Skip to main content

Ambient Rabbits Likeability of Embodied Ambient Displays

  • Conference paper
Ambient Intelligence (AmI 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5859))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper discusses the possibility of using embodied Ambient Displays for presenting information in a public setting. For embodying an Ambient Display, a Nabaztag rabbit was used, the information displayed was a weather forecast. Throughout four weeks of alternating traditional visual Ambient Displays and Nabaztag testing, differences and commonalities in terms of perceived usability and likeability have been investigated. Special focus has been put on the likeability and comprehension differences. Results show a correlation between perceived usability and likeability for the traditional Ambient Display as well as a better comprehension over time for both Ambient Displays. However, significant differences in terms of perceived usability and likeability could only be revealed for the traditional Ambient Displays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Weiser, M.: The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American 265(3), 94–104 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ishii, H., Ullmer, B.: Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In: CHI 1997, pp. 234–241. ACM Press, New York (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Matthews, T., Dey, A.K., Mankoff, J., Carter, S., Rattenbury, T.: A toolkit for managing user attention in peripheral displays. In: UIST 2004, pp. 247–256. ACM, New York (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Stasko, J., Doo, M., Dorn, B., Plaue, C.: Explorations and experiences with ambient information systems. In: Workshop on Ambient Information Systems at Pervasive 2007, May 2007, pp. 36–41 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mankoff, J., Dey, A.K., Hsieh, G., Kientz, J., Lederer, S., Ames, M.: Heuristic evaluation of ambient displays. In: CHI 2003, pp. 169–176. ACM, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Tscheligi, M., Reitberger, W., Obermair, C., Ploderer, B.: perCues: Trails of Persuasion for Ambient Intelligence. In: IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3962, pp. 203–206. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Neely, S., Stevenson, G., Nixon, P.: Assessing the suitability of context information for ambient displays. In: Workshop Ambient Information Systems at Pervasive 2007, May 2007. CEUR Workshop, CEUR-WS.org, vol. 254 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jafarinaimi, N., Forlizzi, J., Hurst, A., Zimmerman, J.: Breakaway: an ambient display designed to change human behavior. In: CHI 2005, pp. 1945–1948. ACM, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Hazlewood, W.R., Coyle, L., Pousman, Z., Kyung Lim, Y.: Ambient Information Systems 2008 - Introduction. In: 2nd Workshop on Ambient Information Systems, September 2008. CEUR Workshop, vol. 402 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Neely, S., Stevenson, G., Kray, C., Mulder, I., Connelly, K., Siek, K.A.: Evaluating pervasive and ubiquitous systems. IEEE Pervasive Computing 7(3), 85–88 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Holmquist, L.E.: Evaluating the comprehension of ambient displays. In: CHI 2004: Extended abstracts, pp. 1545–1545. ACM, New York (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Pousman, Z., Stasko, J.: Ambient Information Systems: Evaluation in Two Paradigms. In: Workshop Ambient Information Systems at Pervasive 2007, May 2007, pp. 25–29 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shen, X., Eades, P., Hong, S., Moere, A.V.: Intrusive and non-intrusive evaluation of ambient displays. In: Workshop Ambient Information Systems at Pervasive 2007, May 2007. CEUR Workshop, vol. 254 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brooke, J.: SUS: A ‘quick and dirty’ usability scale. In: Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 189–194. Taylor & Francis, Abington (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bartneck, C., Croft, E., Kulic, D.: Measuring the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence and perceived safety of robots. In: Metrics for HRI Workshop, Technical Report 471, University of Hertfordshire, pp. 37–44 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hazlewood, W.R., Connelly, K., Makice, K., Lim, Y.k.: Exploring evaluation methods for ambient information systems. In: CHI 2008, pp. 2973–2978. ACM, New York (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mirlacher, T., Buchner, R., Förster, F., Weiss, A., Tscheligi, M. (2009). Ambient Rabbits Likeability of Embodied Ambient Displays. In: Tscheligi, M., et al. Ambient Intelligence. AmI 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5859. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05408-2_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05408-2_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05407-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-05408-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics