An Ontology of Therapies

  • Claudio Eccher
  • Antonella Ferro
  • Domenico M. Pisanelli
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 27)

Abstract

Ontologies are the essential glue to build interoperable systems and the talk of the day in the medical community. In this paper we present the ontology of medical therapies developed in the course of the Oncocure project, aimed at building a guideline based decision support integrated with a legacy Electronic Patient Record (EPR). The therapy ontology is based upon the DOLCE top level ontology. It is our opinion that our ontology, besides constituting a model capturing the precise meaning of therapy-related concepts, can serve for several practical purposes: interfacing automatic support systems with a legacy EPR, allowing the automatic data analysis, and controlling possible medical errors made during EPR data input.

Keywords

ontology therapy EPR NCI thesaurus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pinciroli, F., Pisanelli, D.M.: The unexpected high practical value of medical ontologies. Computers in Biology and Medicine 36(7-8), 669–673 (2006)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pisanelli, D.M. (ed.): Ontologies in Medicine. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guarino, N. (ed.): Formal Ontology in Information Systems. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Galligioni, E., Berloffa, F., Caffo, O., Tonazzolli, G., Ambrosini, G., Valduga, F., Eccher, C., Ferro, A., Forti, S.: Development and daily use of an electronic oncological patient record for the total management of cancer patients: 7 years’ experience. Ann. Oncol. (2008); Epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    de Coronado, S., Haber, M.W., Sioutos, N., Tuttle, M.S., Wright, L.W.N.: Thesaurus: Using Science-based Terminology to Integrate Cancer Research Results. In: Fieschi, M., Coiera, E., Li, Y.-C.J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 11th World Congress on Medical Informatics, MEDINFO 2004, San Francisco, CA, USA, Sep. 7-11, pp. 33–37. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    National Cancer Institute, Office for Communication, Center for Bioinformatics. NCI Terminology browser, ftp://ftp1.nci.nih.gov/pub/cacore/EVS/ (Last visited May 18, 2009)
  7. 7.
    Ceusters, W., Smith, B., Kumar, A., Dhaen, C.: Mistakes in Medical Ontologies: Where Do They Come From and How Can They Be Detected? In: Pisanelli, D.M. (ed.) Ontologies in Medicine. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W3C. OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. Recommendation (February 10, 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/ (Last visited May 18, 2009)
  9. 9.
    Laboratory for Applied Ontology. DOLCE: a Descriptive Ontology for Linguistice and Cognitive Engineering, http://www.loa-cnr.it/DOLCE.html (Last visited May 18, 2009)
  10. 10.
    Hawley, K.: How Things Persist. Clarendon Press, Oxford (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudio Eccher
    • 1
  • Antonella Ferro
    • 2
  • Domenico M. Pisanelli
    • 3
  1. 1.FBK-irstTrentoItaly
  2. 2.Medical Oncology Unit, S.Chiara HospitalTrentoItaly
  3. 3.CNR-Institute of Cognitive Science and TechnologiesRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations