Advertisement

Carbon Dioxide Rebreathing During Pressure Support Ventilation with Airway Management System (BiPAP) Devices

  • Frédéric LofasoEmail author
  • Hélène Prigent
Chapter

Abstract

In the 1980s, the development of noninvasive ventilation using pressure support ventilation with or without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) constituted a major improvement in the management of both acute and chronic respiratory failure. Meanwhile, the first bilevel ventilator was designed (BiPAP; Respironics; Murrysville, PA). Initially intended to improve home treatment of sleep apnea syndrome, this device lacked alarms and monitoring systems but was easy to handle and low priced. It was a nasal continuous positive airway pressure device equi Carbon Dioxide Rebreathing During Pressure Support Ventilation with Airway Management System (BiPAP) DevicesF. Lofaso and H. Prigentpped with a solenoid magnetic valve system allowing separation of PEEP (with a minimal level below 2 cmH2O [1, 2]) and inspiratory positive airway pressure adjustments. Like other nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices designed for home, it used a single-limb circuit with a leak port (i.e., Respironics Whisper Swivel). Therefore, there was a risk of CO2 rebreathing, which was initially considered an important limitation for extending its use in the treatment of respiratory failure, especially hypercapnic respiratory failure, which was considered to have the best outcome with noninvasive ventilation.

Keywords

Pressure Support Ventilation Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Noninvasive Ventilation Peep Level Chronic Respiratory Failure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Lofaso F, Brochard L, Hang T et al (1996) Home versus intensive care pressure support devices. Experimental and clinical comparison. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 153:1591–1599PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lofaso F, Brochard L, Touchard D et al (1995) Evaluation of carbon dioxide rebreathing during pressure support ventilation with airway management system (BiPAP) devices. Chest 108: 772–778PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ferguson GT, Gilmartin M (1995) CO2 rebreathing during BiPAP ventilatory assistance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 151:1126–1135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lofaso F, Aslanian P, Richard JC et al (1998) Expiratory valves used for home devices: experimental and clinical comparison. Eur Respir J 11:1382–1388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hill NS, Carlisle C, Kramer NR (2002) Effect of a nonrebreathing exhalation valve on long-term nasal ventilation using a bilevel device. Chest 122:84–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schettino GP, Chatmongkolchart S, Hess DR et al (2003) Position of exhalation port and mask design affect CO2 rebreathing during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. Crit Care Med 31:2178–2182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Louis B, Leroux K, Isabey D et al (2010) Effect of manufacturer-inserted mask leaks on ventilator performance. Eur Respir J 35:627–636Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Racca F, Appendini L, Gregoretti C et al (2008) Helmet ventilation and carbon dioxide rebreathing: effects of adding a leak at the helmet ports. Intensive Care Med 34:1461–1468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Raymond Poincaré Teaching Hospital, Université Versailles-St Quentin en Yvelines, Physiology – Functional Testing, E.A. 4497 and CIC-ITAP-HPGarchesFrance

Personalised recommendations