Narrative Development in Improvisational Theatre

  • Allan Baumer
  • Brian Magerko
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5915)

Abstract

We have investigated the experience of improvisers as they perform to better understand how narrative is constructed by group performance in improvisational theatre. Our study was conducted with improvisers who would perform improv “games” with each iteration video recorded. Each individual participant was shown the video in a retrospective protocol collection, before reviewing it again in a group interview. This process is meant to elicit information about how the cognition involved develops narrative during an improvisation performance. This paper presents our initial findings related to narrative development in improvisational theatre with an ambition to use these and future analyses in creating improvisational intelligent agents. These findings have demonstrated that the construction of narrative is crafted through the making and accepting of scene-advancing offers, which expert improvisers are more readily capable of performing.

Keywords

Improvisation Cognition Performance Narrative 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Johnstone, K.: Impro: Improvisation and the Theatre. Routledge / Theatre Arts, New York (1981)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Close, D., Halpern, C., Johson, K.: Truth in Comedy. Meriwether Publishing Ltd., Colorado (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sarath, E.: A New Look at Improvisation. Journal of Music Theory 40(1), 1–38 (1996)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mendonça, D., Wallace, W.: Cognition in Jazz Performance: An Exploratory Study. In: Forbus, K., Gentner, D., Regier, T. (eds.) Proc. 26th CogSci. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mendonça, D., Wallace, W.: A Cognitive Model of Improvisation in Emergency Management. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans 37(4), 547–561 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Swartjes, I., Vromen, J.: Emergent Story Generation: Lessons from Improvisational Theatre. In: AAAI Fall Symposium on Intelligent Narrative Technologies, pp. 9–11. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hayes-Roth, B., Sincoff, E., Brownston, L., Huard, R., Lent, B.: Directed Improvisation. Technical Report KSL-94-61, Knowledge Systems Laboratory. Stanford University, CA (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Perlin, K., Goldberg, A.: Improv: A System for Scripting Interactive Actors in Virtual Worlds. In: Fujii, J. (ed.) 23rd SIGGRAPH, pp. 205–216. ACM Press, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pressing, J.: Psychological Constraints on Improvisation. In: Nettl, B., Russell, M. (eds.) The Course of Performance, Studies in the World of Musical Improvisation, pp. 47–67. University of Chicago Press, Berkeley (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reinholdsson, R.: Making Music Together: An Interactionist Perspective on Small-Group Performance in Jazz. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis: Studia Musicologica Upsaliensia, Nova Series 14, Uppsala University (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weick, K.E.: Introductory Essay: Improvisation as a Mindset for Organizational Analysis. Organization Science 9(5), 543–555 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yokochi, S., Okada, T.: Creative Cognitive Process of Art Making: A Field Study of a Traditional Chinese Ink Painter. Creativity Research Journal 17(2&3), 241–255 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hayes-Roth, B., van Gent, R.: Story-Making with Improvisational Puppets and Actors. Technical Report KSL-96-09, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University. Stanford University, Palo Alto (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bates, J., Loyall, A.B., Reilly, W.S.: Broad Agents. In: Proc. AAAI Spring Symposium on Integrated Intelligent Architectures, SIGART Bulletin 2(4), 38–40 (1991)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aylett, R., Louchart, S., Dias, J., Paiva, A.: FearNot! - An Experiment in Emergent Narrative. In: Panayiotopoulos, T., Gratch, J., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Olivier, P., Rist, T. (eds.) IVA 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3661, pp. 305–316. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Riedl, M.O., Stern, A.: Believable Agents and Intelligent Story Adaptation for Interactive Storytelling. In: Göbel, S., Malkewitz, R., Iurgel, I. (eds.) TIDSE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4326, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Young, R.M., Riedl, M.O., Branly, M., Jhala, A., Martin, R.J., Saretto, C.J.: An Architecture for Integrating Plan-based Behavior Generation with Interactive Game Environments. Journal of Game Development 1, 51–70 (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chatman, S.: Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1980)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ryan, M.: Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence, and Narrative Theory. Indiana University Press, Bloomington (1991)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Prince, G.: Dictionary of Narratology. University of Nebraska Press, Nebraska (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pressing, J.: Improvisation: Methods and Models. In: Sloboda, J. (ed.) Generative Processes in Music, pp. 129–178. Oxford University Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Newell, A.: Unified Theories of Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1990)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allan Baumer
    • 1
  • Brian Magerko
    • 1
  1. 1.Adaptive Digital Media LabGeorgia Institute of Technology 

Personalised recommendations