Energy-Aware Dynamic Route Management for THAWS

  • Chong Shen
  • Sean Harte
  • Emanuel Popovici
  • Brendan O’Flynn
  • John Barton
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 24)

Abstract

In this research we focus on the Tyndall 25mm and 10mm nodes energy-aware topology management to extend sensor network lifespan and optimise node power consumption. The two tiered Tyndall Heterogeneous Automated Wireless Sensors (THAWS) tool is used to quickly create and configure application-specific sensor networks. To this end, we propose to implement a distributed route discovery algorithm and a practical energy-aware reaction model on the 25mm nodes. Triggered by the energy-warning events, the miniaturised Tyndall 10mm data collector nodes adaptively and periodically change their association to 25mm base station nodes, while 25mm nodes also change the inter-connections between themselves, which results in reconfiguration of the 25mm nodes tier topology. The distributed routing protocol uses combined weight functions to balance the sensor network traffic. A system level simulation is used to quantify the benefit of the route management framework when compared to other state of the art approaches in terms of the system power-saving.

Keywords

THAWS Energy-aware Routing Energy model Sensor network 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Harte, S., Popovici, E., O’Flynn, B., O’Mathuna, C.: THAWS: Automated Design and Deployment of Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks. WSEAS Trans. Circuits and Systems 7(9), 829–838 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harte, S., O’Flynn, B., Martinez-Catal, R., Popovici, E.: Design and Implementation of a Miniaturised, Low Power Wireless Sensor Node. In: Proc. 18th Euro. Conf. Circuit Theory and Design, Seville, pp. 894–897 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akyildiz, I., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, W., Cayirci, E.: Wireless Sensor Networks: a Survey. Computer Networks Elsevier Journal 38(4) (March 2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heinzelman, W., Kulik, J., Balakrishnan, H.: Adaptive Protocols for Information Dissemination in wireless sensor networks. In: Proc. of IEEE MobiCom., Seattle, WA (August 1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wattenhofer, R., Li, P., Wang, Y.: Distributed Topology Control for Power Efficient Operation in Multihop Wireless Ad Hoc Networks. In: Proc. of IEEE InfoCom (April 2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ganesan, D., Govindan, R., Shenker, S., Estrin, D.: Highly-Resilient, Energy-Efficient Multipath Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks. Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 1–2 (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shah, R., Rabaey, J.: Energy Aware Routing for Low Energy Ad Hoc Sensor Networks. In: Proc. of IEEE WCNC, Orlando, FL (March 2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Varga, A.: Using the OMNeT++ Discrete Event Simulation System in Education. IEEE Trans. on Education 42(4) (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    CLARITY: The Centre for Sensor Web Technologies Bringing Information to Life, http://www.clarity-centre.com
  10. 10.
    Chazelle, B., Rubinfeld, Trevisan, L.: Approximating the Minimum Spanning Tree Weight in Sublinear Time. Computation Journal, 1370–1379, 34 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leon-Garia, A., Widjaja, I.: Communications Networks. McGraw-Hill, New York (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chong Shen
    • 1
  • Sean Harte
    • 1
  • Emanuel Popovici
    • 1
  • Brendan O’Flynn
    • 1
  • John Barton
    • 1
  1. 1.CLARITY CentreTyndall National InstituteCorkIreland

Personalised recommendations