Abstract
While Java and PHP are two of the most popular languages for open source web applications found at freshmeat.net , Java has had a much better security reputation than PHP. In this paper, we examine whether that reputation is deserved. We studied whether the variation in vulnerability density is greater between languages or between different applications written in a single language by comparing eleven open source web applications written in Java with fourteen such applications written in PHP. To compare the languages, we created a Common Vulnerability Metric (CVM), which is the count of four vulnerability types common to both languages. Common Vulnerability Density (CVD) is CVM normalized by code size. We measured CVD for two revisions of each project, one from 2006 and the other from 2008. CVD values were higher for the aggregate PHP code base than the Java code base, but PHP had a better rate of improvement, with a decline from 6.25 to 2.36 vulnerabilities/KLOC compared to 1.15 to 0.63 in Java. These changes arose from an increase in code size in both languages and a decrease in vulnerabilities in PHP. The variation between projects was greater than the variation between languages, ranging from 0.52 to 14.39 for Java and 0.03 to 121.36 in PHP for 2006. We used security and software metrics to examine the sources of difference between projects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ayewah, N., Pugh, W.J., Morgenthaler, D., Penix, J.: Zhou. Y.: Evaluating Static Analysis Defect Warnings On Production Software. In: The 7th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGSOFT Workshop on Program Analysis for Software Tools and Engineering (June 2007)
Christey, S.M., Martin, R.A.: http://www.cve.mitre.org/docs/vuln-trends/index.html (published May 22, 2007)
Coverity, Coverity Scan Open Source Report 2009, http://www.coverity.com/scan/ (September 23, 2009)
Fenton, N.E., Pfleeger, S.L.: Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach. Brooks/Cole, Massachusetts (1998)
Fortify Security Research Group and Larry Suto: Open Source Security Study (July 2008), http://www.fortify.com/landing/oss/oss_report.jsp
http://freshmeat.net/ (accessed September 27, 2009)
Li, Z., Tan, L., Wang, X., Lu, S., Zhou, Y., Zhai, C.: Have things changed now?: an empirical study of bug characteristics in modern open source software. In: Proceedings of the 1st workshop on Architectural and system support for improving software dependability, Association of Computing Machinery, New York, pp. 25–33 (2006)
Nagappan, N., Ball, T.: Static analysis tools as early indicators of pre-release defect density. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, Association of Computing Machinery, New York, pp. 580–586 (2005)
Shiflett, C.: PHP Security Consortium Redux, http://shiflett.org/blog/2005/feb/php-security-consortium-redux
Nagappan, N., Ball, T., Zeller, A.: Mining Metrics to Predict Component Failures. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering, Association of Computing Machinery, New York, pp. 452–461 (2006)
Neuhaus, S., Zimmerman, T.: The Beauty and the Beast: Vulnerabilities in Red Hat’s Packages. In: Proceedings of the 2009 USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX 2009), San Diego, CA, USA (June 2009)
Ozment, A., Schechter, S.E.: Milk or Wine: Does Software Security Improve with Age? In: Proceedings of the 15th USENIX Security Symposium, USENIX Association, California, pp. 93–104 (2006)
Shin, Y., Williams, L.: An Empirical Model to Predict Security Vulnerabilities using Code Complexity Metrics. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp. 315–317 (2008)
Shin, Y., Williams, L.: Is Complexity Really the Enemy of Software Security? In: Quality of Protection Workshop at the ACM Conference on Computers and Communications Security (CCS) 2008, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp. 47–50 (2008)
Walden, J., Doyle, M., Welch, G., Whelan, M.: Security of Open Source Web Applications. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Security Measurements and Metrics. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2009)
Zimmermann, T., Nagappan, N., Gall, H., Giger, E., Murphy, B.: Cross-project Defect Prediction. In: Proceedings of the 7th joint meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE 2009), Amsterdam, The Netherlands (August 2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Walden, J., Doyle, M., Lenhof, R., Murray, J. (2010). Idea: Java vs. PHP: Security Implications of Language Choice for Web Applications. In: Massacci, F., Wallach, D., Zannone, N. (eds) Engineering Secure Software and Systems. ESSoS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5965. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11747-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11747-3_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-11746-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11747-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)