Skip to main content

Does the Choice of Prosthetic Mesh Type Make a Difference in Postherniorrhaphy Groin Pain?

  • Chapter

Abstract

Chronic pain is the most serious long-term complication of inguinal hernia repair. Up to one-third of patients will complain of some sort of pain at 1 year postoperatively, and in 3–4% of patients this pain will be severe and disabling [1, 2]. The causes of this pain are poorly understood, but factors such as nerve and tissue injury may be important. Psychological factors are also implicated, and more recently, the type of mesh used has been considered [3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bay-Neilson M, Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study. Ann Surg 2001; 233:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group. Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia, a randomised comparison. Lancet 1999; 354:185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lagenbach MR, Schmidt J, Zirngibl H. Comparison of biomaterials in the early postoperative period. Polyprolene meshes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 2003; 17:1105–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Post S, Weiss B, Willer M, Neufang T, Lorenz D. Randomised clinical trial of lightweight composite mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 2004; 91:44–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Junge K, Klinge U, Rosch R, Klosterhalfen B, Schumpelick V. Functional and morphological properties of a modified mesh for inguinal hernia repair. World J Surg 2002; 26:1472–1480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Willis PA. Hernia repair with polypropylene mesh, an improved method. AORN J 1990; 52:559–565

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Heniford BT. The argument for lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair. Surg Innov 2005; 12:63–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Klinge U. Mesh for hernia repair. Br J Surg 2008; 95:539–540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Page, B.P., O’Dwyer, P.J. (2010). Does the Choice of Prosthetic Mesh Type Make a Difference in Postherniorrhaphy Groin Pain?. In: Schumpelick, V., Fitzgibbons, R.J. (eds) Hernia Repair Sequelae. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11541-7_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11541-7_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04552-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11541-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics