovation and renewal. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. Oxford: New York University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfeldt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 4–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfeldt, B. (1995). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 171–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. P., & O’Brien, R. G. (1988). Power analysis in an enhanced GLM procedure: What it might look like. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SAS Users Group International Conference, Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Woody Powell, Simon Rodan, and other participants at the SCANCOR seminar for helpful comments, and also Joel Baum, Brian Silverman, Kristina Dahlin, and other participants at the research seminar at Rotman School of Business, Toronto. Howard Aldrich, Henrich Greve, Arne Kalleberg, and two reviewers for this book have given valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arent Greve .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Greve, A. (2010). Absorptive Capacity and Social Capital: Innovation and Environmental Regulation. In: Bjørndal, E., Bjørndal, M., Pardalos, P., Rönnqvist, M. (eds) Energy, Natural Resources and Environmental Economics. Energy Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12067-1_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12067-1_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12066-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12067-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics