Skip to main content

The Efficacy of Horizontal and Vertical Bone Augmentation Procedures for Dental Implants: A Cochrane Systematic Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evidence-Based Practice: Toward Optimizing Clinical Outcomes

Abstract

Some patients may have insufficient bone to place dental implants, but there are many sur­gical techniques to increase the bone volume making implant treatment possible. Short implants appear to be more effective and cause fewer complications than conventional implants placed in resorbed lower jaws augmented with autogenous bone or bone substitutes (cow bone blocks). Bone can be regenerated in a horizontal and vertical direction using various techniques, but it is unclear which techniques are preferable. Complications especially for augmenting bone vertically are frequent. Some bone substitutes may cause less complications and pain than autogenous bone. Osteodistraction osteogenesis allows for more vertical bone augmentation than other techniques, which, on the other hand, can allow for horizontal augmentation at the same time. This review is based on a Cochrane systematic review entitled “Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone ­augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment” published in The Cochrane Library (see www.cochrane.org for information). Cochrane systematic reviews are regularly updated to include new research and in response to comments and criticisms from readers. If you wish to comment on this review, please send your ­comments to the Cochrane website or to Marco Esposito. The Cochrane Library should be consulted for the most recent version of the review. The results of a Cochrane Review can be interpreted differently, depending on people’s perspectives and circumstances. Please consider the conclusions presented carefully. They are the opinions of the review authors, and are not necessarily shared by the Cochrane Collaboration.

This paper is based on a Cochrane Review published in The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 4 (see www.thecochranelibrary.com for information). Cochrane Reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to feedback, and The Cochrane Library should be consulted for the most recent version of the review.

Conflict-of-interest statement: Pietro Felice and Marco Esposito are among the authors of some of the included trials; however, they were not involved in the quality assessment of these trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Antoun H, Sitbon JM, Martinez H, Missika P (2001) A prospective randomized study comparing two techniques of bone augmentation: onlay graft alone or associated with a membrane. Clin Oral Implants Res 12:632–639

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bettega G, Brun JP, Cracowski JL, Vérain A, Raphael B (2005) Use of autologous platelet concentrates during pre-implantation maxillary reconstruction. Revue de Stomatologie et de Chirurgie Maxillofaciale 106:189–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bianchi A, Felice P, Lizio G, Marchetti C (2008) Alveolar distraction osteogenesis versus inlay bone grafting in posterior mandibular atrophy: a prospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 105:282–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brånemark PI, Gröndahl K, Öhrnell LO, Nilsson P, Petruson B, Svensson B et al (2004) Zygoma fixture in the management of advanced atrophy of the maxilla: technique and long-term results. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 38:70–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brånemark P-I, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindström J, Hallén O et al (1977) Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Almqvist & Wiksell International, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cawood JI, Howell RA (1991) Reconstructive preprosthetic surgery. I. Anatomical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 20:75–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chiapasco M, Romeo E, Casentini P, Rimondini L (2004) Alveolar distraction osteogenesis vs. vertical guided bone regeneration for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a 1-3-year prospective study on humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 15:82–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Rimondini L (2007) Autogenous onlay bone grafts vs. alveolar distraction osteogenesis for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a 2-4-year prospective study on humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 18:432–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P (2009) Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

    Google Scholar 

  10. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Kakisis I, Coulthard P, Worthington HV (2008) Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of perimplantitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Wiley, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  11. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Kwan S, Worthington HV, Coulthard P (2008) Interventions for replacing missing teeth: bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Wiley, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  12. Esposito M, Hirsch J-M, Lekholm U, Thomsen P (1998) Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I) Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 106:527–551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Esposito M, Worthington HV, Coulthard P (2005) Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in zygomatic bone for the rehabilitation of the severely deficient edentulous maxilla. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Wiley, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  14. Felice P, Cannizzaro G, Checchi V, Pellegrino G, Censi P, Esposito M (2009) Vertical bone augmentation versus 7 mm long dental implants in posterior atrophic mandibles. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2:7–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Felice P, Marchetti C, Piattelli A, Pellegrino G, Checchi V, Worthington H et al (2008) Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional block grafts: bone from the iliac crest versus bovine anorganic bone. Results up to delivery of the final prostheses from a split-mouth, randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 1:183–187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Felice P, Pistilli R, Lizio G, Pellegrino G, Nisii A, Marchetti C (2009) Inlay versus onlay iliac bone grafting in atrophic posterior mandible: a prospective controlled clinical trial for the comparison of two techniques. Clin Implant Dentistry Relat Res 11:e69–e82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fiorellini JP, Nevins ML (2003) Localized ridge augmentation/preservation. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 8:321–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fontana F, Santoro F, Maiorana C, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Simion M (2008) Clinical and histologic evaluation of allogenic bone matrix versus autogenous bone chips associated with titanium-reinforced e-PTFE membrane for vertical ridge augmentation: a prospective pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 23:1003–1012

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Friedmann A, Strietzel FP, Maretzki B, Pitaru S, Bernimoulin JP (2002) Histological assessment of augmented jaw bone utilizing a new collagen barrier membrane compared to a standard barrier membrane to protect a granular bone substitute material. Clin Oral Implants Res 13:587–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kahnberg K-E, Nyström E, Bartholdsson L (1989) Combined use of bone grafts and Brånemark fixtures in the treatment of severely resorbed maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 4:297–304

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Keller EE (1992) The maxillary interpositional composite graft. In: Worthington P, Brånemark P-I (eds) Advanced osseointegration surgery: applications in the maxillofacial region. Quintessence, Chicago, pp 162–174

    Google Scholar 

  22. Meijndert L, Meijer HJ, Stellingsma K, Stegenga B, Raghoebar GM (2007) Evaluation of aesthetics of implant-supported single-tooth replacements using different bone augmentation procedures: a prospective randomized clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 18:715–719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Merli M, Migani M, Esposito M (2007) Vertical ridge augmentation with autogenous bone grafts: resorbable barriers supported by ostheosynthesis plates versus titanium-reinforced barriers. A preliminary report of a blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22:373–382

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG (2001) The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 357:1191–1194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Obwegeser HL (1969) Surgical correction of small or retrodisplaced maxillae. The “dish-face” deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 43:351–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Raghoebar GM, Liem RS, Bos RR, van der Wal JE, Vissink A (2006) Resorbable screws for fixation of autologous bone grafts. Clin Oral Implants Res 17:288–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Raghoebar GM, Schortinghuis J, Liem RS, Ruben JL, van der Wal JE, Vissink A (2005) Does platelet-rich plasma promote remodeling of autologous bone grafts used for augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor? Clin Oral Implants Res 16:349–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rocchietta I, Fontana F, Simion M (2008) Clinical outcomes of vertical bone augmentation to enable dental implant placement: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 35:203–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Roccuzzo M, Ramieri G, Bunino M, Berrone S (2007) Autogenous bone graft alone or associated with titanium mesh for vertical alveolar ridge augmentation: a controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 18:286–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schortinghuis J, Bronckers AL, Gravendeel J, Stegenga B, Raghoebar GM (2008) The effect of ultrasound on osteogenesis in the vertically distracted edentulous mandible: a double-blind trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:1014–1021

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Schortinghuis J, Bronckers ALJJ, Steganga B, Raghoebar GM, de Bont LGM (2005) Ultrasound to stimulate early bone formation in a distraction gap: a double blind randomised clinical pilot trial in the edentulous mandible. Arch Oral Biol 50:411–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Steinemann SG (1998) Titanium – the material of choice? Periodontology 2000(17):7–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stellingsma K, Bouma J, Stegenga B, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM (2003) Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant-retained overdentures. A prospective, comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 14:166–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tolman DE (1995) Reconstructive procedures with endosseous implants in grafted bone: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 10:275–294

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Valentin-Opran A, Wozney J, Csimma C, Lilly L, Riedel GE (2002) Clinical evaluation of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Clin Orthop Relat Res 395:110–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Van der Zee E, Oosterveld P, Van Waas MA (2004) Effect of GBR and fixture installation on gingiva and bone levels at adjacent teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 15:62–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Sylvia Bickley (Cochrane Oral Health Group) and Anna Littlewood for their assistance with literature searching; Luisa Fernandez Mauleffinch and Philip Riley (Cochrane Oral Health Group) for their help with the preparation of this review; Stella Kwan who co-authored a previous version of this review; Matteo Chiapasco, Filippo Fontana, Giuseppe Lizio, Gerry Raghoebar, Jurjen Schortinghuis and Kees Stellingsma for providing us with additional information on their trials. We would also like to thank the following referees: Stephen Chen, Matteo Chiapasco, Christer Dahlin, Mats Hallman, Jayne Harrison, Jan Hirsch, Ian Needleman, Gerry Raghoebar and Bill Shaw.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Esposito .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Esposito, M., Grusovin, M.G., Felice, P., Karatzopoulos, G., Worthington, H.V., Coulthard, P. (2010). The Efficacy of Horizontal and Vertical Bone Augmentation Procedures for Dental Implants: A Cochrane Systematic Review. In: Chiappelli, F. (eds) Evidence-Based Practice: Toward Optimizing Clinical Outcomes. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05025-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05025-1_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05024-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-05025-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics