Advertisement

Evolutionary Intelligence and Communication in Societies of Virtually Embodied Agents

  • Binh Nguyen
  • Andrew Skabar
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5865)

Abstract

In order to overcome the knowledge bottleneck problem, AI researchers have attempted to develop systems that are capable of automated knowledge acquisition. However, learning in these systems is hindered by context (i.e., symbol-grounding) problems, which are caused by the systems lacking the unifying structure of bodies, situations and needs that typify human learning. While the fields of Embodied Artificial Intelligence and Artificial Life have come a long way towards demonstrating how artificial systems can develop knowledge of the physical and social worlds, the focus in these areas has been on low level intelligence, and it is not clear how, such systems can be extended to deal with higher-level knowledge. In this paper, we argue that we can build towards a higher level intelligence by framing the problem as one of stimulating the development of culture and language. Specifically, we identify three important limitations that face the development of culture and language in AI systems, and propose how these limitations can be overcome. We will do this through borrowing ideas from the evolutionary sciences, which have explored how interactions between embodiment and environment have shaped the development of human intelligence and knowledge.

Keywords

context recognition symbol grounding embodiment artificial life emergent culture and language evolutionary biology and psychology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, M.L.: Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence 149(1), 91–130 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baldassarre, G., Nolfi, S., Parisi, D.: Evolving mobile robots able to display collective behaviours. Artificial Life 9, 255–267 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boyd, R., Richerson, P.J.: Why Culture is Common but Cultural Evolution is Rare. In: Proceedings of the British Academy, vol. 88, pp. 73–93 (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Canamero, L., Avila-Garcia, O., Hafner, E.: First Experiments Relating Behaviour Selection Architectures to Environmental Complexity. In: Proceedings of 2002 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp. 3024–3029 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cangelosi, A.: Evolution of communication and language using signals, symbols and words. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 5, 93–101 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cangelosi, A., Harnad, S.: The adaptive advantage of symbolic theft over sensorimotor toil: Grounding language in perceptual categories. Evolution of Communication 4, 117–142 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dawkins, R.: The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1976)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Di Paolo, E.A.: Behavioural coordination, structural congruence and entrainment in a simulation of acoustically couped agents. Adaptive Behaviour 8, 25–46 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dreyfus, H.L.: What Computers Still Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Flinn, M.V., Ward, C.W., Noone, R.J.: Hormones and the Human Family. In: Buss, D.M. (ed.) The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, pp. 552–580. Wiley, Hoboken (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harnad, S.: The Symbol Grounding Problem. Phys. D 42, 335–346 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Humphrey, N.: The social function of intellect. In: Humphrey, N. (ed.) Consciousness Regained: Chapters in the Development of Mind, pp. 14–28. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1983)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Knight, C., Studdert-Kennedy, M., Hurford, J.R.: Language: A Darwinian Adaptation? In: Knight, C., Hurford, J., Studdert-Kennedy, M. (eds.) The Evolutionary Emergence of Language: Social function and the origins of linguistic form, pp. 1–15. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marocco, D., Nolfi, S.: Emergence of communication in teams of embodied and situated agents. In: Cangelosi, A., Smith, A.D.M., Smith, K. (eds.) Proceeding of the VI International Conference on the Evolution of Language, pp. 198–205 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nolfi, S.: Emergence of Communication in Embodied Agents: Co-Adapting Communicative and Non-Communicative Behaviours. Connection Science 17, 231–248 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parisi, D., Cecconi, F., Nolfi, S.: Econets: Neural networks that learn in an environment. Network 1, 149–168 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pfeifer, R., Iida, F.: Embodied Artificial Intelligence: Trends and Challenges. In: Iida, F., Pfeifer, R., Steels, L., Kuniyoshi, Y. (eds.) Embodied Artificial Intelligence. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3139, pp. 1–26. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pfeifer, R., Bongard, J.C.: How the Body Shapes the Way We Think: A New View of Intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Plotkin, H.C.: Darwin Machines and the Nature of Knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Prem, E.: Symbol Grounding Revisited. Technical Report TR-94-19. Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence. Vienna (1994)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Quinn, M., Smith, L., Mayley, G., Husbands, P.: Evolving Controllers for a homogeneous system of physical robots: Structure cooperation with minimal sensors. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 361, 2321–2344 (2003)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Roy, D.: Grounded spoken language acquisition: experiments in word learning. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 5(2), 197–209 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sims, K.: Evolving Virtual Creatures. Computer Graphics, 15–22 (1994)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Steels, L.: The origins of syntax in visually grounded robotic agents. Artificial Intelligence 103, 133–156 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vogt, P., Divina, F.: Social symbol grounding and language evolution. Interaction Studies 8, 31–52 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wagner, K., Reggia, J.A., Uriagereka, J., Wilkinson, G.S.: Progress in the Simulation of Emergent Communication and Language. Adaptive Behaviour 11, 37–69 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yaeger, L.: Computational Genetics, Physiology, Metabolism, Neural Systems, Learning, Vision, and Behaviour or PolyWorld: Life in a New Context. In: Proceedings of the Artificial Life III Conference, pp. 263–298. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1994)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ziemke, T.: Embodied AI as Science: Models of Embodied Cognition, Embodied Models of Cognition, or Both? In: Iida, F., Pfeifer, R., Steels, L., Kuniyoshi, Y. (eds.) Embodied Artificial Intelligence. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3139, pp. 27–36. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Binh Nguyen
    • 1
  • Andrew Skabar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Computer EngineeringLa Trobe UniversityVictoriaAustralia

Personalised recommendations