Advertisement

Information Demand Context Modelling for Improved Information Flow: Experiences and Practices

  • Magnus Lundqvist
  • Eva Holmquist
  • Kurt Sandkuhl
  • Ulf Seigerroth
  • Jan Strandesjö
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 39)

Abstract

The paper addresses the field of modelling information demand context, which can be considered as an application of enterprise modelling techniques with focus on capturing information demands. Based on industrial cases from automotive industries, experiences and practices of information demand modelling are presented and investigated. This includes the specific perspective taken in the method for information demand analysis, common challenges experienced in demand modelling, the validity of practices from participative enterprise modelling for context modelling and practices of context modelling.

Keywords

Enterprise Modelling Information Demand Information Logistics Context Modelling Information Demand Context 

References

  1. 1.
    Harmon, P.: The Scope and Evolution of Business Process Management. In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davenport, T.H.: Process Innovation. Reengineering Work Through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Humphrey, W.S.: Software Process The improvement – A Personal View: How it Started and Where it is Going. Software Process The Improvement and Practice 12, 223–227 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Warner, B.W.: Organisational Development - A Process of Learning and Changing. Addison Wesley, Reading (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deiters, W., Löffeler, T., Pfenningschmidt, S.: The Information Logistical Approach Toward a User Demand-driven Information Supply. In: Spinellis, D. (ed.) Cross-Media Service Delivery, pp. 37–48. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Öhgren, A., Sandkuhl, K.: Information Overload in Industrial Enterprises - Results of an Empirical Investigation. In: Proceedings ECIME 2008, London, UK (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lundqvist, M.: Context as a Key Concept in Information Demand Analysis. In: Proceedings of the Doctoral Consortium associated with the 5th Intl. and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modelling and Using Context (Context 2005), Paris, France, pp. 63–73 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lundqvist, M.: Information Demand and Use: Improving Information Flow within Small-scale Business Contexts. Linköping studies in science and technology, Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping, Sweden (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Röstlinger, A., Goldkuhl, G.: På väg mot en komponentbaserad metodsyn (in Swedish). Presented at VITS Höstseminarium 1994, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden (1994)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ralyté, J., Backlund, P., Kühn, H., Jeusfeld, M.A.: Method Chunks for Interoperability. In: Embley, D.W., Olivé, A., Ram, S. (eds.) ER 2006. LNCS, vol. 4215, pp. 339–353. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mirbel, I., Ralyté, J.: Situational method engineering: combining assembly-based and roadmap-driven approaches. Requirements Eng. 11, 58–78 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brinkkemper, S.: Method engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and tools. Information and Software Technology 1995, 37 (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Avison, D.E., Fitzgerald, G.: Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools. McGraw Hill, Berkshire (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goldkuhl, G., Cronholm, S.: Customizable CASE environments: A Framework for Design and Evaluation. Accepted to COPE IT 1993/NordDATA, Copenhagen, June 14-16 (1993)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goldkuhl, G., Lind, M., Seigerroth, U.: Method integration: the need for a learning perspective. IEE Proceedings, Software (special issue on Information System Methodologies) 145(4) (August 1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lind, M., Seigerroth, U.: Team-based reconstruction for expanding organisational ability. Journal of the Operational Society 54, 119–129 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stirna, J., Persson, A., Sandkuhl, K.: Participative enterprise modeling: Experiences and recommendations. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007 and WES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 546–560. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Magnus Lundqvist
    • 1
  • Eva Holmquist
    • 2
  • Kurt Sandkuhl
    • 1
  • Ulf Seigerroth
    • 1
  • Jan Strandesjö
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Engineering at Jönköping UniversityJönköpingSweden
  2. 2.SYSteam Management ABHuskvarnaSweden
  3. 3.Proton FinishingVärnamoSweden

Personalised recommendations