Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Chirurgie der abdominalen und thorakalen Aorta pp 3–13Cite as

Ultraschallscreening des abdominellen Aortenaneurysmas – sinnvoll und notwendig

Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms makes sense

  • Chapter

  • 1638 Accesses

Part of the book series: Berliner Gefäßchirurgische Reihe ((BERLINGEFÄß,volume 11))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Ashton HA, Buxton MJ, Day NE, Kim LG, Marteau TM, Scott RA, et al. (2002) The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 360 (9345): 1531–1539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashton HA, Gao L, Kim LG, Druce PS, Thompson SG, Scott RA (2007) Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of ultrasonographic screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms 1. Br J Surg 94: 696–701

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chichester Aneurysm Screening Group; Viborg Aneurysm Screening Study; Western Australian Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Program; Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (2001) A comparative study of the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United Kingdom, Denmark, and Australia. J Med Screen 8 : 46–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eckstein HH, Böckler D, Flessenkämper I, Schmitz-Rixen T, Debus S, Lang W (2009) Ultraschall-Screening abdomineller Aortenaneurysmen (AAA) Deutsches Ärzteblatt 41: 697–664

    Google Scholar 

  5. Griffiths DAT, Ruitenberg EJ (1986) Preventive screening of adults. An evaluation of methods und programmes. Council of Europe, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kent KC, Zwolak RM, Jaff MR, Scott D, Hollenbeck T, Thompson RW, Schermerhorn ML, Sicard GA, Riles TS, Cronenwett JL (2004) Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: A consensus statement. J Vasc Surg 39: 267–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim LG, RAPS, Ashton HA, Thompson SG (2007) A sustained mortality benefit from screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm 2. Ann Intern Med146: 699–706

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lederle FA, Wilson SE, Johnson GR, Reinke DB, Littooy FN, Acher CW, et al. (2002) Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms, N Engl J Med 346: 1437–1444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Acher CW, Ballard DJ, Littooy FN, et al. (2003) Quality of life, impotence, and activity level in a randomized trial of immediate repair versus surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 38: 745–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lindholt JS (1998) Considerations and experiences of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Fadl’s Forlag, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lindholt JS, Norman P (2008) Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm reduces overall mortality in men. A meta-analysis of the mid- and long-term effects of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 36:167–171

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lindholt JS, Juul S, Henneberg EW, Fasting H (1998) Is screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm acceptable to the population? Selection and recruitment to hospitalbased mass screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Public Health Med 20: 211–217

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindholt JS, Vammen S, Juul S, Henneberg EW, Fasting H, (1999) The validity of ultrasonographic scanning as screening method for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 17: 472–475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lindholt JS, Vammen S, Fasting H, Henneberg EW (2000) Psychological consequences of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm and conservative treatment of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 20: 79–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lindholt JS, Juul S, Fasting H, Henneberg EW (2005) Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single centre randomised controlled trial. BMJ 330 (7494): 750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lindholt JS, Juul S, Fasting H, Henneberg EW (2006) Preliminary ten years results from a randomised single centre mass screening trial for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 32: 608–614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lindholt JS, Juul S, Henneberg EW (2007) High-risk and Low-risk Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Both Reduce Aneurysm-related Mortality. A Stratified Analysis from a Single-centre Randomised Screening Trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 34: 53–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Norman PE, Jamrozik K, Lawrence-Brown MM, Le MT, Spencer CA, Tuohy RJ, et al. (2004) Population based randomised controlled trial on impact of screening on mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm. BMJ 329 (7477): 1259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Powell JT (2000) Abdominal aortic aneurysm: natural history and risk of rupture. In: Branchereau A, Jacobs M (eds) Surgical and endovascular treatment od aortic aneurysms. Futura Publishing, EVC, pp 11–18

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scott RA, Wilson NM, Ashton HA, Kay DN (1995) Influence of screening on the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 5-year results of a randomized controlled study. Br J Surg 82 : 1066–1070

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Scott RA, Bridgewater SG, Ashton HA (2002) Randomized clinical trial of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in women. Br J Surg 89: 283–285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. The United Kingdom small aneurysm trial participants (2002) Long-term outcomes of immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 346: 1445–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. UK Small Aneurysm Trial Management Committee (1998) Health service costs and quality of life for early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Lancet 352: 1656–1660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants (1998) Mortality results for randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Lancet 352: 1649–1655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2005) Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Recommendation Statement Ann Intern Med142: 198–202

    Google Scholar 

  26. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/pocketgd.htm

  27. Vardulaki KA, Walter NM, Couto E, Day NE, Thompson SG, Ashton HA, et al. (2002) Late results concerning feasibility and compliance from a randomized trial of ultrasonographic screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 89: 861–864

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wilmink AB, Quick CR (1998) Epidemiology and potential for prevention of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 85:155–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wilson JMG, Jungner F (1968) Principles and practise of screening for disease. WHO Health Papers No. 34

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie Vaskuläre und Endovaskuläre Chirurgie, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, 69120, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg

    Prof. Dr. med. D. Böckler

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. med. D. Böckler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Hyhlik-Dürr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Debus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H.-H. Eckstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. ChA der Chirurgischen Klinik / Gefäßmedizin, Franziskus-Krankenhaus, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10787, Budapester Straße 15-19, Berlin

    Ralph I. Rückert

  2. 42719, Haaner Str. 114, Solingen

    Wolfgang Hepp

  3. HELIOS Klinikum Krefeld, Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie, 47805, Lutherplatz 40, Krefeld

    Bernd Luther

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Böckler, D., Hyhlik-Dürr, A., Debus, S., Eckstein, HH. (2011). Ultraschallscreening des abdominellen Aortenaneurysmas – sinnvoll und notwendig. In: Rückert, R.I., Hepp, W., Luther, B. (eds) Chirurgie der abdominalen und thorakalen Aorta. Berliner Gefäßchirurgische Reihe, vol 11. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11719-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11719-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-11718-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11719-0

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation