Advertisement

Cultural Aspects of Secrecy in Global Economy

  • Enric Serradell-Lopez
  • Victor Cavaller
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 49)

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to provide greater understanding of the nature of secrecy in firms. It presents an effort to develop some links between management of the secrecy and its relationship with culture. Using measures from Hofstede’s work, we have linked some dimensions of national culture with CIS 3 UE survey database. The results show that some attributes of the culture as Masculinity and Uncertainty Avoidance have impact on the tendency of the firms for not to patent and maintain secrecy of their innovations.

Keywords

secrets patents management of the secret innovation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anton, J., Greene, H., Yao, D.: Policy implications of weak patent rights. In: Jaffe, A., Lerner, J., Stern, S. (eds.) Innovation policy and the economy, vol. 6, pp. 1–26. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., Walsh, J.P.: Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). n.7552, http://www.nber.org/papers/w7552
  3. 3.
    Dufresne, R.L., Offstein, E.H.: On the virtues of secrecy in organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry 17(2), 102–106 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hofstede, G.: Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage, Newbury Park (1980)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hofstede, G.: Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Sage, Newbury Park (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hannah, D.R.: An examination of the factors that influence whether newcomers protect or share secrets of their former employees. Journal of Management Studies 44, 465–487 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    OECD.: Oslo Manual.Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Third Edition, http://www.ttgv.org.tr/UserFiles/File/OSLO-EN.pdf
  8. 8.
    Radauer, A., Streicher, J., Ohler, F.: Benchmarking national and regional support services for EMS in the field of intellectual and industrial property. Austrian institute for EMS research, Vienna (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schmidt, T.: An empirical analysis of the effects of patents and secrecy on knowledge spillovers. ZEW discussion Paper, n. 06-048, Mannheim, ftp://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp06048.pdf
  10. 10.
    Shane, S.A.: Cultural influences on national rates of innovation. Journal of Business Venturing 8, 59–73 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shane, S.A.: Uncertainty avoidance and the preference for innovation championing roles. Journal of International Business Studies 26, 47–68 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Steensma, H.K., Marino, L., Weaver, K.M.: Attitudes toward Cooperative Strategies: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Entrepreneurs. Journal of International Business Studies 31(4), 591–609 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Triandis, H.: Individualism and Collectivism. Westview Press, Boulder (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zarzeski, M.T.: Spontaneous harmonization effects of culture and market forces on accounting disclosure practices. Accounting Horizons 10(1), 18–37 (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enric Serradell-Lopez
    • 1
  • Victor Cavaller
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Business SciencesOpen University of Catalonia 
  2. 2.Department of Information and CommunicationOpen University of Catalonia 

Personalised recommendations