Comparing Effects of Different Cinematic Visualization Strategies on Viewer Comprehension

  • Arnav Jhala
  • R. Michael Young
Conference paper

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-10643-9_6

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5915)
Cite this paper as:
Jhala A., Young R.M. (2009) Comparing Effects of Different Cinematic Visualization Strategies on Viewer Comprehension. In: Iurgel I.A., Zagalo N., Petta P. (eds) Interactive Storytelling. ICIDS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5915. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg


Computational storytelling systems have mainly focused on the construction and evaluation of textual discourse for communicating stories. Few intelligent camera systems have been built in 3D environments for effective visual communication of stories. The evaluation of effectiveness of these systems, if any, has focused mainly on the run-time performance of the camera placement algorithms. The purpose of this paper is to present a systematic cognitive-based evaluation methodology to compare effects of different cinematic visualization strategies on viewer comprehension of stories. In particular, an evaluation of automatically generated visualizations from Darshak, a cinematic planning system, against different hand-generated visualization strategies is presented. The methodology used in the empirical evaluation is based on QUEST, a cognitive framework for question-answering in the context of stories, that provides validated predictors for measuring story coherence in readers. Data collected from viewers, who watch the same story renedered with three different visualization strategies, is compared with QUEST’s predictor metrics. Initial data analysis establishes significant effect on choice of visualization strategy on story comprehension. It further shows a significant effect of visualization strategy selected by Darshak on viewers’ measured story coherence.


Intelligent Camera Control Computational Models of Narrative Discourse Comprehension Visual Discourse 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arnav Jhala
    • 1
  • R. Michael Young
    • 2
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaSanta Cruz
  2. 2.North Carolina State UniversityRaleigh

Personalised recommendations