Skip to main content

Redefining Innovation as System Re-Definition

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

Ironically, our understandings of innovation appear to become increasingly vague, as “innovation” has been one of the most powerful buzz words. Currently, the concept of innovation is likely to be misunderstood just as “something new” or “something good”. Since Schumpeter first defined innovation as new combination, there has been substantial accumulation of innovation research. Despite the rich literature on innovation, not only Schumpeter but also many followers did not pay much attention into the core of the definition of innovation. We will go back to the basics of innovation research in order to reexamine the essence of innovation, and to derive theoretical and practical implications for managing innovation in modern competitive environment. Redefining innovation as “system redefinition”, we will present an analytical framework of innovation to explore its discontinuous nature of new combination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “V-shaped Recovery Neglects Technology: Will Sony Repeat Nissan’s Mistakes?” WEDGE (September 2007 issue)

  2. 2.

    Fujimura (2004) characterizes a product as consisting of the similar three layers, and analyzes impacts of product modularization.

  3. 3.

    As we discuss later, this way of characterizing innovation is similar to that of Abernathy and Clark (1985).

References

  • Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. B. (1985). Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: economic and social factors. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoshima, Y. & Takeishi, A. (2007). Products as parts. In Japanese, Organizational Science, 40(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000). Design rules: the power of modularity. Cambridge Mass: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open business models. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. (1992). Exploring the limit of the technology S-curve. Part I: component technologies. Production and Operations Management., 1(4), Fall, 334–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. (1992). Exploring the limit of the technology S-curve. Part II: architectural technologies. Production and Operations Management, 1(4), Fall, 358–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Cambridge: HBS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product development performance. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demzetz, H. (1988). The theory of the firm revisited. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4(1), 141–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, T. (1997). The evolutionary theory of production systems. In Japanese, Tokyo: Yuhikaku.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, T., & Takeishi, A. (1995). An international comparison of productivity and product development performance in the automobile industry. In R. Minami, K. S. Kim, F., Makino,, & J. Seo, (Eds.), Acquiring, adapting and developing technologies - lesson from the japanese experience -. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, T., Takeishi, A., & Aoshima, Y. (Eds.) (2001). Business architecture: strategic design of products, organizations, and processes. In Japanese, Tokyo: Toyo Keizai Shimposha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, T., & Yasumoto, M. (eds.) (2000). Seiko-suru seihin kaihatsu (successful product development). In Japanese, Tokyo: Yuhikaku.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimura, S. (2004), Gijutsuno Kozo to Innovation- Kagaku-Gijutsu ni Motozuita Seihin Kaihatsu no Model (Structure of Technology and Innovation- A model of product development based on science and technology). (In Japanese) Gijutsu Kakushingta Kigyo Sosei Project, Discussion Paper Series #04-01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. (1993). Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. RAND Journal of Economics, 24, 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage: what the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue ocean strategy: How to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokuryo, J. (1999). Open network management. In Japanese, Tokyo: Nihon-Keizai-Shinbunsha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monden, Y. (1991). Shin toyota system (the new toyota system). In Japanese, Tokyo: Kodansha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno, T. (1978). Toyota seisan houshiki (the toyota production system). In Japanese, Tokyo: Diamond-Sha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., Takeuchi, H., & Sakakibara, M. (2000). Can Japan Compete?, Cambridge, MA: Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. MA: Harvard University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1990). The theory of industrial organization. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 439–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, K. (1995). The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy, 24, 419–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (1995). Product design and development. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ken Kusunoki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kusunoki, K., Aoshima, Y. (2010). Redefining Innovation as System Re-Definition. In: Itami, H., Kusunoki, K., Numagami, T., Takeishi, A. (eds) Dynamics of Knowledge, Corporate Systems and Innovation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04480-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics