Abstract
Concluding the description of OntoCAPE, we will subsequently present the major principles according to which the ontology has been designed. Basically, design principles are objective criteria for guiding and evaluating the design decisions made during ontology development (Gruber 1995). A number of design principles for information modeling in general, and ontology engineering in particular, have been suggested in the literature (e.g., Gruber 1995; Fox and Grüninger 1998; Arpírez et al. 1998; Chandrasekaran et al. 1999; Gómez-Pérez et al. 2004; Rector et al. 2004; Smith 2006; and others). Compliance with these acknowledged principles is a credible indicator for the quality of an ontology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aitken S (1998) Extending the HPKB-upper-level ontology: experiences and observations. In: Proceedings of the ECAI-98 Workshop on Applications of Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods:11–15.
Arpírez JC, Gómez-Pérez A, Lozano A, Pinto HS (1998) (ONTO)2Agent: an ontology-based WWW broker to select ontologies. In: Proceedings of the ECAI-98 Workshop on Applications of Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods:16–24.
Borst WN (1997) Construction of Engineering Ontologies for Knowledge Sharing and Reuse. PhD Thesis, Centre for Telematics and Information Technology, University of Twente.
Chandrasekaran B, Josephson JR, Benjamins VR (1999) What are ontologies, and why do we need them? IEEE Intell. Syst. 14 (1):20–26.
Cohen WW, Borgida A, Hirsh H (1992) Computing least common subsumers in description logics. In: Swartout W (ed.): Proceedings of the 10th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. MIT Press:754–760.
Fox MS, Grüninger M (1998) Enterprise modeling. AI Mag. 19 (3):109–121.
GNU (2006) CVS – Open Source Version Control. Online available at http://www.nongnu.org/cvs/. Accessed October 2007.
Gómez-Pérez A, Fernández-López M, Corcho O (2004) Ontological Engineering. Springer, Berlin.
Gruber TR (1995) Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 43 (5/6):907–928.
Gruber TR, Olsen GR (1994) An Ontology for Engineering Mathematics. In: Doyle J, Torasso P, Sandewall E (eds.): Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann. Online available at http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/knowledge-sharing/pa-pers/engmath.html. Accessed September 2007.
Molitor R (2000) Unterstützung der Modellierung verfahrenstechnischer Prozesse durch Nicht-Standardinferenzen in Beschreibungslogiken. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, RWTH Aachen University.
Noy NF, Klein M (2004) Ontology evolution: not the same as schema evolution. Knowl. Inform. Syst. 6:428–440.
Racer Systems (2007) RacerPro Reference Manual. Online available at http://www.racer-systems.com/products/racerpro/reference-manual-1-9-2-beta.pdf. Accessed June 2008.
Rector A, ed. (2005) Representing Specified Values in OWL: “value partitions” and “value sets”. W3C Working Group Note, 17 May 2005. Online available at http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-specified-values. Accessed November 2007.
Rector A, Welty C, eds. (2005) Simple part-whole relations in OWL Ontologies. W3C Editor’s Draft, 11 August 2005. Online available at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/SimplePartWhole/. Accessed November 2007.
Rector A, Drummond N, Horridge M, Rogers J, Knublauch H, Stevens R, Wang H, Wroe C (2004) OWL pizzas: practical experience of teaching OWL-DL: common errors and common patterns. In: Motta E, Shadbolt N, Stutt A, Gibbins N (eds.): Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Acquisition (EKAW). Springer:63–81.
Seipel D, Baumeister J (2004) Declarative methods for the evaluation of ontologies. Künstliche Intelligenz 18 (4):51–57.
Smith B (2006) Against idiosyncrasy in ontology development. In: Bennett B, Fellbaum C (eds.): Formal Ontology in Information Systems. IOS Press:15–26.
Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (2008) The Protégé Ontology Editor and Knowledge Acquisition System. Online available at http://protege.stanford.edu/. Accessed January 2008.
Tsarkov D, Horrocks I (2007) FaCT++. Online available at http://owl.man.ac.uk/factplusplus/. Accessed January 2008.
Wüsteneck KD (1963) Zur philosophischen Verallgemeinerung und Bestimmung des Modellbegriffs. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 1963:1504 et sqq.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marquardt, W., Morbach, J., Wiesner, A., Yang, A. (2010). Design Principles of OntoCAPE. In: OntoCAPE. RWTHedition. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04655-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04655-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04654-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04655-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)