Skip to main content

Modelling Species’ Distributions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Species distribution models have become a commonplace exercise over the last 10 years, however, analyses vary due to different traditions, aims of applications and statistical backgrounds. In this chapter, I lay out what I consider to be the most crucial steps in a species distribution analysis: data pre-processing and visualisation, dimensional reduction (including collinearity), model formulation, model simplification, model type, assessment of model performance (incl. spatial autocorrelation) and model interpretation. For each step, the most relevant considerations are discussed, mainly illustrated with Generalised Linear Models and Boosted Regression Trees as the two most contrasting methods. In the second section, I draw attention to the three most challenging problems in species distribution modelling: identifying (and incorporating into the model) the factors that limit a species range; separating the fundamental, realised and potential niche; and niche evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    boxcox in MASS (typewriter and bold are used to refer to a function and its R-package)

  2. 2.

    Phillips et al. (2006b): http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~schapire/maxent/

  3. 3.

    transcan and aregImpute in Hmisc

  4. 4.

    scale

  5. 5.

    prcomp

  6. 6.

    isoMDS in MASS or, more conveniently, metaMDS in vegan

  7. 7.

    pairs

  8. 8.

    This can be done either manually (X1.2 <- X1^2) or as part of the model formula (y ~ X1 + I(X1^2)); higher-order polynomials should be specified using poly (y ~ poly(X1, degree=3)), which calculates orthogonal polynomials.

  9. 9.

    As proposed for the function gam in package gam: see ?gam::step.gam.

  10. 10.

    As proposed for the function gam in package mgcv: see ?mgcv::step.gam.

  11. 11.

    http://www.machinelearning.org/ is a good place to start exploring this field.

  12. 12.

    Most of these “complications” can be handled by standard extensions of GLMs (see, e.g. Bolker 2008, and various dedicated R-packages). They will, however, make the model less stable, require larger run-times and still rely on getting the distribution right. There is, of course, the alternative of Bayesian implementations. Since these are also fundamentally maximum likelihood approaches, they are similar to sophisticated GLMs. In any case, there is no Bayesian Boosted Regression Tree (not to speak of a combination with spatial terms and mixed effects). It runs against the Bayesian philosophy to use boosting or bagging, and there is no efficient implementation either.

  13. 13.

    Diagnostics for GLMs fitted in R are given by plotting the model object.

  14. 14.

    Actually, the term “equilibrium” is a bit misleading. What is meant is that the entire width of its niche is filled. Within this niche, there may well be unoccupied sites, e.g. due to metapopulation dynamics. A problem arises, when a species does not occupy say the dry end of its soil moisture niche for historic reasons. Then the estimate of this end of the niche will be biased.

Acknowledgments

Over the years, many colleagues helped develop the above recipe. I am particularly grateful to Boris Schröder, Björn Reineking and Jane Elith, as well as the many participants of statistical workshops on this topic. I am also grateful to Fred Jopp, Hauke Reuter and Dietmar Kraft for improving a previous version. Funding by the Helmholtz Association is acknowledged (VH-NG-247).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carsten F. Dormann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dormann, C.F. (2011). Modelling Species’ Distributions. In: Jopp, F., Reuter, H., Breckling, B. (eds) Modelling Complex Ecological Dynamics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05029-9_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics