Advertisement

Prototyping a Personal Health Record Taking Social and Usability Perspectives into Account

  • Enrico Maria Piras
  • Barbara Purin
  • Marco Stenico
  • Stefano Forti
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 27)

Abstract

This paper presents the process of design involved in prototyping a Personal Health Record (PHR), a patient-centered information and communication hub. As the PHR has to be used by laypeople, we focused on their health related activities (i.e. information management) carried out in the household using a sociological perspective to elicit the infrastructural requirements of the IT. We identified three distinct document management strategies (zero effort, erratic, networking) and ‘translated’ them into three design characteristics: flexibility, adaptability and customizability. We argue that the key to such PHR success is its capability to support the existing activities carried out by laypeople in managing their health record.

Keywords

Personal Health Record SOA 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Vikkelsø, S.: Subtle Redistribution of Work, Attention and Risks: Electronic Patient Records and Organisational Consequences. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 17(1), 3–30 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Østerlund, C.: Documents in Place: Demarcating Places for Collaboration in Healthcare Settings. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 17(2-3), 195–225 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Connecting for Health. The personal health working group final report. Markle Foundation (2003), http://www.connectingforhealth.org/resources/final_phwg_report1.pdf (May 1, 2009)
  4. 4.
    Moen, A., Gregory, J., Brennan, P.: Cross-cultural factors necessary to enable design of flexible consumer health informatics system (CHIS). Int. J. Med. Inf. 76S, S168–S173 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Star, S.L., Straus, A.: Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work. CSCW 1999 8(1-2), 9–30 (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Charmaz, K.: The grounded theory method: an explication and interpretation. In: Emerson, R.M. (ed.) Contemporary field research: a book of readings, pp. 109–126. Little, Brown, Boston (1983)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Josuttis, N.M.: SOA in practice. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    HL7 PHR System Functional Model (December 2008) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sujansky & Associates LLC. PHD Common Platform Components: Functional requirements (December 2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Newell Alan, F.: Older People as a focus for Inclusive Design.  4(4), 190–199 (March 2006), http://www.gerontechjournal.net (May 1, 2009)

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enrico Maria Piras
    • 1
  • Barbara Purin
    • 1
  • Marco Stenico
    • 1
  • Stefano Forti
    • 1
  1. 1.Fondazione Bruno Kessler (FBK)(Trento)Italy

Personalised recommendations