Abstract
Entrepreneurship as an emerging enquiry is interrogated and the rationale for engaging in entrepreneurial studies is discussed through several consolidated findings. Obstacles constraining the field are highlighted, with specific emphasis on how definitional caveats and theoretical incompleteness may lead to reluctance to accept entrepreneurship as an established discipline. The study of entreprenology is introduced as a means of establishing ontology for the field. The point is made that no discipline can exist without theory, and the necessity towards establishing a new science – entreprenology, would position entrepreneurship as a distinctive domain of study. Entrepreneurship as embodied in different paradigms is investigated, and due to the eclectic nature of the subject matter, meta-triangulation is recommended for studying this multifaceted phenomenon. Next, five criteria are stipulated against which to examine if a field may be considered an established discipline; these are scrutinised against current developments in the field. Moving to more descriptive content, the extent of participation in entrepreneurship studies is explored, and several different institutional formats, countries, and various forms of entrepreneurship programmes are scrutinised. The state-of affairs in entrepreneurship offerings at South Africa Higher Institutions are summarised. Based on empirical evidence, entrepreneurship offerings come in various shapes and forms, and results from several multinational surveys are interpreted in terms of syllabi and pedagogies utilised. Moreover, in order to illuminate the distinctiveness of this emerging discipline, sharp distinctions are raised between entrepreneurship and generic management and small business management. Finally, an African perspective is provided where it is intimated that current entrepreneurship studies in Africa are predominantly oriented towards preparing individuals for employment rather than for entrepreneurship.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References and further readings
Bawuah K, Buame S & Hinson R. (2006). Reflections on entrepreneurship education in African tertiary institutions. Acta Commercii 1–9.
Béchard JP & Grégoire D. (2005). Entrepreneurship education research revisited: the case of higher education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1):22–42.
Brodie J, Douglas T & Laing S. (2008). Students as consultants – adding value to the small to medium enterprise. Presented at the International Council for Small Business World Conference, June 22–25.
Brush GC, Duhaime IM, Gartner WB, Stewart A, Katz JA, Hitt MA, Alvarez SA, Meyer GD & Venkataraman S. (2003). Doctoral education in the fields of entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3):309–331.
Bruyat C & Julien PA. (2000). Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 16:165–180.
Burrell G & Morgan G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
Bygrave WD. (1989). The entrepreneurship paradigm (II). Chaos and catastrophes among quantum jumps. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14 Winter:7–26.
Curran J. (2000). Factors influencing small business start-ups, a comparison with previous research. International Small Business Journal, 8(2):98–104.
Davies TA. (2001). Entrepreneurship development in South Africa: redefining the role of tertiary institutions in a reconfigured higher education system. South African Journal of Higher Education, 15(1).
Davies MS. (1999). Aphorisms and Clichés: The Generation and Dissipation of Conceptual Charisma. Annual Review of Sociology, 25:245–269.
Driver A, Wood E, Segal N & Herrington M. (2001). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. South African Executive Report. UCT.
Fiet JO. (2000 a). The theoretical side of teaching entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 16:1–24.
Fiet JO. (2000 b). The pedagogical side of entrepreneurship Theory. Journal of Business Venturing, 16:101–117.
Filion LJ. (1997). Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurs and Small Business Owner Manager. Montreal: Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (HEC).
Gartner WB, Bird BJ & Starr JA. (1992). Acting as if: differentiating entrepreneurial from organizational behaviour. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Spring: 13–31.
Gibb AA. (2000). SME policy, academic research and the growth of ignorance, mythical concepts, myths, assumptions, rituals and confusions. International Small Business Journal, 18(3):13–35.
Gibb AA. (2006). Entrepreneurship/enterprise education in schools and colleges: are we really building the onion or peeling it away? Presented at the International Council for Small Business ICSB 51st World Conference, June 18–21.
Gorman G, Hanlon D & King W. (1997). Some research perspectives on entrepreneurship education, enterprise education and education for small business management: a ten-year literature review. International Small Business Journal, 15(3).
Grant P & Perren L. (2002). Small business and entrepreneurial research meta-theories, paradigms and prejudices. International Small Business Journal, 20(2):185–211.
Henning E & van Rensburg W. (1999). Academic development in writing composition: beyond the limitations of a functionalist and pragmatic curriculum. Journal for Language Teaching, 36(1–2).
Hills EG. (1988). Variations in university entrepreneurship education: an empirical study of an evolving field. Journal of Business Venturing, 3(2):109–122.
Jansen JD. (2004). How mergers shape the institutional curriculum. Education as change, 7(2):3–19.
