Advertisement

Herz

  • G. A. Krombach
Chapter
  • 1.9k Downloads

Zusammenfassung

Während der Embryogenese liegt das Herz zunächst vollständig symmetrisch im Thorax. Während der Entwicklung entsteht eine Rotationsbewegung des Herzens. Der Apex (die Herzspitze) wird hierbei leicht angehoben und rotiert nach links, sodass später zwei Drittel des Herzens links, ein Drittel rechts der Mittellinie liegen. Der rechte Ventrikel kommt durch die Rotationsbewegung unmittelbar hinter dem Sternum zum liegen. Der rechte Vorhof wird rechts randbildend, der linke Ventrikel wird links randbildend und der linke Vorhof liegt dorsal (◘ Abb. 5.1).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Achenbach S, Barkhausen J, Beer M et al. (2012) [Consensus recommendations of the German Radiology Society (DRG), the German Cardiac Society (DGK) and the German Society for Pediatric Cardiology (DGPK) on the use of cardiac imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging]. Rofo 184: 345–368Google Scholar
  2. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V et al. (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105: 539–542Google Scholar
  3. Friedrich MG, Sechtem U, Schulz-Menger J et al. (2009) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis: A JACC White Paper. J Am Coll Cardiol 53: 1475–1487Google Scholar
  4. Giang T H, Nanz D, Coulden R et al. (2004) Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: first European multi-centre experience. Eur Heart J 25: 1657–1665Google Scholar
  5. Greenwood J P, Maredia N, Younger JF et al. (2012) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet 379: 453–460Google Scholar
  6. Kellman P, Arai AE, McVeigh ER, Aletras AH (2002) Phase-sensitive inversion recovery for detecting myocardial infarction using gadolinium-delayed hyperenhancement. Magn Reson Med 47: 372–383Google Scholar
  7. Look D, Locker D (1970. Time saving measurement of NMR and EPR relaxation times. Rev Sci Instrum. 41: 250–251Google Scholar
  8. Lotz J, Kivelitz D, Fischbach R, Beer M, Miller S (2009) [Recommendations for utilizing computerized tomography and magnetic resonance tomography in heart diagnosis. 2-Magnetic resonance tomography]. Rofo 181: 800–814Google Scholar
  9. Maron BJ, Towbin JA, Thiene G et al. (2006) Contemporary definitions and classification of the cardiomyopathies: an American Heart Association Scientific Statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Heart Failure and Transplantation Committee; Quality of Care and Outcomes Research and Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Groups; and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation 113: 1807–1816Google Scholar
  10. Richardson P, McKenna W, Bristow M et al. (1996) Report of the 1995 World Health Organization/International Society and Federation of Cardiology Task Force on the Definition and Classification of cardiomyopathies. Circulation 93: 841–842Google Scholar
  11. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M et al. (1989) Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2: 358–367Google Scholar
  12. Schwitter J, Wacker CM, Wilke N et al. (2013) MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial. Eur Heart J 34(10): 775–81Google Scholar
  13. Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS et al. (2001) An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. Radiology 218: 215–223Google Scholar
  14. Wolff SD, Schwitter J, Coulden R et al. (2004) Myocardial first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter dose-ranging study. Circulation 110: 732–737Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. A. Krombach
    • 1
  1. 1.Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie Universitätsklinikum GießenJustus Liebig Universität GießenGießen

Personalised recommendations