Advertisement

Fractal Geometry of Architecture

Fractal Dimension as a Connection Between Fractal Geometry and Architecture
  • Wolfgang E. Lorenz
Chapter
Part of the Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering book series (BIOMEDICAL)

Abstract

In Fractals smaller parts and the whole are linked together. Fractals are self-similar, as those parts are, at least approximately, scaled-down copies of the rough whole. In architecture, such a concept has also been known for a long time. Not only architects of the twentieth century called for an overall idea that is mirrored in every single detail, but also Gothic cathedrals and Indian temples offer self-similarity. This study mainly focuses upon the question whether this concept of self-similarity makes architecture with fractal properties more diverse and interesting than Euclidean Modern architecture. The first part gives an introduction and explains Fractal properties in various natural and architectural objects, presenting the underlying structure by computer programmed renderings. In this connection, differences between the fractal, architectural concept and true, mathematical Fractals are worked out to become aware of limits. This is the basis for dealing with the problem whether fractal-like architecture, particularly facades, can be measured so that different designs can be compared with each other under the aspect of fractal properties. Finally the usability of the Box-Counting Method, an easy-to-use measurement method of Fractal Dimension is analyzed with regard to architecture.

Keywords

Fractal Dimension Reduction Factor Fractal Geometry Construction Rule Small Detail 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    B.B. Mandelbrot, Die fraktale Geometrie der Natur (Birkhäuser, Basel [u.a.], 1991)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Le Corbusier, 1922, Ausblick auf eine Architektur (Vieweg & Sohn, Braunschweig/ Wiesbaden, 1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    N.A. Salingaros, A theory of Architecture (Umbau-Verlag, Solingen, 2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H.-O. Peitgen, H. Jürgens, D. Saupe, Chaos and Fractals – New Frontiers of Science (Springer, New York, NY [u.a.], 1992)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. Bovill, Fractal Geometry in architecture and design (Birkhäuser, Boston, Mass. [u.a.], 1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Borcherdt, Architekten, Begegnungen 1956–1986 (Georg Müller Verlag, München, 1988)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Küper, I. van Zijl, Gerrit Th. Rietveld, The complete works (Centraal Museum, Utrecht, 1992)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Jencks, The Architecture of the Jumping Universe (Academy Editions, London, 1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Zerbst, Antoni Gaudí, 1852–1926 (ein Leben in der Architektur, Taschen, Köln, 1993)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Burry, Gaudí unseen – Die Vollendung der Sagrada Família (Jovis Verlag, Berlin, 2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Portoghesi, Nature and Architecture (Skira editore, Milan, 2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Lynn, Animate Form (Princeton Architectural Press, New York, NY, 1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Maertens, Der optische Maßstab (Verlag von Ernst Wasmuth, Berlin, 1884)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. Foroutan-pour, P. Dutilleul, D.L. Smith, in Applied Mathematics and Computation, Advances in the implementation of the box-counting method of Fractal Dimension estimation, vol. 105, Issue 2–3 (Elsevier Science Inc., New York, NY, 1999), pp. 195–210Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Hoffmann, Frank Lloyd Wright’s Robie House (Dover Publ., New York, NY, 1984)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    W.E. Lorenz, Master Thesis, Fractals and Fractal Architecture (Vienna University of Technology, 2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    W.E. Lorenz,in First International Conference on Fractal Foundations for the 21st century architecture and environmental design, Fractal Geometry as an approach to quality in architecture (ffractarq, Madrid, 2004), CD-ROMGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M.J. Ostwald, J. Vaughan, C. Tucker, in Nexus VII: Architecture and Mathematics, Characteristic Visual Complexity: Fractal Dimensions in the Architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright and Le Corbusier (Kim Williams Books, Turin, 2008) pp. 217–231Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M.J. Ostwald, C. Tucker, in Techniques and Technologies Transfer and Transformation: IVth International Conference of the Association of Architecture Schools of Australasia 2007, Measuring architecture: Questioning the application of non-linear mathematics in the analysis of historic buildings (University of Technology and AASA, Sydney, 2007), pp. 183–189Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    H.-O. Peitgen, D. Saupe, The science of Fractal images (Springer, New York, NY, 1988)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Digital Architecture and Planning (IEMAR) E259.1, Institute of Architectural SciencesVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations