Introduction: Megacities in Latin America as Risk Habitat

  • Dirk Heinrichs
  • Kerstin Krellenberg
  • Bernd Hansjürgens
Chapter

Abstract

While the world has stepped into the century of cities, the emergence of the megacity is perhaps the most visible expression of the mega-trend urbanization. This introductory chapter discusses some features that characterize the megacity beyond its extraordinary population size. Furthermore, it outlines the main objectives of this book, discusses the key concepts risk, sustainability and governance and further elaborates on why and to what extent megacities are places of opportunities and risks. The chapter describes the geographical focus – Latin America – with Santiago de Chile as an anchor city and closes with a brief overview of the book.

Keywords

Governance Latin America Megacity Risk Sustainability 

References

  1. Adger, N. W. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16, 268–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaverstock, J. V., Smith, R. G., & Taylor, P. J. (1999). A roster of world cities. Cities, 16(6), 445–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., Helbing, D., Kuhnert, C., & West, G. B. (2007). Growth, innovation, scaling and the pace of life in cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA (PNAS), 104, 7301–7306.Google Scholar
  4. Borsdorf, A., & Hidalgo, R. (2007). New dimensions of social exclusion in Latin America: from gated communities to gated cities, the case of Santiago de Chile. Land Use Policy, 25, 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bronger, D. (1996). Megastädte. Geographische Rundschau, 48(5), 74–81.Google Scholar
  6. De Mattos, C. (2002). Mercado metropolitano de trabajo y desigualdades socials en el Gran Santiago. Una ciudad dual? EURE, 28(85), 51–70.Google Scholar
  7. Demeritt, D. (2002). What is the 'social construction of nature'? A typology and a sympathetic critique. Progress in Human Geography, 26(6), 767–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eash, C., Jasny, P. R., Roberts, L., Stone, R., & Sugden, A. M. (2008). Reimagining cities. Science, 319, 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ebert, A., Welz, J., Heinrichs, D., Krellenberg, K., & Hansjürgens, B. (2010). Socio-environmental change and flood risks: the case of Santiago de Chile. Erdkunde, 64(4), 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ECLAC (2000). From rapid urbanization to the consolidation of human settlements in Latin America and the Caribbean. A territorial perspective. Santiago de Chile: ECLAC.Google Scholar
  11. ECLAC (2005). Social panorama of Latin America. Santiago de Chile: ECLAC/CEPAL.Google Scholar
  12. Friedmann, J. (1986). The world city hypothesis. Development and Change, 17, 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grimm, N. B., Faeth, S. H., Golubiewski, N. E., Redman, C. L., & Wu, J. G. (2008). Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319, 756–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gurjar, B. R., & Lelieveld, J. (2005). New directions. Megacities and global change. Atmospheric Environment, 39, 391–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall, P. (1996). The world cities. London: World University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hansjürgens, B., Heinrichs, D., & Kuhlicke, C. (2008). Mega-urbanization, risk and social vulnerability. In K. Warner (Ed.), Megacities: Social vulnerability and resilience building (pp. 20–28). Summer Academy for Social Vulnerability. United Nations University UNU EHS and Munich Re Foundation, UNU PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Hardoy, J., Mitlin, D., & Satterswaite, D. (2001). Environmental problems in third world cities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Heinrichs, D., Kuhlicke, C., Meyer, V., & Hansjürgens, B. (2009). Mehr als nur Bevölkerung: Größe, Geschwindigkeit und Komplexität als Herausforderung für die Steuerung Megastädten. In U. Altrock, R. Kunze, E. Pahl-Weber, & D. Schubert (Eds.), Jahrbuch Stadterneuerung (pp.47–57). Arbeitskreis Stadterneuerung an deutschsprachigen Hochschulen und dem Institut für Stadt- und Regionalplanung der Technischen Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
  19. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (2010). World disaster report. Geneva: Focus on urban risk.Google Scholar
  20. Knight, F. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit. New York: Houghton Mifftlin.Google Scholar
  21. Mc Donald, R. I., Kareira, P., & Formana, R. T. T. (2008). The implication of current and future urbanization for global protected areas and biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 141, 1695–1703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mc Granahan, G., Balk, D., & Anderson, B. (2007). The rising tide: assessing the risks of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones. Environment and Urbanization, 19(1), 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mitchell, J. K. (Ed.) (1999). Crucibles of hazard. Megacities and disasters in transition. Tokyo: UN University.Google Scholar
  24. Montgommery, M. R., Stren, R., Cohen, B., & Reed, H. E. (Eds.) (2003). Cities transformed – Demographic change and its implications in the developing world. London: National Academic Press.Google Scholar
  25. MRC Mc Lean Hazel and GlobeScan (2007). Megacities und ihre Herausforderungen. München.Google Scholar
  26. Munich Re Group (2004). Megacities – Megarisks. Trends and challenges for insurance and risk management. München: Munich Re Group.Google Scholar
  27. National Research Council (2009). Driving and the built environment: The effects on of compact developments on motorized travel, energy use, and CO2 emissions. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.Google Scholar
  28. O'Keefe, P., Westgate, K., & Wisner, B. (1976). Taking the naturalness out of natural disasters. Nature, 260, 566–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pelling, M. (2003). The vulnerability of cities – Natural disasters and social resilience. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  30. Puente, S. (1999). Social vulnerability to disasters in Mexico City – An assessment method. In J. K. Mitchel (Ed.), Crucibles of hazards. Mega-cities and disasters in transition (pp. 295–334). Tokyo/New York/Paris: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Quigley, J. M. (1998). Urban diversity and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(2), 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Research, D. B. (2008). Megacitys: Wachstum ohne Grenzen? Aktuelle Themen, 412, 1–18.Google Scholar
  33. Rodriguez, J. (2002). Distribución territorial de la población de América Latina y el Caribe: tendencias, interpretaciones y desafíos para las políticas públicas. Población y Desarrollo del Centro Latinoamericano y Caribeño de Demografía (CELADE) – División de Población. Serie 32, Santiago de Chile.Google Scholar
  34. Rodriguez, J. (2008). Spatial distribution of the population, internal migration and development in Latin America and the Caribbean. Proceedings of the United Nations expert group meeting on population distribution, urbanization, internal migration and development New York, 21–23 January 2008.Google Scholar
  35. Sassen, S. (1991). The global city. New York/London/Tokio/Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Sassen, S. (2002). Locating cities on global circuits. Environment and Urbanization, 14(1), 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. TEEB (2010). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for local and regional policy makers. Edited by Wittmer H. and H. Gundimeda. www.teebweb.org
  38. UN HABITAT (2006). State of the world’s cities 2006/2007. The millennium development goals and urban sustainability. London.Google Scholar
  39. United Nations Population Division (2002). World urbanization prospects. The 2001 Revision. New York.Google Scholar
  40. United Nations Population Division (2004). World urbanization prospects. The 2003 Revision. New York.Google Scholar
  41. United Nations Population Division (2006). World Urbanization Prospects. The 2005 Revision. New York.Google Scholar
  42. United Nations Population Division (2007). World urbanization prospects. The 2006 Revision. New York.Google Scholar
  43. United Nations Population Division (2008). World urbanization prospects. The 2007 Revision. New York.Google Scholar
  44. Webster, Ch, & Lay, L. W. Ch. (2003). Property rights, planning and markets. Managing spontaneous cities. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward.Google Scholar
  45. Weichselgartner, J. (2001). Disaster mitigation: The concept of vulnerability revisited. Disaster Prevention and Management, 10(2), 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. White, G. F. (1945). Human adjustment to floods: A geographical approach to the flood problem in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  47. Wisner, B. (1999). There are worse things than earthquakes: Hazard vulnerability and mitigation capacity in Greater Los Angeles. In J. K. Mitchell (Ed.), Crucibles of hazards. Mega-cities and disasters in transition (pp. 375–427). Tokyo/New York/Paris: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., & Cannon, T. (2005). At risk. Natural hazards, people's vulnerability, and disasters. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung globale Umweltveränderungen (WBGU) (1996). Welt im Wandel: Wege zur Lösung globaler Umweltprobleme – Jahresgutachten 1995. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.Google Scholar
  50. World Water Assessment Programme (2009). The United Nations world water development report 3: Water in a changing world. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, and London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  51. Young, O. R., Berkhout, F., Gallophin, G. C., Janssen, M. A., Ostrom, E., & Van der Leeuw, S. (2006). The globalization of socio-ecological systems: An agenda for scientific research. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 304–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dirk Heinrichs
    • 1
  • Kerstin Krellenberg
    • 1
  • Bernd Hansjürgens
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Transport ResearchGerman Aerospace Center (DLR)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations