Method for Designing Networking Adaptive Interactive Hybrid Systems

  • Leon Kester
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 281)


Advances in network technologies enable distributed systems, operating in complex physical environments, to co-ordinate their activities over larger areas within shorter time intervals. Some envisioned application domains for such systems are defence, crisis management, traffic management and public safety. In these systems, humans and intelligent machines will, in close interaction, be able to adapt their behavior under changing conditions and situations to reach their common goals. Various architecture models are proposed for such Networking Adaptive Interactive Hybrid Systems (NAIHS) from different research areas such as sensor web technology, sensor fusion, command and control, cognitive science, ergonomics, agent technology, multi-agent systems and robotics. However, most of these models only cover part of the system are too much focussed on specific research areas and use different design philosophies for intelligent systems. In this article a top-down design methodology is proposed that may combine the merits of the various approaches and pave the way to efficient design and effective operation of such systems.


Situation Awareness Mixed Reality Human Machine Interaction Temporal Abstraction Abstraction Principle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    INternational Council On Systems Engineering (INCOSE),
  2. 2.
    Data fusion lexicon, US DoD, subpanel of the joint directors of laboratories (1991)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vee model of systems engineering design and integration, INCOSE G2SEBOK 3.30 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ackoff, R.: From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 16 (1989)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Albus, J.: Outline for a theory of intelligence. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 21(3) (1991)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bahill, A.T., Gissing, B.: Re-evaluating systems engineering concepts using systems thinking. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews 28(4), 516–527 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bakker, B., Kester, L., Vlassis, N., de Jong, E.: Workshop on hierarchical autonomous agents and multi-agent systems (H-AAMAS), AAMAS 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boyd, J.: A discourse on winning and losing. Maxwell AFB Lecture (1987)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brooks, R.: How to build complete creatures rather than isolated cognitive simulators. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1991)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Endsley, M.: Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd annual meeting, Santa Monica, CA, pp. 97–101 (1988)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feynman, R.: There’s plenty of room at the bottom. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the American Physical Society (1959)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    van Foeken, E., Kester, L.: Shared belief in communication constrained networks. In: Proceedings of IASTED International Conference on Sensor Networks SN 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fuster, J.: Upper processing stages of the perception-action cycle. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8, 143–145 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heylighen, F., Heath, M., van Overwalle, F.: Issue of cognitive systems research the emergence of distributed cognition: a conceptual framework (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    van Iersel, M., et al.: Creating shared situation awareness in a multi-platform sensor network. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Fusion, FUSION (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kester, L.J.: Model for networked adaptive interactive hybrid systems. In: Proceedings of COGnitive sytems and Interactive Sensors COGIS 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kester, L.J.: Rethinking the NAIHS model for NEC. In: Proceedings of SCI symposium on Agility and Resilience in NEC (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kurzweil, R.: The Singularity is Near. Viking, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martin, J.: The meaning of the 21st century. Penguin Books, London (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Neef, M., et al.: Organizing smart networks and humans into augmented teams. In: Proceedings of HCI 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Niv, Y., Botvinick, M., Barto, A.: Workshop on hierarchical organization of behavior: Computational, psychological and neural perspectives (2007),
  22. 22.
    Parnas, D.L.: Professional responsibility to blow the whistle on SDI. Abacus 4(2), 46–52 (1987)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Popper, K.: Logik der Forschung. Springer, Vienna (1934)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rasmussen, J.: The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decision making and system management. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 15, 234–243 (1985)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rechtin, E.: The Art of Systems Architecting. CRC Press, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smits, F., Huizing, A., Rossum, W.V., Hiemstra, P.: A cognitive radar network: Architecture and application to multiplatform radar management. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Radar Conference (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Steinberg, A., Bowman, C.: Rethinking the JDL data fusion levels. In: Proceedings of National Symposium on Sensor Data Fusion JHUAPL (2004)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    US Department of Defense C4ISR Architecture Working Group: Levels of Information Systems Interoperability (LISI) (1998)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zeleny, M.: Management support systems: Towards integrated knowledge management. Human Systems Management 7(1) (1987)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leon Kester
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.TNO Defence, Security and SafetyThe HagueThe Netherlands
  2. 2.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations