Facing Tagging Data Scattering

  • Oscar Díaz
  • Jon Iturrioz
  • Cristóbal Arellano
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5802)


Web2.0 has brought tagging at the forefront of user practises for organizing and locating resources. Unfortunately, these tagging efforts suffer from a main drawback: lack of interoperability. Such situation hinders tag sharing (e.g. tags introduced at to be available at Flickr) and, in practice, leads to tagging data to be locked to tagging sites. This work argues that for tagging to reach its full potential, tag management systems should be provided that accounts for a common way to handle tags no matter the tagging site (e.g., Flickr) that frontended the tagging. This paper introduces TAGMAS (TAG MAnagement System) that offers a global view of your tagging data no matter where it is located. By capitalizing on TAGMAS, tagging applications can be built in a quicker and robust way. Using measurements and one use case, we demonstrate the practicality and performance of TAGMAS.


Tagging sites Web2.0 Datasets 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    IEEE Standard Glossary of Computer Networking Terminology (May 1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    SPARQL Query Language for RDF (2007),
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Geambasu, R., Cheung, C., Moshchuk, A., Gribble, S.D., Levy, H.M.: Organizing and Sharing Distributed Personal Web-Service Data. In: World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Golder, S.A., Hubermann, B.A.: The Structure of Collaborative Tagging System. Technical report, HP Labs (2006),
  9. 9.
    Kipp, M.E.I.: @toread and Cool: Subjective, Affective and Associative Factors in Tagging. In: Canadian Association for Information Science (CAIS 2008) (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knerr, T.: Tagging Ontology - Towards a Common Ontology for Folksonomies (2007),
  11. 11.
    Lund, B., Hammond, T., Flack, M., Hannay, T.: Social Bookmarking Tools (II). D-Lib Magazine (2005),
  12. 12.
    Oren, E., Haller, A., Hauswirth, M., Heitmann, B., Decker, S., Mesnage, C.: A Flexible Integration Framework for Semantic Web 2.0 Applications. IEEE Software, 64–71 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ramakrishnan, R., Gehrke, J.: Database Management Systems, ch. 6, pp. 177–192. McGraw-Hill, New York (2003), zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oscar Díaz
    • 1
  • Jon Iturrioz
    • 1
  • Cristóbal Arellano
    • 1
  1. 1.ONEKIN Research GroupUniversity of the Basque CountrySan SebastiánSpain

Personalised recommendations