Johannisson B. (1991). University training for entrepreneurship: a Swedish approach. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 3(1):67–82.
Katz JA. (2003). The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2):283–300.
Kaufmann PJ & Dant RP. (1998). Franchising and the domain of entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 14:5–16.
Kjeldsen C. (2003). A benchmark study of entrepreneurship – What can Denmark learn? National Agency for Enterprise and Construction. Construction of growth indicators, Eurostat 1998–2000.
Klandt H. (2004). Entrepreneurship education and research in German-speaking Europe. Academy of Management Learning, 3(3):293–301.
Laukkanen M. (2000). Exploring Alternative Approaches in High-Level Entrepreneurship Education. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12(1).
Lee SH & Wong PK. (2004). An exploratory study of technopreneurial intentions: a career anchor perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 19:7–28.
Lewis MW. (1999). Meta-triangulation: building theory from multiple paradigms. Academy of Management Review, 24(4).
Low M. (2001). The adolescence of entrepreneurship research. Specification of purpose. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4):17–26.
Morris M. (2004). Reflections on the advancement of the field and the JDE. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 9(3):v–vi.
Nixdorff J & Solomon G. (2005). Role of opportunity recognition in teaching entrepreneurship. www.icsb.org. Available online: accessed on 25 Feb 2007.
Okpara FO. (2008). Building an entrepreneurial university for the challenges of the 21st century – the Ethiopian perspective. Presented at the International Council for Small Business World Conference, June 22–25.
Plaschka GR & Welsch HP. (1990). Emerging structures in entrepreneurship education: curricular design and strategies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(3):322–337.
Reynolds PD, Bygrave WD, Autio E & Others. (2003). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Executive Report. USA: Babson College.
Ronstadt R. (1990). Emerging structures in entrepreneurship education: curricular designs and strategies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Spring: 55–70.
Schwandt DR. (2005). When managers become philosophers: integrating learning with sensemaking. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(2):176–192.
Seikkula-Leino J. (2008). Implementing entrepreneurship education through curriculum reform. Presented at the International Council for Small Business World Conference, June 22–25.
Shane S & Venkataraman S. (2001). Entrepreneurship as a field of research: A Response to Zahra and Dess, Singh and Erickson. Academy of Management Review, 26(1).
Shane S & Venkataraman S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1):217–235.
Solomon GT, Duffy S & Tarabishy A. (2002). The state of entrepreneurship education in the United States: a nationwide survey and analysis. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 1(1):1–22.
Solomon GT, Fernald LW & Weaver MK. (1993). Pedagogical methods of teaching entrepreneurship: an historical perspective. Gaming and Simulation, 25(3):338–354.
Stewart Jr WH, Watson WE, Carland JC & Carland JW. (1998). A proclivity for entrepreneurship: a comparison of entrepreneurs, small business owners, and corporate managers. Journal of Business Venturing, 14:189–214.
Thierry VA & Susan M. (2006). Conceptual framework for testing the effectiveness of entrepreneurship education: programs towards entrepreneurial intention. Presented at the International Council for Small Business ICSB 51st World Conference, June 18–21.
Urban B. (2006). Entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions: an HE perspective. Education as Change, 10(3):14–25.
Venkataraman S. (2003). Regional transformation through technological entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19:153–167.
Vesper KH & Gartner WB. (1997). Measuring progress in entrepreneurship education. Journal of Business Venturing, 12:403–421.
Babson College: http://www3.babson.edu/
The Arthur M. Blank Center for Entrepreneurship at Babson College: http://www3.babson edu/eship/
Babson Symposia for Entrepreneurship Educators – SEE: http://www3.babson edu/ESHIP/programs/BabsonSEE/
Stanford Graduate School of Business: http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/
Center for Entrepreneurial Studies Stanford Graduate School of Business: http://www.gsb.stanford edu/ces/index.html
The Harvard Business School: http://www.hbs.edu/
Arthur Rock Center for Entrepreneurship: http://www.hbs.edu/entrepreneurship/
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT): http://www.mit.edu/
MIT Sloan School of Management: http://mitsloan.mit.edu/indexflash.php
UCLA Anderson School of Management: http://www.anderson.ucla.edu/
International council of small business: www.icsb.org
NCGE: www.ncge.org.uk
Global entrepreneurship monitor: www.gem.consortuim.org
Companion website: www.heinemann.co.za
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Urban, B. (2010). Entrepreneurship as a discipline and field of study. In: Urban, B. (eds) Frontiers in Entrepreneurship. Perspectives in Entrepreneurship. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04502-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04502-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04501-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04502-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)